similar to: Periodic speed test

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17/09/15 13:05, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I run the speedtest from > <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/speedtest-cli/> quite often, and find > it very reliable. > > I'm wondering if anyone has developed a version to run the speed > test at regular intervals, say every 6 hours, and record the > results in a simple database

I wonder if anyone has got speedtest.mini from <http://speedtest.net/mini.php> working under CentOS-6? (It's a version of speedtest that one can run on a local web-server.) It used to work for me, but hasn't for a long time (maybe several years ...) Any suggestions or elucidation gratefully received. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090,

Hi, Thank you so much for your reply, I've a dedicated server in OVH, where I have done speed test for the server : *bkf at xxxxx ~> speedtest-cli Retrieving speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> configuration...Retrieving speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> server list...Testing from OVH SAS (x.x.x.x)...Selecting best server based on latency...Hosted by fdcservers.net

On Linux, when I run "make TEST=ipodbgopt" in MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3 I get: make[4]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/poo/build/test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3' Compiling shell.c to Output/shell.bc /home/foad/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk/MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/speedtest.tcl make[4]: execvp:

Hi, SQLite3 has a very simple build system, and it comes with an extensive testsuite (over 40000 tests). It hasn't shown any bugs in LLVM, but it is fairly simple to build [even turn off features via -D], and can be CPU intensive. I have integrated SQLite3 into llvm-test's build system, it is too large to send as attachment (784K), you can get it from here:

Hello, I''m not subscribed to this list, but would like to ask a question. When I conduct a network speed test from the following location http://www.timewarnerla.com/speedtest/speedtest.asp with firewall started I get no more than 1 Mbps at best, while without one I get 4 Mbps. I have a RCA DCM325 cable modem from RoadRunner. I''m using Shorewall 2.2.0-Beta3. My OS is SuSe 9.1

I've gotten it to work with Firefox in Ubuntu 64-bit. Some sites work (ie youtube.com) but in other sites, it crashes the browser (like speedtest.net ). Just a head's up. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/swfdec/attachments/20070503/430882db/attachment.htm

Dear Marius, Our station is Megadanceradio in Hungary. Our status page for the master server is: http://45.67.158.93:8000/status.xsl For the slave: http://45.67.158.94:8000/status.xsl We are peaking at around 11.00 am and 13.00 pm in the afternoon. We have tested extensively the bandwith with speedtest. We tried with iperf but that did not finish for a long time so we stopped it. Currently

Dear Marius, In addition to that attached please find a screenshot from Proxmox on statistics. Do you know any ice cast servers that puts out more than 1 gbps for a longer period? Just curious whether anyone was able to go beyond 1 gbps for an extensive time. Thank you! Best, Zsolt zsolt makkai <gvmzsolt at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2024. m?rc. 14., Cs, 23:39): > Dear Marius,

Hi Zsolt, looking at the metrics from Proxmox it doesn't look like anything breaks there. What about at the operating system level? Could there be some limits there? Have you checked corresponding kernel or system logs? Which OS/distribution are you using? Checked the logs there? If nothing screams there, maybe start looking at a load balancer and scale with several more VMs? -- Marius

A quick Google search indicates that it might be a Proxmox limitation: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/i-cant-exceed-1gb-of-internet-with-a-10gb-network-card.128710/ On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:24?PM Marius Flage <marius at flage.org> wrote: > Hi Zsolt, > > looking at the metrics from Proxmox it doesn't look like anything breaks > there. What about at the operating

I don't know if any such limitation exists, but maxing out just shy of 1Gbps sounds a bit more like an interface's line speed limited/set to 1Gbps somewhere in your production chain? You wrote that you have tested the bw - what did you use? Iperf? Speedtest?Maybe consider scaling with additional Icecast servers and use a load balancer in front? And then just scale accordingly? This sounds

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:07:59PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for arm, > for use by virtualization. > > smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are > defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h > > This reduces the amount of arch-specific boiler-plate code. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:07:59PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for arm, > for use by virtualization. > > smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are > defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h > > This reduces the amount of arch-specific boiler-plate code. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >

On Monday 15 June 2020 at 21:50:36, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Am 15.06.2020 um 21:28 schrieb Antony Stone: > > On Monday 15 June 2020 at 21:19:51, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > >> But I'm not really sure, that Asterisk could be the problem, since, as I > >> said, the problem happens even if I connect the phone direct to the > >> server of Telekom... > >

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > For spinning loops people do often use barrier() or cpu_relax(). > For most architectures cpu_relax and barrier are the same, but on > some architectures cpu_relax can add some latency. > For example on power,sparc64 and arc, cpu_relax can shift the CPU > towards other hardware threads in an SMT environment.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:03:11AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > For spinning loops people do often use barrier() or cpu_relax(). > For most architectures cpu_relax and barrier are the same, but on > some architectures cpu_relax can add some latency. > For example on power,sparc64 and arc, cpu_relax can shift the CPU > towards other hardware threads in an SMT environment.

Bonjour, *Upload: 282.95 Mbit/s* is going to choke at about 5 listeners * * You need a streaming server provider. https://shoutca.st/ is an example but there are many. Don't buy 5k listeners buy 100 and see how it goes. *regards* *Robert* * * * * On 22/10/18 12:03 AM, Abdelkader BKF wrote: > Hi, > Thank you so much for your reply, > I've a dedicated server in OVH, where