similar to: Server used in DOS attack on UDP port 0

Hai, If you use that or the AD, then its incomplete, imo. Your missing ldaps (636) and the GC (ssl) 3268/3269) ports and maybe NTP (123/tcp) if installed. Maybe you dont need them, just an observation. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jeff > Sadowski via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2018

Hi! I have a minimal installation of centos8 + packages for freeipa as a vbox vm. there is something strange with the firewall rules : [root at ldap ~]# iptables -S -P INPUT ACCEPT -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT ACCEPT [root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --get-active-zones public interfaces: enp0s17 [root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --state running [root at ldap ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public

On 02/24/2015 01:15 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/23/2015 08:22 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: >> 1. Users should be manageable through a GUI, probably a web interface, >> so the client can create, manage and delete them eventually. > > FreeIPA is a good option, generally. As best I understand it, it's > currently available in a Docker container for CentOS. >

Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for computer centric discussion. https://enterpriselinux.slack.com/shared_invite/MTY4MTM5NjQ2NTc5LTE0OTE5OTkyNTctMjkyNGU1NWQzOA My hope is that those running

I tried the following firewall-cmd --add-service=dns --permanent firewall-cmd --add-service=samba --permanent firewall-cmd --reload But was not able to connect until I disabled the iptables via iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT iptables -F then I was able to connect my windows 10 pro to my domain. So my question is what services or ports am I missing to open?

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Am 13.02.2018 um 05:16 schrieb Jeff Sadowski via samba: >> So my question is what services or ports am I missing to open? > > AD DCs: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage perfect exactly what I was looking for I found some docs about firewalld that

Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos Here is the list of services: RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula bacula-client dhcp dhcpv6 dhcpv6-client dns ftp high-availability http https imaps ipp ipp-client ipsec kerberos kpasswd ldap ldaps libvirt libvirt-tls mdns mountd

Hello, We're starting to use FreeIPA in house (which is awesome btw) which means that Kerberos and TLS client certificate authentication is suddenly quite easy. Im looking for a list of common Linux services with data on how one can Authenticate/Authorise for these services. * httpd support TLS client certificate authentication and Kerberos * rabbitmq supports TLS client certificate

Progress... On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service > now, i'm not "pro" systemd or con systemd, i use it but i set my

On 08/27/2015 03:29 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 05:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening >> services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: >> >> dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos >> >> Here is the list of services: >> >> RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula

On 27/08/15 13:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service Now here's a funny thing, I was searching the samba wiki for 'firewall' and found there

mDNS is not DNS mDNS (zeroconf/avahi) ( used for .local and .lan reserved tlds ) is an apple thingy.. mDNS udp 5353 DNS tcp/udp 53. Yes, dns tcp + udp. If and dns udp package is to large it switches to tcp. got that from wiets ( the postfix developer ) So i must believe him.. wiets is great.. ( and dutch ) :-)) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba

Oh, this really helps. See below, though. On 08/27/2015 09:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 14:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress... >> >> On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>> After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. >>> >>> I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) >>>

Hi, I have a standard Centos7 AMI. Can anyone tell me whats happening here? Thanks, Andrew Aug 19 11:17:23 master dhclient[22897]: bound to 10.141.10.49 -- renewal in 1795 seconds. Aug 19 11:17:24 master network: Determining IP information for eth0... done. Aug 19 11:17:24 master network: [ OK ] Aug 19 11:17:24 master systemd: Started LSB: Bring up/down networking. Aug 19 11:23:43 master

On 04/12/2017 05:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/12/2017 05:23 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a >> Slack >> for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, >> its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for >>

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Always > Learning > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:23 AM > To: Centos <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue > > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > > > > > Cyber attacks are gradually replacing

Dear All, Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the 'cwp control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora ( http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel. Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about or recommend. Thank you all.

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:23:31 +0100 Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com> wrote: > I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk, > OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a > thing anymore. > > Cheers, > > Andrew the people at virtualmin.com don't agree. Neither do I, I use it a lot and like it. D >

On Mar 20, 2024, at 13:16, Wayne Barron <wayne at cffcs.com> wrote: > In Windows and Linux web servers, we can create a forest for our web servers. > Send traffic to different servers to even the workload. > > Can we do something like this with the Icecast servers? > (or) > Will we have to install new VMs, add the heavy stations on that one, > and send the new traffic

Dear all My 5 cents (or Rappen in CH) if it comes to serving many clients. We are running a 4 node cluster since several years ? rock solid and w/o any issues. This cluster serves many thousands of listeners from all over the world. Our source transcoder sending the audio streams to each Node. Hence, transcoding power is not an issue here. The four Nodes a geographically dispersed in 3