similar to: rsyslog.conf

On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 09:05 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > However, forcing your correspondents to wade through an interminable > wall of text that regurgitates the previous thread before getting to > the point of the message arguably interferes with proper understanding > no less than top-posting does. There is absolutely no need to include irrelevant text when replying to a

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I dont beleave it. Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, > Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or 3269 ) No, but now yes and does not work: gaio at albus:~$ ldapsearch -x -H ldap://vdcsv1:3268/ -b

On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 11:08 +0100, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > I dont beleave it. > > Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > > > > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, > > Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or

On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:08:26 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > I dont beleave it. > > Eh. «De gustibus non disputandum est». ;-) > > > > The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want > > access without auth, Have you tried to

On 03/09/17 12:29, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 02/09/2017 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: >> On 03/09/17 03:56, William Dunlap via R-help wrote: >>> Is the reason you want a block comment containing code (as opposed to >>> arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out >>> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you

On 07/23/2015 09:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- <snip> >>>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >>> >>> Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) <snip> >> >> Perhaps I should say instead that it "strongly

Am 23.07.2015 um 18:06 schrieb "Valeri Galtsev" <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>: > > On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> The main reason actually is chronological order. But not just for the >> reply .. but for IN-LINE posting. >> >> In a discussion where you need to make points in-line and where you only >> need

On 7/23/2015 12:15 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 23.07.2015 um 18:06 schrieb "Valeri Galtsev" >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>: >>> On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> The main reason actually is chronological order. But not just for the >>>> reply .. but for IN-LINE posting.

On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/23/2015 09:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- > <snip> >>>>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >>>> >>>> Outlook forces you to write above ? :-)

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 23.07.2015 um 18:06 schrieb "Valeri Galtsev" > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>: >> >> On Thu, July 23, 2015 10:45 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> The main reason actually is chronological order. But not just for the >>> reply .. but for IN-LINE posting. >>> >>> In a discussion where you need to

On Thu, July 23, 2015 8:43 am, Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Leon Fauster >>Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:20 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] rsyslog.conf >> >>Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave

Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) <Dave.Windsor at us.bosch.com>: > Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) -- LF

Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) wrote: >> Behalf Of Leon Fauster >>Am 22.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Windsor Dave (AdP/TEF7) >> <Dave.Windsor at us.bosch.com>: >>> Sorry for the top post, Outlook defaults strike again..... >> >>Outlook forces you to write above ? :-) > > Perhaps I should say instead that it "strongly encourages" top posting, >

I dont beleave it. That 5 years old now, normaly i'll dig into it, but exim... I dropped exim about 15 years ago.. First thing i do on debian... apt-get install --purge postfix That installs postfix and removes exim and purges exims config.. ;-) The setup for the Ad in the link below is the same but if you want access without auth, Have you tried to query the GC ports. ( 3268 or 3269

Hi Mark, I'm not sure whether upstream is the right place to address this, but I'll try. I just downloaded all versions of the rsyslog sources from rsyslog.com, and found 'googlesyndication' links in the following versions: rsyslog-4.8.0 rsyslog-5.10.0 rsyslog-5.10.1 rsyslog-5.8.13 rsyslog-6.6.0 rsyslog-7.3.0 rsyslog-7.3.1 rsyslog-7.3.2 rsyslog-7.3.3 rsyslog-7.3.4 rsyslog-7.3.5

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:2501 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2501 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fa57fea42b1cdd050e9c8d1bf9a1ec4fc0bec10db00c4d2eea4c6cc94203746b rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3061 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3061 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 276f321f41112dde88d867c01d9afa0ea673ac318185f9ee5f6ff54c0ce7c0d0 rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:0852 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0852 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 6fbc74c3da61f3c9d05998789ae1a0112613ff9b5afb3f61f29b761f0222974d rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.4.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:2660 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2660 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 9438f230bd6e32ba33aa6e9e9406a33da90801760a64e52c89c89d6b189c4e41 rsyslog-8.24.0-52.el7_8.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1397 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1397.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 948575ad1feeb02cbe239668584e1b84268e3bec81215d02d5d06cea0b8f533c rsyslog-7.4.7-7.el7_0.x86_64.rpm