similar to: OT: closing a port on home router

Hi again folks! ;) As before, I will transform one E1 30 Channel PRI into 30 FXS channels using Adit 600. Now I'm into choosing server platform. And the two opponents are: * Dell PowerEdge 750 w/ SCSI RAID (or even SATA RAID1) * FujistuSiemens PRIMERGY RX100 S2 (SATA RAID1) As I've seen people having problem with HP server, I havn't looked at it at all. What experience do you

Initially the bottom half of the screen was cut off for civilization 4 and It seems to have corrected itself now, for unknown reasons. Now it keeps giving the computer opponents time victories within a few minutes. Why is it doing that? And how do i correct it?

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > well, not 2222, but another port I won't identify here, and it > is forwarded to 22 on my linux box. Could an 'idea' also be to close permanently port 22 and configure SSH to use a completely different port ? Inviting hackers by having a functioning, in one way or another, port 22 is asking for trouble. -- Regards,

david wrote: > At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >>James B. Byrne wrote: >> > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> > OS 6? >> >> >> >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument >> >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. >> > >> > Maintenance. >> > >>

In case any of you were wondering why there has been a fairly notable upswing in the attacks happening on SIP endpoints, the answer is "script kiddies." In the last few months, a number of new tools have made it easy for knuckle-draggers to attack and defraud SIP endpoints, Asterisk-based systems included. There are easily-available tools that scan networks looking for SIP

On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This is > not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them to > define their statute. > > People split into two groups: > > Opponents of systemd (, firewqalld, etc.) who argue that from formerly > Unix-like system Linux becomes

Hello everybody, I have a question. I would like to get a correlation between constitutive and induced plant defence which I messured on 30 plant species. So I have table with Species, Induced defence (ID), and constitutive defence (CD). Since Induced and constitutive defence are not independant (so called spurious correlation) I should do a randomisation test. I have a syntax of my

On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 16:47 -0400, mailist wrote: > On 2020-06-21 15:33, Chuck Campbell wrote: > > I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld. > > > > I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific > > ip blocks. > > If you can control the ssh clients, switch your port number to a > non-standard > port. Pick one in

Message-ID: <479F2A63.2070408 at centos.org> On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit causes compromised servers > > SOME of the script kiddies check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see > 4% of the brute force attempts to login on ports other than 22. > > I would say that dropping brute force

>Sorry, I'm not really sure what's going on here, It's >installing via an ebuild cvs which does nothing but download >the sources, ./autogen.sh, configure (with options), make ; >make install. A quick look at that log shows that it is calling ./configure with --disable-doc, however in CVS the option seems to be --disable-doxygen-docs, try changing that in the ebuild

>/tmp/flac/install-sh -d /usr/share/doc/flac-1.1.3/html/api >(cd api && /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 * >/usr/share/doc/flac-1.1.3/html/api) >/usr/bin/install: cannot stat `*': No such file or directory Oops, I see what's doing it -- like Josh said doxygen is required the way things are set up in CVS currently. It's this change here:

Always Learning wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 09:46 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> On 02/13/2015 09:15 AM, Chris Adams wrote: >> > Yeah, the old "move stuff to alternate ports" thing is largely a waste >> > of time and just makes it more difficult for legitimate use. With >> > large bot networks and tools like zmap, finding services on

On 9/12/2015 4:16 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > I'm wanting to close port 22 (ssh) on my home router, and I don't see any > facilities in its GUI for doing that. inbound ports that aren't forwarded are closed by default on most any/all NAT routers, unless the router itself is listening to said port. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:23:14PM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 04:26:09PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 9/12/2015 4:16 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > > > >I'm wanting to close port 22 (ssh) on my home router, and I don't see any > > >facilities in its GUI for doing that. > > > > inbound ports that aren't

On 9/12/2015 9:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > yes, there is port forwarding, of course. I'm forwarding a different > port to 22 on my desktop, and want to close 22 on the router so it won't > also allow access to 22 on my desktop. If you have not set up forwarding for port 22 on the router, it is already closed. You do not need to do anything. If you want to verify this, just

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 9/12/2015 9:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > > >yes, there is port forwarding, of course. I'm forwarding a different > >port to 22 on my desktop, and want to close 22 on the router so it won't > >also allow access to 22 on my desktop. > > If you have not set up forwarding for port 22 on the

On 9/22/2015 1:45 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Actually, connecting to port 22 works fine, or did until my last hacking > session on the router. Which is why I wanted to make it inaccessible. if you're forwarding WAN port 2222, I do not understand what your router is doing with port 22, unless the router itself is also running a sshd -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:09:18PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/22/2015 1:45 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >Actually, connecting to port 22 works fine, or did until my last hacking > >session on the router. Which is why I wanted to make it inaccessible. > > if you're forwarding WAN port 2222, I do not understand what your > router is doing with port 22, unless the

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:32:21AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > > well, not 2222, but another port I won't identify here, and it > > is forwarded to 22 on my linux box. > > Could an 'idea' also be to close permanently port 22 and configure SSH > to use a completely different port ? > >

Hi all, I have a series of cateogiral variables that look just like this: welfare=sample(c("less", "same", "more"), 1000, replace=TRUE) education=sample(c("less", "same", "more"), 1000, replace=TRUE) defence=sample(c("less", "same", "more"), 1000, replace=TRUE) egp=sample(c("salariat",