similar to: A bareos question

IP wrote: > W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>>> Trouble is, >>>> all I

On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, >> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to >> install on Windoze",

After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with kerberos? I see that they have in alpha(?) tls support, which isn't a great idea, given the recent

I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to install on Windoze", and how to restore.... First question: how do you *see* a list of the files that have been backed up (you're not going to tell

W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: > On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>> Trouble is, >>> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to

Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't get much response. I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I don't just see it with ls. Then, when I do an ls, in

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making > it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging > mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, > arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with > kerberos? I see

W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: > Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't > get much response. Hi. It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from them - when they could get some money for that (paid support). For me it was

On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't > get much response. > > I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The > restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few > files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my

I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as "no games".) Is there

Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: >> Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I >> didn't get much response. > > It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid > support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from > them - when they could get

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried >> posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person >> view my post.... >> >> It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about >> a week ago, the server got

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <snip> >> I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The >> restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few >> files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I >> don't just see it with ls. Then,

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, September 3, 2015 10:48 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> IP wrote: >>> W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >>>> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for Linux. Now

Hi, folks, I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person view my post.... It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about a week ago, the server got a regular yum update, and rebooted... and it's broken. A job will start... and just keep running forever (as in,

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

Hi, folks, I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I say restore, then from most recent, then the client, and I want to select files. It builds its directory tree (it says), then tells me it's at c:/ (*Nix, not Win backslash)... and there's nothing there. The fileset stanza says to

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been > looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd > like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found > yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online > storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm

I'm trying to get this up and running, and have run into something that isn't clear in the docs: volumes are part of pools, I get, but I see that the limit to the number of volumes is 100. Is this a drop-dead can't-go-beyond? If I have > 100 clients to back up, do they all go to one volume, or to individual volumes? mark

On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried > posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person > view my post.... > > It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about a > week ago, the server got a regular yum update, and rebooted... and it's