similar to: how to get bug fixed by TUV

The Redhat guys are normally responding very well to bug reports from Centos users. They don't seem to differentiate. Using bugs.centos.org seems quite pointless. I normally just use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/. On 30 July 2015 at 13:12, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > > hi all, > > > > i have a

On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > hi all, > > i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq): > > we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering > what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update), > so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the very > least to get

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Akemi Yagi <toracat at elrepo.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Stijn De Weirdt <stijn.deweirdt at ugent.be> wrote: >> latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while >> previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). >> >> the issue is with modules from mellanox

hi johnny, >> anyone any hints how to debug this or some clues what could be going >> wrong here. > > Do you have an exclude in /etc/yum.conf for ibutils-libs? how embarassing. there was indeed an exclude on ibutils-libs. (this must be some leftover from using mlnx ofed. we are switching from c73+mlnx ofed 3.4 to c74 stock ib (there's no mlnxofed3.4 for c74, and our old

hi all, can someone help explaining what we are seeing? it makes no sense to us. this is a host running centos 7.4 with 3.10.0-693.17.1 kernel, and it has 192GB of ram > [] free -b > total used free shared buff/cache available > Mem: 201402642432 14413479936 75642777600 48586752 111346384896 185689632768 > Swap: 21474832384 31961088

On 02/15/2017 03:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/15/2017 02:39 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of >> the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on >> x86_64 does not produce this rpm. >> >> i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but

hi all, latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). the issue is with modules from mellanox kmod rpms that are symlinked in the weak-updates dir. the config files in /etc/depmod.d look ok (and do work with previous version): dist.conf has weak-updates after built-in, and mellanox kmod rpms ship a

hi all, i'm trying to rebuild the current sssd-client.i686 rpm that is part of the x86_64 repo, but i fail to do so. rebuilding the sssd.src.rpm on x86_64 does not produce this rpm. i can rebuild sssd.src.rpm with --target=i686, but that sssd-client rpm has conflicts and a whole bunch of i686 deps that the rpm from the centos repo doesn't have. tips/help welcome stijn

hi all, i'm trying to understand an issue i'm having with a yum repo (it's a mirror of the c74 repo). there's an rpm in the repo (ibutils-libs in this case); but the client using this repo says it cannot find this rpm (i did yum info ibutils-libs --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c74 to exclude all other repos). other rpms are ok to use, so nothing structural going wrong (i think)

Hi folks, For complicated reasons, I'd like to have a service (lightdm) start after sshd starts. (This is on CentOS 7.) I've tried adding "sshd.service" to the lists of "Active=" and "Require=" items in /etc/systemd/system/lightdm.service (which started as a copy of /usr/lib/systemd/system/lightdm.service), but these changes don't seem to have

I'm not sure if the following is a bug or a feature: > jjmat <- array(1:6, c(2,3), list(c('ABC', 'DEF'), c('xyz', 'tuv', 'qrs'))) > jjdf <- as.data.frame(jjmat) > jjmat['AB', ] Error: subscript out of bounds > jjdf['AB',] xyz tuv qrs ABC 1 3 5 > jjmat[, 'tu'] Error: subscript out of bounds

I was playing around with the ghyp package and simulated series of t-distributed variables when suddenly i was not able to reproduce the log likelihood values reported by the package. When trying to reproduce the likelihood values, I summed the log(dt(x,v)) values and it worked with some simulated series but not all. Is there any obvious flaws with this script? library("ghyp")

I need to upgrade PHP because the latest WordPress requires one at least at 5.2.4. What are the tradeoffs of using the php53 packages provided by CentOS versus IUS? I've seen that installing the RHEL-derived php53 requires removing php first and it creates package conflicts because it doesn't provide a virtual php-common package. That suggests I should install the IUS package. Is

Hi I thought this might be of general interest. Recently I purchased an X100P from a Digium reseller in the UK. Very pleased with the card; works perfectly. My friend (known for his deep pockets and short arms) purchased an X100P card from Ebay. He's had no end of problems with line noise, dropped called etc so I thought I would compare the two cards. Plus mine was delivered within two

Hello a newbie here. The situation is that: 2 machine one master one client Puppet 0.24.5 This my configuration: Client: /etc/puppet/puppetd.conf [puppetd] server = Asus-Vista-Box logdir = /var/log/puppet vardir = /var/lib/puppet rundir = /var/run master /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/sudo.pp class sudo { file { "/etc/sudoers": owner => "root",

We have these transforms from funnel shift to a simpler shift op: // fshl(X, 0, C) -> shl X, C // fshl(X, undef, C) -> shl X, C // fshl(0, X, C) -> lshr X, (BW-C) // fshl(undef, X, C) -> lshr X, (BW-C) These were part of: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54778 In all cases, one operand must be 0 or undef and the shift amount is a constant, so I think these are safe.

Don't we need to distinguish funnel shift from the more specific rotate? I'm not seeing how rotate (a single input op shifted by some amount) gets into trouble like funnel shift (two variables concatenated and shifted by some amount). Eg, if in pseudo IR we have: %funnel_shift = fshl %x, %y, %sh ; this is problematic because either x or y can be poison, but we may not touch the poison when

There's a question about the behavior of funnel shift [1] + select and poison here that reminds me of previous discussions about select and poison [2]: https://github.com/AliveToolkit/alive2/pull/32#discussion_r257528880 Example: define i8 @fshl_zero_shift_guard(i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %sh) { %c = icmp eq i8 %sh, 0 %f = fshl i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %sh %s = select i1 %c, i8 %x, i8 %f ; shift amount is 0

The proposed mitigation for variant 2 of CVE-2017-5715, “branch target injection”, is to send all indirect branches through an instruction sequence known as a retpoline. Because the purpose of a retpoline is to prevent attacker-controlled speculation, we also end up losing the benefits of benign speculation, which can lead to a measurable loss of performance. We can regain some of those benefits

If I got poison propagation right, it's probably only by luck! Hopefully, the funnel shift bug is fixed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL354905 Nuno, IIUC this means that you do *not* need to change the funnel shift semantics in Alive. So I think that means we're still on track to go with John's suggestion that only select and phi can block poison? (I don't know of any