similar to: TLS for all CentOS websites but not for smtp?

On 19/08/15 17:50, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 08/19/2015 09:24 AM, Kai Bojens wrote: >> On 19-08-15 08:30:27, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >>> e-mail by its very design is not secure, SMTP creates "Man In The >>> Middle" at every server along the way. >> >> DANE exists and mail servers like postfix support this. My logfiles >> show

On 19-08-15 08:30:27, Alice Wonder wrote: > e-mail by its very design is not secure, SMTP creates "Man In The > Middle" at every server along the way. DANE exists and mail servers like postfix support this. My logfiles show me that mail.centos.org delivers straight to me without any servers along the way. > I'm not saying they shouldn't implement TLS on the list

Hello everybody, I just got the email about the enforcing of HTTPS for the CentOS Websites which I really appreciate: ?The CentOS Project infra team has decided to implement TLS wherever we can (?)? Does anybody know if and when mail.centos.org will be able to deliver its mails with STARTTLS? There seems to be no support for STARTTLS at all: $: openssl s_client -connect mail.centos.org:25

On 08/19/2015 09:24 AM, Kai Bojens wrote: > On 19-08-15 08:30:27, Alice Wonder wrote: > >> e-mail by its very design is not secure, SMTP creates "Man In The >> Middle" at every server along the way. > > DANE exists and mail servers like postfix support this. My logfiles > show me that mail.centos.org delivers straight to me without any > servers along the

On 08/19/2015 06:56 AM, Kai Bojens wrote: > Hello everybody, > I just got the email about the enforcing of HTTPS for the CentOS Websites > which I really appreciate: > > ?The CentOS Project infra team has decided to implement TLS wherever we > can (?)? > > Does anybody know if and when mail.centos.org will be able to deliver its > mails with STARTTLS? There seems to be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/08/15 15:56, Kai Bojens wrote: > Hello everybody, I just got the email about the enforcing of HTTPS > for the CentOS Websites which I really appreciate: > > ?The CentOS Project infra team has decided to implement TLS > wherever we can (?)? > > Does anybody know if and when mail.centos.org will be able to > deliver its

On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: > On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >> self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA. >> > A private CA is the

This is an epel package but I thought that I would ask here first. I am encountering unexpected behaviour from this program and I would like to know if it is a bug, or I am configuring something wrong, of if this is intended behaviour. ldns-dane version 1.6.16 (ldns version 1.6.16) When I attempt to specify the entire certificate as the desired data source for this program I get the following

On Tue, September 14, 2010 02:30, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> So, I'm quite keen on finding out what is it that is causing >> the breakage for you > > Karanbir, in the middle of the thread from the archive: > > James B. Byrne at Mon Sep 13 12:59:25 EDT 2010 >> Did that via webmin's command interface and nothing

I encountered a couple of strange events with respect to password authentication this morning. Two of our staff were unable to login onto several systems using their usual passwords. Both users had last logged in on these hosts using their accounts and passwords on Friday past. The two accounts could not log on to any of the servers for which they had access and the message log on each showed

On 17/06/16 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: >> On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >>> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >>> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >>> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >>> self-signed

On Fri, May 8, 2015 13:23, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Devin Reade wrote: >> --On Friday, May 08, 2015 09:58:32 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne" >> <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >>> While attempting to debug something else I ran across this: >>> >>> ssh -vvv somehost >>> . . . >>> debug1: Connection established.

On 04/12/2019 22:03, Lists wrote: > I have a goal of securing email. Updated the company mail server and DNS > (CentOS 7 + Postfix, otherwise pretty stock) with support for SPF, DKIM, and > DMARC. So far, all good, and everything "just works". > > Our mail server has supported SMTP / TLS for a long time, but recently I've > been considering requring TLS all the

Am 03.03.2015 um 18:16 schrieb James B. Byrne: > CentOS-6.5 (FreePBX-2.6) > Asterisk-11.14.2 (FreePBX) > snom870-SIP 8.7.3.25.5 > > I am having a very difficult time attempting to get TLS and SRTP > working with Asterisk and anything else. At the moment I am trying to > get TLS functioning with our Snom870 desk-sets. And I am not having > much luck. > > Since this

On Tue, March 3, 2015 13:37, James Cloos wrote: >>>>>> "JBB" == James B Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> writes: > > JBB> tcpenable=yes > JBB> tlsenable=yes > JBB> tlscertfile=/etc/pki/asterisk/ca.harte-lyne.hamilton.asterisk.crt > JBB> tlscafile=/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt > JBB> tlsdontverifyserver=yes > JBB>

This seems to me to be getting down to some sort of problem with configuring the Snom-870. when I register the device 41712 (set up for transport=tls only) then I see this in the SIP trace: Sent to udp:192.168.6.9:5060 at 4/3/2015 09:07:36:813 (836 bytes): REGISTER sip:voinet09.internal.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca:5061 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.112:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-udx92poqese6;rport

Hi I want to create a nice picture about my result of k -the nearest neighbours algorithm. Here is my easy code: ################################# library(klaR) library(ipred) library(mlbench) data(PimaIndiansDiabetes2) dane=na.omit(PimaIndiansDiabetes2)[,c(2,5,9)] dane[,2]=log(dane[,2]) dane[,1:2]=scale(dane[,1:2]) zbior.uczacy=sample(1:nrow(dane),nrow(dane)/2,F)

Hi everybody! I want to find a closer neighbourins observation. This is my code: ########################## library(klaR) library(ipred) library(mlbench) data(PimaIndiansDiabetes2) dane=na.omit(PimaIndiansDiabetes2)[,c(2,5,9)] dane[,2]=log(dane[,2]) dane[,1:2]=scale(dane[,1:2]) zbior.uczacy=sample(1:nrow(dane),nrow(dane)/2,F)

CentOS-6.5 (FreePBX-2.6) Asterisk-11.14.2 (FreePBX) snom870-SIP 8.7.3.25.5 I am having a very difficult time attempting to get TLS and SRTP working with Asterisk and anything else. At the moment I am trying to get TLS functioning with our Snom870 desk-sets. And I am not having much luck. Since this is an extraordinarily (to me) Byzantine environemnt I am going to ask if any of you have gotten

Has anyone on this list got sendmail and cyrus-imapd configured so that email addressed in the form username+folder at example.com gets delivered directly to cyrus' user.username.inbox.folder? I have been tinkering with this on and off for about a week and no matter what I have tried, all traffic addressed in the +folder format ends up in user.username.inbox instead. If anyone has gotten