similar to: centos 6 - changing resolv.conf by hand gets overwritten by rebooting

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

Nice shell script,?Louis. Here are the results: Collected config ?--- 2019-06-20-12:46 ----------- Hostname: umbriel DNS Domain: samdom.mycompany.net FQDN: umbriel.samdom.mycompany.net ipaddress: 192.168.3.203? ----------- Samba is running as an AD DC ----------- ? ? ? ?Checking file: /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)" ID=ubuntu

I've been working on this problem for a few hours. Here are some updates: Many of the domains I listed are duplicates of domains managed by other DNS servers on my network. There was no point in having them in Samba AD, so I deleted the zones in Windows DNS Manager and created slaves in my named.conf.local folder, so that they'd pull the records from my authoritative BIND DNS server,

On 11/05/2015 12:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 05.11.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Steve Ankeny: >> 'network-manager' is not installed but 'resolvconf' is -- >> >> adam at eagle:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf >> # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by >> resolvconf(8) >> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR

Dear Simon, > And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. # pwd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts # diff -u ifcfg-eno1 ifcfg-eno4 --- ifcfg-eno1??? 2020-09-21 17:23:25.576672703 +0200 +++ ifcfg-eno4??? 2020-09-22 07:18:43.160532532 +0200 @@ -3,15 +3,20 @@ ?BROWSER_ONLY=no ?BOOTPROTO=none ?DEFROUTE=no -IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes -IPV6INIT=no -IPV6_AUTOCONF=no +IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no

Hi, The new version ipp2p 0.8.0 is released. Klaus -- www.ipp2p.com

Dear Simon, every second IP-address is unwanted. We restarted? eno4: nmcli con down eno4; nmcli con up eno4 and the second address vanishes. Then after a few ours, the second ip address reappears. This is the config-file of eno2: # cat ifcfg-eno2 TYPE=Ethernet PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

Hello, I'm in trouble here with what appears to be a total meltdown of my DNS on my Domain Controllers. I only have two DCs right now and I cannot resolve anything on either of them. I am on Ubuntu 16.04 with a compiled version of Samba 4.10.4. I also have a compiled version of BIND 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <id:ebd72b3> # service bind9 status ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server ?

On Tue, October 11, 2016 15:23, Richard Mann wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Walter H. >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:05 AM >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ... >> >> Hello, >> >> has anybody a

Hi, I have installed CentOS 6.2 x86_64 and KVM/Qemu and I have some troubles with network. The first case: ----------------- The configuration is: - CentOS 6.2 (hardware machine) has one Ethernet interface with static IP address (eth0). - Virtual machine has bridge network interface with eth0 interface on CentOS 6.2. This bridge is created using wizard integrated with virt-manager. - Bridge

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 19:11, TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > > > Whoooosh, senior moment!! > > Here's the link: > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/MMNEJmqIrEzK-A4N3MR0ZA > > I just recently disabled IPV6 due to errors resolving I saw in the logs. > This was AFTER mail quit working the second time. It did not correct the > problem.

On 11/05/2015 11:38 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 05/11/15 16:21, Steve Ankeny wrote: >> I'm following the instructions here -- >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller >> >> >> I've successfully "tested" my domain controller -- >> >> adam at eagle:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U%

Hi! I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the corresponding configuration for the master is ( /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): TYPE=Bond BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME=bond0 DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=10.3.20.131 PREFIX=24

I'm having some issues with Internet access from CentOS7 server which is installed in Vmware Workstation 10.0.3 build-1895310 in Windows 7 x64. At this point I can't get if the error is on CentOS configuration or it's another problem so I leave here what I did in order to get Internet working on that VM. 1) */etc/resolv.conf* # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver

Hi, yesterday i tried to join a domain as a DC with bind9 as dns-backend on Debian Wheezy with samba 4.1.11 from backports. I followed the tutorial in the wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC but didn' find the instruction completely clear, so perhaps i made a mistake during the join. It is written there: "If you choose BIND as DNS backend, instead of the

Hello all, is there a good wirte-up on how edit script files in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory on Centos & to assign multiple IP addresses to the same NIC on boot? Thanks for any and all help. Cheers, Boris.

On 16/02/2020 15:03, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > 1) finding a way for ALL 70+ desktops to look up the DCs properly and switch to a running one if one is not available (otherwise what's the point right?) Hello Samba Mailing List, Just to be clear, I am using Ubuntu Server 18.04.4 LTS running Samba 4.7.6 on both DCs. Is this the Samba version I should be using for this

I have a bind server running that cannot resolve www.atbfinancialonline.com. I turned on "debug 10" in the named.conf and start up dig on it, but dig just times out, what else can I do to see why exactly it won't resolve this? Thanks! jlc

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 18:52, TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Stephen > > John Smoogen > > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 6:24 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working > > > >

Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > If you are only going to have one DC, then the internal DNS server is > okay, it just doesn't work as well as Bind9. Once you have more than > one DC (which is the recommendation), then it is better to use Bind9. I have two other servers. Once the ad-cd server is up the I plan to have the other servers moved to ad and act as alternate dcs > Louis