Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "CentOS 7.1 NFS Client Issues - rpc.statd / rpcbind"
2015 Aug 31
1
CentOS 7.1 NFS Client Issues - rpc.statd / rpcbind
That is the thing - rpc.statd does have rpcbind a pre-req. It looks like
systemd is not handling this correctly. Just wondering if anyone knows a
good way to fix.
root at ls2 /usr/lib/systemd/system 110# grep Requires rpc-statd.service
Requires=nss-lookup.target rpcbind.target
On 8/30/15 7:45 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 01:39 PM, Mark Selby wrote:
>> I have seen some talk
2015 Aug 31
0
CentOS 7.1 NFS Client Issues - rpc.statd / rpcbind
On 08/31/2015 01:39 PM, Mark Selby wrote:
> I have seen some talk about this but have not seen any answers. I know
> this is a problem on CentOS 7.1 and I also think it is a problem on
> CentOS 7.0.
>
> Basically if I have an NFS client only config - meaning that the
> nfs-server.service is not enabled then I have to wait 60 seconds after
> boot for the 1st NFSV3 mount to
2018 Apr 16
2
rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
Hello
I'm trying to mount a nfs system. But i receive this message:
mount -t nfs <IP>:/backup /backupnfs
mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
mount.nfs: Either use '-o nolock' to keep locks local, or start statd.
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
After a fews searchs on google
i tried to execute the files:
sbin/rpc.statd
2013 Feb 26
1
Samba 4.0.3 on CentOS 6.3 as PDC.
Any help here? I have included all of the output of the suggested diags that Thomas said I should run, but I admit that I'm not sure what I'm looking for, as I'm not familiar with RPC functionality on Linux. Something is not working with RPC on my Samba 4.0.3 server. (FWIW, it doesn't work with IPTables stopped either.)
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mike Stroven wrote:
2012 Oct 24
2
Why portmap is needed for NFSv4 in CentOS6
Hi all,
I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server.
According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but
in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make NFSv4 works.
My /etc/sysconfig/nfs
#
# Define which protocol versions mountd
# will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes"
# with yes being the default
MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no"
2014 Aug 18
2
need-restart ?
Hi,
today I updated the glibc packages on some CentOS machines. After the
Update I checked which
services/processes I have to restart "yum -C ps" or "needs-restarting"
At the most machines I get no information about necessary restarts, but
at two machines a long listing :
1 : /sbin/init
386 : /sbin/udevd-d
659 : /sbin/udevd-d
999 : /usr/sbin/vmtoolsd
1103 : auditd
1128 :
2013 Sep 03
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED with smbclient and samba 4.0.6
Hello,
I'm trying to install samba 4 as a DC following this tutorial
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO.
Ihave reached the step of testing the connectivity to the DC with smbclient
[root at DC-TEST ~]# /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -L localhost -U%
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Samba 4 has started successfully
[root at DC-TEST ~]# netstat -lntp
2017 Mar 28
1
Failed to connect host xx on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Hello Rowland,
>> ---
>> # Global parameters
>> [global]
>>
>> username map = /etc/samba/user.map
>>
>
> I am sure this has nothing to do with your problem, but you should
> remove the 'username map' line, it has no place on a DC.
>
ok, did so.
>>
>> It really does not listen:
>>
>> root at dc2:~# netstat
2008 Feb 06
1
rpc.statd suddenly listen to rsync port
Hi,
Few days a go one of my rsync server stop respond.
When I tried to figure out way, I discover that rpc.statd is listen to
port 873.
Killing the rpc.statd process bypass the problem.
I'm using an update version CentOS 4.*
rsync start via xinetd.
Do you have any idea how it happen?
Regards,
Milutin Voinivich
NasBackup
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2009 Dec 18
1
mountd and statd at specific ports - nfs firewall
Hi,
I am configuring firewall for NFS.
I see that statd and mountd start at random port. Is there any way to
force it to start at specific port each time. The '-p ' option would
work, but how do I configure it to start at specific port number each
time. I mean where do statd and mountd look for default configuration
options? Any clues?
