similar to: "UMask=0002" ignored in httpd service file

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows >> 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: >> "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for

Hi, I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick raid-1 as storage. Has anyone any experience with this? Since the machines will be running pretty much only iptables, conntrackd and keepalived there is not going to be a lot of disk activity going on and the plan is to do all the

Hi, I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata gets mixed up. Are there any alternatives? Some

Good evening from Singapore, Anybody downloaded, installed, and tried CentOS 8.0 1905 yet? Download link from CentOS download mirror near to Singapore: http://mirror.vodien.com/centos/8.0.1905/isos/x86_64/CentOS-8-x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso The DVD ISO filesize is 6.6 GB. I am downloading it right now...Approx. 20 mins more to download completion using 1 Gbps home fiber internet connection.

<preamble> I have deployed Linux/Apache/PHP (node1) + MySQL (node2) with Security Groups (AWS) or iptables controlling who can connect to the MySQL server. In topology terms -- a 2 Tier architecture. In AWS - one can deploy several such instances behind a ELB. Each LAP instance talks to a MySQL RDS. The LAP instances are either mod_php or PHP-FPM. OS -- CentOS, Ubuntu. Debian

On 27.02.2018 16:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only >> tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. >> Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum

On 15 Apr 2015 13:22, "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > On 15.04.2015 12:41, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Hi there, > > Yesterday I've updated from 7 to 7.1 and today I've noticed on 2 server > > that postgresql systemd file was replaced with default values. This make > > postgres to no start and webserver give me

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:00 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 4/15/2015 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> Mostly I'm interested in avoiding surprises and having code that isn't >> married to the weirdness of any particular version of any particular >> distribution. And I found this to be pretty surprising, given that I >> could

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

Hi, today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for Windows" Previously the disk drive was using the Red Hat virtio drivers which worked just fine but after the reboot after the update I just get a blue screen indicating that Windows cannot

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

Hi, I'm trying to use cgroups to limit the apache webserver but this doesn't seem to work as far as I can tell. I modified cgconfig.conf like this: group webserver { cpu { cpu.shares="250"; } } and addes this to cgrules.conf: *:httpd * webserver Looking into the "webserver" cgroup shows that the pid's of

Hi, I'm trying to setup the provisioning of new OpenStack hypervisors with cinder volumes on them. The problem is that kickstart doesn't allow dashed in volume group names? I tried this: volgroup cinder-volumes --pesize=4096 pv.02 and this: volgroup cinder--volumes --pesize=4096 pv.02 but in both cases I end up with a volume group named "cindervolumes" on the system. Any

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > I think the problem is that you simply have to draw a distinction > between technology and product. > The rise of the Linux desktop will never happen because Linux is not a > product but a technology and as a result has to be a jack of all trades. I'm unconvinced. True, Chromebooks

CentOS 8.0 1905 is using Linux Kernel 4.18? Not Linux Kernel 5.x? On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > Already bummed that the 4.18 kernel is too old for /proc/pressure :( > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi, I'm currently looking for a RAID controller with BBU/CacheVault and while LSI MegaRaid controllers worked well in the past apparently they are no longer supported in RHEL 8: https://access.redhat.com/discussions/3722151 Does anybody have recommendations for for hardware controllers with cache that should work in both CentOS 7 and 8 out of the box? Regards, Dennis

On 09.12.2015 13:47, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > > > Op 09-12-15 om 01:00 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >>> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular