similar to: RHEL 6.7 is released

--On Thursday, July 23, 2015 11:40:21 PM -0700 Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > >> In upgrading from RHEL 6.6 to 6.7, I did find that I had to disable >> my 3rd party repos (elrepo and epel) in order to avoid yum erroring >> out. > > Can you elaborate on this? What yum

Am 10.11.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org>: > > bat is a native GUI, so UNIX only. we use bat GUI on windows ... -- LF

I've got a fresh CentOS 7 test machine, fully patched. The command: shutdown -h now surprisingly does not halt the machine. Instead it reboots it. WTF? I found the following Debian discussion which seems to be the same issue: <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766338> However, removing kexec-tools in this case did not solve the problem. Nor does

On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > > The one thing I would point out regarding the above link is that despite > conventional UNIX wisdom, *don't* put /usr on a separate filesystem > in CentOS 7. <sarcasm>Thank you RedHat</sarcasm> > > Flames to /dev/null. Sorry, you don?t get to throw that grenade and then run away. The

--On Monday, May 11, 2015 02:26:17 PM -0700 John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > never met a unix that didn't come with Perl already installed, or as a > base option SunOS-4 :) Didn't have emacs, either, nor an ANSI-C compiler. And the OS came on QIC-150 tape (ie: 150 MB total capacity). Not that that defeats the argument ... Devin

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > In upgrading from RHEL 6.6 to 6.7, I did find that I had to disable > my 3rd party repos (elrepo and epel) in order to avoid yum erroring > out. Can you elaborate on this? What yum error(s) did you see? I updated a RHEL 6.6 system with ELRepo enabled (but no EPEL packages) to RHEL 6.7 using 'yum update'

It's time to purchase hardware again, and I'm going through the usual "of that which is on the market, what will CentOS run without leaving new hardware collecting dust for a year"? I'm looking at a number of commodity-grade machines (ie: desktop grade will suffice) with reasonably fast CPUs and able to use at least 8GB each (preferably 32GB). These will be deployed as

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up >> backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on >> Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for >> the users to restore files from the server to their own machine? > >

I have a CentOS 6 machine that was initially installed as CentOS 6.4 in May of 2013. It's /boot filesystem is 200M which, IIRC, was the default /boot size at the time. The most recent kernel update (2.6.32-573.18.1.el6) fails because of lack of space in /boot. The workaround is edit /etc/yum.conf, reduce installonly_limit from 5 to something lower (I used 3), remove the oldest kernel via

Hi all! I'm still on C6. I'm using a RAID1 configuration (Linux software RAID) and I'd like to either use the same one, or possibly configure it on new drives (larger) when I upgrade to C7. (I'm really feeling the need to move off C6.) But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in Anaconda, and I don't find any user reports or other info on this in the

#define TL;DR Despite idmapd running, usernames/IDs don't get mapped properly. Looking for a workaround. #undef TL;DR I'm trying to get a new CentOS 7.1 workstation running, and having some problems with NFS filesystems. The server is a fully patched CentOS 6 server. On the NFS filesystem, there are two subdirectories owned by a regular user (joe). (There are actually more and by

I'm not sure if this is helpful to anyone else and I can't decide if it's mildly clever or just a stupid pet trick, really. I recently decided to reinstall my work laptop with centos. as part of the install I used an 8g sandisk USB drive; it's roughly the size of a wireless mouse receiver. I put /boot, / and /usr on the USB drive, set encrypted partitions for swap, /home, /opt,

Hello, Are there any KVM over IP switches that are not thousands of dollars? Ideally a 3-4 port switch for a few hundred seems reasonable to me. Mike -- Michael B Allen Java Active Directory Integration http://www.ioplex.com/

I am now investigating encrypting our IMAP user spool files. Does anyone have experience with handling encrypted data stores using either or both of the subject methods and would care tio share their observations? Which is the preferred method (I know: it depends, but on what?)? What administrative pain does each cause? Our IMAP host is a KVM guest so spinning up a duplicate and simply

We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off the NAS. We recently upgraded all these machines from CentOS 5.7 to CentOS 6.5. We did a "piecemeal" upgrade, usually upgrading five or so machines at a time, every few

I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux machines, (via SMB) for a couple of Windows PC's, and (via ftp) for web sites at my hosting provider. SMART+ reporting shows

--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:53:20 PM -0800 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > That depends on what you mean by "support." > > It's almost certainly possible to run the binaries on CentOS, but if you > need any technical support from the vendor of that application, they > might not provide it. Your first step should be to talk to them

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=845 Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gdr at gno.org --- Comment #12 from Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> 2011-05-03 14:08:48 EST --- [More details for

I noticed that (in a case with a two disk md mirror and lvm), the CentOS 7 installer is now placing /boot as the *last* partition on the disk. I'm assuming that others are seeing this behavior. Does anyone know why it's now the last instead of the first? (Seems to work, though.) Devin

Saturday I did an upgrade from 5.3 (original install) to 5.4. Saturday night, /etc/cron.weekly reported the following: /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md0 md0 holds /boot and resides, mirrored, on sda1 and sdb1. md1 holds an LVM volume containing the remaining filesytems, including swap. The underlying hardware is just a few months hold,