Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Bond & Team: RX dropped packets"
2018 Jul 12
2
C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
This is that system with the missing management port, and I'm still
fighting it. Everything *looks* right:
3: enp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:25:90:0a:42:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global enp6s0
ip route
192.168.0.0/24 dev enp6s0 proto kernel scope link
2017 Oct 26
2
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
On 10/26/2017 10:38 AM, Ashish Kurian wrote:
> Hi Yalan and Michal,
>
> Thank you for your response. So what I understand is that I can change
> rx_queue size even if I use direct type interface and qemu driver as long
> as the driver is virtio. Am I right?
Yes.
> If that is the case why am I getting
> the error saying that
>
> error: XML document failed to validate
2017 Oct 25
2
Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Dear Users/Developers,
I am using a KVM Ubuntu VM as a degrader to apply specific delays to
incoming packets. As the delay for my packets can be higher than 7.5
seconds, there is not enough buffer on my interface to buffer all the
packets. Therefore those overflowing packets are dropped in the machine and
not forwarded.
When I tried to use the command ethtool -G ens8 rx 512 to increase the
2018 Jul 13
0
C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
Once upon a time, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> said:
> This is that system with the missing management port, and I'm still
> fighting it. Everything *looks* right:
>
> 3: enp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:25:90:0a:42:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd
2016 Jun 07
2
ldapsearch & GSSAPI => Server not found in Kerberos database
Hi all,
I've got on AD DC using Samba 4.4.3 on Centos7 which accept Kerberos
connections (kinit is working), which accept ldapsearch with credentials
but which refuse ldapsearch with GSSAPI.
The issue does not seem to be coming from the client as I discovered this
issue writing a script to test all 22 DC, and all 21 others DC are working
well from that client.
The error:
SASL/GSSAPI
2016 Jun 07
0
ldapsearch & GSSAPI => Server not found in Kerberos database
More information, making me more crazy:
- ldapsearch without SASL is working from any host:
ldapsearch -D 'CN=user-ldapmodify,OU=OurUsers,DC=ad,DC=domain,dc=tld' -w
Passw0rd -x -ZZ -b 'dc=ad,DC=domain,dc=tld' -h dc106
sAMAccountName=administrator dn
- ldapsearch with SASL is not working (Kerberos ticket existing following a
working kinit) from any host but it works when launched
2016 Jun 15
1
ldapsearch & GSSAPI => Server not found in Kerberos database
Solved : )
Reminder of the issue:
Every services (CIFS, Kerberos, LDAP, DNS, RPC) on one DC were working well
and ldapsearch using DN and password were also working.
The only thing which was not working was ldapsearch using GSSAPI
authentication with the following error:
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error (-2)
additional info: SASL(-1): generic
2017 Oct 25
2
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Michal,
What I found was that when I restarted the machine and did a virsh edit
command to see the xml config, I see that it is was not actually changed.
This suggests why I saw 256 again after restarting.
So now I tried again to edit the xml via virsh edit command and used the
following to set the parameters.
<driver name='qemu' txmode='iothread' ioeventfd='on'
2017 Oct 26
2
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Ashish,
IMO, it is yes, no way to increase tx_queue_size for direct type interface
-------
Best Regards,
Yalan Zhang
IRC: yalzhang
Internal phone: 8389413
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Ashish Kurian <ashishbnv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yalan,
>
> In the previous email you mentioned "tx_queue_size='512' will not work in
> the guest with direct type
2017 Oct 25
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
On 10/25/2017 01:53 PM, Ashish Kurian wrote:
> Dear Users/Developers,
>
> I am using a KVM Ubuntu VM as a degrader to apply specific delays to
> incoming packets. As the delay for my packets can be higher than 7.5
> seconds, there is not enough buffer on my interface to buffer all the
> packets. Therefore those overflowing packets are dropped in the machine and
> not
2017 Oct 26
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Michal,
Mine is
iplab@iceman:~$ libvirtd --version
libvirtd (libvirt) 1.3.1
I think this can be the issue. I will update and try again
Best Regards,
Ashish Kurian
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 10/26/2017 10:38 AM, Ashish Kurian wrote:
> > Hi Yalan and Michal,
> >
> > Thank you for your response. So what I
2019 Sep 20
0
7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route
On 20/09/2019 04:55, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being
> set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the
> corresponding configuration for the master is (
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0):
>
> TYPE=Bond
> BOOTPROTO=none
> DEFROUTE=yes
>
2017 Oct 26
1
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Michal,
I installed the latest version from the git and did run the libvirt from
the new directory using /home/to/your/checkout/daemon/libvirtd
But I still see that the version is 1.3.1. I have also stopped the already
running libvirt daemon and ran the new daemon from the directory and it is
showing 1.3.1
Best Regards,
Ashish Kurian
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Ashish Kurian
2019 Sep 20
2
7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route
Hi!
I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being
set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the
corresponding configuration for the master is (
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0):
TYPE=Bond
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
NAME=bond0
DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=10.3.20.131
PREFIX=24
2017 Oct 26
5
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Ashish,
I have tested with your xml in the first mail, and it works for
rx_queue_size(see
below).
multiqueue need to work with vhost backend driver. And when you set
"queues=1" it will ignored.
Please check your qemu-kvm-rhev package, should be newer than
qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.2
And the logs?
tx_queue_size='512' will not work in the guest with direct type interface,
2016 Aug 17
0
Anaconda error on centos 7.2
Hi all,
We are hitting an error in the centos 7 installation with our
kickstart configuration.
===============================================================================
An unknown error has occurred
===============================================================================
anaconda 21.48.22.56-1 exception report
Traceback (most recent call first):
File
2017 Oct 25
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Michal,
An update to what I have already said : when I try adding <driver
name='qemu' txmode='iothread' ioeventfd='on' event_idx='off' queues='1'
rx_queue_size='512' tx_queue_size='512'> although it showed me the error as
mentioned, when I checked the xml again I saw that <driver name='qemu'
txmode='iothread'
2017 Oct 26
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Yalan and Michal,
Thank you for your response. So what I understand is that I can change
rx_queue size even if I use direct type interface and qemu driver as long
as the driver is virtio. Am I right? If that is the case why am I getting
the error saying that
error: XML document failed to validate against schema: Unable to validate
doc against /usr/share/libvirt/schemas/domain.rng
Extra
2017 Oct 26
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Yalan,
Thank you for your response. I do not have the following packages installed
vhost backend driver
qemu-kvm-rhev package
Are these packages available for free? How can I install them?
In my KVM VM, I must have an IP address to the interfaces that I am trying
to increasing the buffers. That is the reason I was using macvtap (direct
type interface). Is it possible to have my interfaces
2017 Oct 26
0
Re: Need to increase the rx and tx buffer size of my interface
Hi Yalan,
In the previous email you mentioned "tx_queue_size='512' will not work in
the guest with direct type interface, in fact, no matter what you set, it
will not work and guest will get the default '256'. "
So if I am using macvtap for my interfaces, then the device type will
always be direct type. Does it mean that there is no way I can increase the
buffer size