similar to: Clunky Xorg with latest 6.7 upgrade?

On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > Top shows > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java > > Well, what's process

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:02 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > Top shows > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > > 23391

On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > Top shows > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java Well, what's process 23391, and does Xorg stop using a lot of CPU time if you terminate it?

Since the latest update (may wrap here), xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:16:01 PM EDT xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:15:58 PM EDT x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05 PM EST xvidcore-1.2.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:55:49 PM EST . . . drop a lot of older

Hi All, I am working on creating storage driver domain with xen-4.3.0 . I am referring this - http://wiki.xen.org/wiki?title=Storage_driver_domains&oldid=9371 I have created Storage domain with xl utility of xen, then followed above wiki for rest of the steps, additionally I did install blktap-dkms package also- Following xen processes are running on Domain 0:

Hi All, I am working on creating storage driver domain with xen-4.3.0 . I am referring this - http://wiki.xen.org/wiki?title=Storage_driver_domains&oldid=9371 I have created Storage domain with xl utility of xen, then followed above wiki for rest of the steps, additionally I did install blktap-dkms package also- Following xen processes are running on Domain 0:

On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > Since the latest update (may wrap here), > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 > 04:16:01 PM EDT > xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 > 04:15:58 PM EDT > x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05 > PM EST >

Hi, In our company we are currently running a Samba server and Windows XP clients. At the moment we are having problems with mapping Samba shares in Windows. Shares are being mapped through a windows startup script, which executes net use (with the option persistent:no) command. For most users this works most of the time, nevertheless it often fails, the exect reason for this isn't clear

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:05 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > > determined

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:30 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:05 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > ><snip> > > I suggest going into the libreOffice settings and play around with the graphical settings (LibreOffice->View) and turn off Java (LibreOffice->Java) to see if this makes any difference. I pretty much never use the Java features in

On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > determined during the attempt to duplicate due to the lack of a data > feed Saturday and

What video card are you using? Xorg driver or proprietary binary thing? The next thing I'd do is boot the last kernel under which you saw "normal" performance. If booting the older kernel doesn't fix the problem, then the problem is probably the X11 server. At that point, I'd start using "yum downgrade" to revert individual components, and reboot until you

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 07:51 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > <snip> > Ksnapshot region selection still lagging and jerky. > > So it would be easy to think some of this A.M.'s updates had a > beneficial effect in one regard, CPU, usage, but not in the clunky > behavior of region selection with Ksnapshot (could be a mouse driver > issue introduced with the 6.7

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:39 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:02 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > <snip> > Anyway, logging the user out and back in, the panel shows no checking > for updates. Ksnapshot selection for the other user still lagging and > jerky. CPU usage now bouncing 49%-53% with only this message composing > going on and the

hi Jones, Sorry for the late reply. when I used your method to execute command: $guestfish -N fs:xfs -m /dev/sda1 statvfs / libguestfs: error: mkfs: xfs: /dev/sda1: mkfs.xfs: No such file or directory guestfish: error creating prepared disk image 'fs:xfs' on 'test1.img': failed to create filesystem (xfs): mkfs: xfs: /dev/sda1: mkfs.xfs: No such file or directory does I need to

For me, this was a memory allocation problem. I am using a private heap, and somewhere between build 11522 and 11700, the allocation for two large buffers was changed from calloc to speex_alloc (I am sure that this was a cleanup change, and I have not had a chance to locate it yet). This was overrunning my heap, and enlarging the heap solved the problem. I suspect that Itay is having a

Jim Crichton a ?crit : > Itay, > > I tested on C6x in May with build 11343 and 11398, and it worked > fine. I just ran the same test with build 11768, and there was no > cancellation, just as you saw. I will try to track this down in the > next day or two. In the meantime, I suggest that you try testing > with 11398. Hmm, that's odd because the fixed-point seems to

Itay, I tested on C6x in May with build 11343 and 11398, and it worked fine. I just ran the same test with build 11768, and there was no cancellation, just as you saw. I will try to track this down in the next day or two. In the meantime, I suggest that you try testing with 11398. - Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: Itay Chamiel To: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Monday, August 14,

Itay Chamiel a ?crit : > Hi Jim, > > I've tried both 11343 and 11398 (after fixing a couple of compiler > errors) and annoyingly enough I get the same results as the current > build: float works, fixed doesn't. I also saw the same phenomenon where > the st->W and st->PHI arrays are all zeroes in fixed point mode. > > I'm still optimistic though, as

R lets one lock an environment with both an R function, base::lockEnvironment, and a C function, R_LockEnvironment, but, as far as I can tell, no corresponding function to unlock an environment. Is this omission on principle or just something that has not been done yet? I ask because several packages, including the well-used R6 and rlang packages, fiddle with some bits in with SET_ENVFLAGS and