similar to: mcrypt 2.6.8 on centos 6

Hi, Could someone tell me how I'd go about compiling php with mcrypt support from src.rpm? ie. configure -with-mcrypt[=DIR] Is it just a matter of calling rpmbuild --rebuild src.rpm --with=mcrypt ? Cheers, MaZe.

Hi, I need this to install for a new ecommerce store I want to test out: mcrypt for extension=php_mcrypt.dll in php.ini Do you know where I can get this rpm? I cannot find it on the CentOS repository. I am using php 5.2.3-4 and mysql 4.1.20 on CentOS 4.3. Thank you! Sincerely, Melinda Odom Design Hosting, Inc. www.designhosting.biz 479-471-0891 No virus found in this outgoing message.

I see that there are a plethora of php extensions available as rpms, from the centos repositories, but not the php-mcrypt extension. I'm trying to stick to an rpm-only system and haven't found one that provides this, yet, for my 4.4 system. Is there any plan to add this to the repository in the near future (if at all)? Does anyone know where I can get it, otherwise? I see there is one for

If one stays with Centos 5.x (currently on 5.6) is the problem/enhancement/incompatibility involving PHP53 likely to be resolved by general updates and/or the introduction of Centos 5.7 ? Paul.

Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum? Centos 6.5 and now 7 is out but no php-mcrypt. php-mcrypt is used by lots of applications. and the one from EPEL repository is buggy and sometimes makes my server crash.

It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially at 72). I located a source for the php-mcrypt rpm (php-mcrypt-5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm), however, isn't there an easier method to get and install the appropriate rpm - other than downloading it

Dear Friends, The PHP in CENTOS 4.2 hasn't lib php-mcrypt. Where I do download RPM php-mcrypt ? Thanks Adriano

Hello all, I am using the c5-testing repo to fetch PHP 5.2.6 and related libraries, required for the LAMP apps that I want to use. php-mcrypt still seems to come from the extras repo and is version 5.1.6 and the php binary doesn't load this module. Any ideas on howto get php-mcrypt 5.2.6? Thanks. -- "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything" - Alfred

More PHP fun! I can see in the spec files that php-mcrypt support was removed by Redhat. I tried to find out why but I don't have sufficient access to redhat bugzilla. I am wondering if it is actually necessary as I have also run across a post or two that indicates applications that rely on mcrypt still work with the new php53. Perhaps mcrypt was superceded by another module or PHP core

I have Centos 6.8 running on a VPS and upgraded PHP from 5.3 to 5.4 using scl. Unfortunately it seems mcrypt is not available, neither for 5.4 nor for 5.5. What have other users done about that? Unfortunately I have an application that requires mcrypt.

Hi, autoreconf -i -f which is called by autogen.sh gives these errors with git 31c9f0582260817777348c96a3576e5955f44ab3: rm at eurasia:~/swfdec/swfdec$ autoreconf -i -f /usr/share/aclocal/libmcrypt.m4:17: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_LIBMCRYPT run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending%20aclocal

I dunno. I guess it could be. Went to the Gimp site and saw that glib-devel was mentioned there. My tired old brain is a bit confused by this, since most other -devel packages put -devel following the program/package name, and gimp doesn't. I'll give that a try, though, to see if it takes care of my issue. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 2:32?AM Simon Matter <simon.matter at

Hello, I am working on a web system (php) that uses R in the backend, and we need some basic fast encryption/decryption for the underlying mysql database that can be used by both R AND php. It does not need to be top-of-the-line, but just provide some basic level of fast encryption/decryption. Any suggestions? Thank you, Ramiro [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a year with no problems. I don't

Hello, I'm sorry to post this seemingly quite mundane issue, but I just do not find what's wrong with what i did... please help. Basically typing the make command returns a message in french (that one is normal) that says that no goals and no rules were specified. I realize it's a typical make error message but I don't see/am not familiar enough with the output of ./configure to

MyBSD% ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking build system type... i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 checking host system type... i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 checking for a BSD-compatible install...

Well it was lame I was tryng to install...gives me the missing gcc3 error. So now I guess iI have to find gcc3. Maybe I should just go back to RedHat 6.2. This all worked just fine on that. # export CC=gcc3 # ./configure --with-fileio=lame --without-vorbis --disable-gtktest --enable-nasm --enable-expopt=full --prefix=/usr loading cache ./config.cache checking host system type...

question about: http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#translatec++ "With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc." Is this llvm-gcc3 only out of date of is it really only llvm-gcc3? I have 'llvm-g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5546) (LLVM build)' installed on Ubuntu and followed that guide and it creates indeed no .bc file. Regards, -mr

First, thanks for testing this! > Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) > > HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS > * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't > that be llvm-1.9? We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build llvm it will know its version 1.9. > * LLVM was built in Release mode

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Reichenbach <michael_reichenbach at freenet.de> wrote: > question about: > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#translatec++ > "With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc." > > Is this llvm-gcc3 only out of date of is it really only llvm-gcc3? Those instructions are out of date; the current version of llvm-gcc