-
CS.
2009 Aug 11
1
[PATCH server] remove appliance bits
This removes the appliance configuration bits from the installer and associated files since it has been deprecated
---
installer/modules/ovirt/files/cobbler-import | 6 -
.../modules/ovirt/files/ovirt-appliance-setup | 4 -
installer/modules/ovirt/files/ovirt-storage | 73 ----------
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/appliance.pp | 152 --------------------
4 files
2010 Sep 01
2
statd random port - sysconfig/nfs not taking effect
I have changed /etc/sysconfig/nfs to specify port numbers for NFS
daemons. Somehow statd is still starting up at random port number.
Other damons are starting at properly at specified port numbers Any
clues on what might be wrong? Any other location/setting that takes
precedence over sysconfig/nfs ? It's CentOS 5.5 64bit with nfs-utils
1.0.9-44.el5.
--
Thanks,
CS
2024 Oct 15
1
ctdb tcp settings for statd failover
Hi,
In current (6140c3177a0330f42411618c3fca28930ea02a21) samba's ctdb/tools/statd_callout_helper I find this comment:
notify)
...
# we need these settings to make sure that no tcp connections survive
# across a very fast failover/failback
#echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
#echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_tw_buckets
#echo 0 >
2015 Nov 07
2
Cannot chown file to active directory user/group on member server
Hi,
I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active
directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but
'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong?
archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4
17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2413096 ноя 2 19:50 ./test.mp4
archive-test:/archive/video # wbinfo -u
2013 Jul 12
1
port for rpc.statd occupied rsync port
Hello,
booting starts /etc/init.d/nfslock. today, rpc.statd used port 873.
later starting xinetd finds port used and disabled rsync daemon.
So its more or less a lucky break, to boot CentOS and have rsync running?
In /etc/rc3.d is
S14nfslock
S56xinetd
so by design xinetd starts always after nfslock!!!!
Best regards
--
Viele Gr??e
i.V. Helmut Drodofsky
________________________________
2005 Jun 01
2
advice on removing these daemons from server - rpc.statd rpc.idmapd acpid
greetings,
is there any reason i would want any of these daemons active in memory on a
simple DNS server if i do not use NFS and... of course, the unit is not
being used as a workstation.
1712 ? Ss 0:00 rpc.statd
1745 ? Ss 0:00 rpc.idmapd
1813 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid
tia
- rh
2016 May 04
2
c6, drbd and file systems
On 5/4/2016 12:41 AM, Patrick Begou wrote:
>
> Any messages in /var/log/boot.log ?
indeed, it appears it tries to mount local file systems BEFORE drbd is
started. because /data isn't mounted, backuppc can't start either.
so do I have to edit the chkconfig priorities in /etc/init.d and
recreate the rc3.d S** and K** scripts so drbd starts earlier? ugh.
# cat ore
2010 Oct 19
0
CTDB starting statd without -n gfs -H /etc/ctdb/statd-callout
Hello,
First and foremost, thanks *very* much for ctdb. It's a joy to use
after banging around with other HA solutions. We're planning to use
it to export Samba and NFS shares throughout campus.
I'm having one problem with the NFS part though. When ctdbd first
starts statd (we're using CTDB_MANAGES_NFS=yes), it does so without
appending the stuff in the STATD_HOSTNAME variable
2017 Mar 28
4
Failed to connect host xx on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Hello there,
I installed a dc1 using debian jessie-packages strictly following the samba-manual "Setting up Samba as an Active Directory Domain Controller".
I installed a dc2 using debian jessie-packages, also strictly following the manual for "Joining a Samba DC to an Existing Active Directory".
It worked for a few weeks but then it quit working without having changed the
2024 Oct 16
1
ctdb tcp settings for statd failover
Hi Ulrich,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:22:51 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> In current (6140c3177a0330f42411618c3fca28930ea02a21) samba's
> ctdb/tools/statd_callout_helper I find this comment:
>
> notify)
> ...
> # we need these settings to make sure that no tcp connections
> survive # across a very fast failover/failback