similar to: Firewalld broken on Centos7?

I just noticed that when rebooting a CentOS 7 server the firewall comes back up with both interfaces set to REJECT, instead of the eth1 interface set to ACCEPT as defined in 'permanent' firewalld configuration files. All servers are up to date. By "just noticed" I mean that I finally investigated why a newly rebooted VM failed to allow NFS connections. Prior to doing that.

On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/11/2015 03:00 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I just noticed that when rebooting a CentOS 7 server the firewall comes back up with both interfaces set to REJECT, instead of the eth1 interface set to ACCEPT as defined in 'permanent' firewalld configuration files. > > Rather than paraphrasing, could you show the specific

Hi I would like to add rules into the iptables of the Hosted Engine VM in Ovirt. the version is oVirt Engine Version: 4.1.1.8-1.el7.centos I have tried using the normal process for iptables (iptables-save etc), but it seems that the file /etc/sysconfig/iptables this is ignored in the Ovirt Engine VM. How can I add permanent rules into the Engine VM? Kind regards Andrew

I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It this in the IN_public chain: Chain IN_public (2 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 81 3423 IN_public_log all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 81 3423 IN_public_deny all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

hi everybody I have a simple network: <network> <name>default</name> <uuid>1e71fa47-4893-4435-8b60-575d2b51c231</uuid> <forward mode='nat'> <nat> <port start='1024' end='65535'/> </nat> </forward> <bridge name='virbr0' stp='on' delay='0' /> <mac

On 10/11/2015 03:00 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: > I just noticed that when rebooting a CentOS 7 server the firewall comes back up with both interfaces set to REJECT, instead of the eth1 interface set to ACCEPT as defined in 'permanent' firewalld configuration files. Rather than paraphrasing, could you show the specific rules, chains, or policies you're talking about? A standard

After a recent large update, firewalld's status contains many lines of the form: WARNING: COMMAND_FAILED: '/usr/sbin/iptables... Checking iptables.service status shows it to be masked. I realize that firewalld uses iptables, but should it be enabled and started as a service? Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jcu at labadie.us 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H)

On 12/19/2017 03:37 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 15:05 -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: >> I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It >> this in the IN_public chain: >> >> Chain IN_public (2 references) >> pkts bytes target prot opt >> in out source destination >> 81 3423

Hello, I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system. I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system all is working ? BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7 1511 on this systems fail2ban don't work anymore. I have this error or more, in the firewalld 2015-12-19 08:39:55 ERROR: COMMAND_FAILED: '/sbin/iptables -w2 -t filter -I

Yesterday I noticed that I was not able to ping one of our development servers so I logged in via VNC and ran the Firewalld GUI. To my surprise, except for the interface definition for public and trusted zones, nothing seemed to be configured. That is, none of the services were checked off that we want open at the firewall. Also, this server is a gateway and masquerading and forwarding appears

On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 15:05 -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It > this in the IN_public chain: > > Chain IN_public (2 references) > pkts bytes target prot opt > in out source destination > 81 3423 IN_public_log all > -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

ip_forward was not enabled, now it is. Still same result: On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.1' and ping 192.168.1.1 from the client: 5:28:42.646203 IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 1584, seq 1, length 64 15:28:43.663014 IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 1584, seq 2, length 64 15:28:44.688133 IP 172.16.0.3 >

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 03:14:12PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 14, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Jon LaBadie <jcu at labadie.us> wrote: > > > > After a recent large update, firewalld's status contains > > many lines of the form: > > > > WARNING: COMMAND_FAILED: '/usr/sbin/iptables? > > What?s the rest of the command? Well, there are about 20 of

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

Hello Julien, Am Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:23 +0100 schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > In that case I see: > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq1, length 64 > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq2, length 64 > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq3, length 64 > > Packet goes

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777 Bug ID: 1777 Summary: Error: COMMAND_FAILED: 'python-nftables' failed Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: arm OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at

I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld. I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific ip blocks. The offenders are 45.0.0.0/24, 49.0.0.0/24, 51.0.0.0/24, 111.0.0.0/24 and 118.0.0.0/24, and they amounted to a multiple thousands of attempts per day. I installed and configured fail2ban, but still saw a lot of attempts in the logs, and the ipset created was

On Dec 14, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Jon LaBadie <jcu at labadie.us> wrote: > > After a recent large update, firewalld's status contains > many lines of the form: > > WARNING: COMMAND_FAILED: '/usr/sbin/iptables? What?s the rest of the command? > Checking iptables.service status shows it to be masked. That?s probably from package iptables-services, which isn?t

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12

I'm having a few issues with firewalld on a CentOS 7 install, in particular when using systemctl to start/check the status of the daemon: Checking the firewalld daemon status ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: failed