Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "/boot on a separate partition?"
2010 Sep 14
7
Transferring system to new drive
Is there a document with instructions for this?
I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
(after mounting the prospective new root partition).
Then I'd have to modify the new /etc/fstab .
Is that a sensible approach?
--
Timothy
2015 Jun 25
3
/boot on a separate partition?
Timothy Murphy gayleard at eircom.net Tue Jun 23 12:49:08 UTC 2015
>
> Do most people today have /boot on a separate partition,
> or do they (you) have it on the / partition ?
Different distros have different defaults. There's no actual right or
wrong here. Pretty much anything you can think of can be made to work.
Jonathan Billings billings at negate.org Tue Jun 23 13:28:18 UTC
2013 Feb 04
3
Questions about software RAID, LVM.
I am planning to increase the disk space on my desktop system. It is
running CentOS 5.9 w/XEN. I have two 160Gig 2.5" laptop (2.5") SATA drives
in two slots of a 4-slot hot swap bay configured like this:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End
2014 Oct 25
1
Upgrading to CentOS-7 on a new partition
I would like to upgrade a CentOS-6.5 home server
to CentOS-7 on a new partition.
What is the simplest way to achieve this?
I would like to be able to boot into either version of CentOS
until I am sure the new version is running OK.
Incidentally, I think most people today must have enough space
on their hard drive to install a new OS on a new partition -
it is surprising that this option never
2015 Jun 24
6
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On 06/23/2015 09:15 AM, Jason Warr wrote:
>> That said, I prefer virtual machines over multiboot environments, and I
>> absolutely despise LVM --- that cursed thing is never getting on my
>> drives. Never again, that is...
>
> I'm curious what has made some people hate LVM so much.
I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who
prefers virtual
2015 Jun 24
6
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
> sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
> hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of
> LVM. What am I missing?
Well, there's best and worst case scenarios. Best case for file-backed
VMs is
2011 May 05
5
How to copy a system?
Is there a standard way of copying a working system
from one machine to another with different partitions?
I have two CentOS-5.6 machines, say A and B,
and I thought I would copy / on sdb10 on machine A
to an unused partition sda7 on machine B with rsync.
I made the appropriate changes to /etc/fstab and grub.conf ,
as well as /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts ,
but found that there were innumerable
2015 Jun 25
2
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:03:18 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, June 24, 2015 16:11, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration
>> > tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something
>> > I don't remember
2015 Jul 03
6
dual-booting <- Re: installing Cents os server 7.0
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015, 11:05 PM Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 9:21 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
> >
> > CentOS doesn't support dual boot, because I did all the work to
> > make that happen, the CentOS installer did nothing to help me make
> > this possible.
>
> If free space on a drive is
2010 Jun 25
1
Hardware RAID 10 server - reformat NTFS partition to ext3 and resize for Centos 5.5
Here's the situation. I have a dual boot machine - originally had Red
Hat and Windows 2000 Pro. The NTFS partition never did seem to 'get
along' with the Adaptec 2400A caching RAID controller. Linux always
seemed to like the I2O drivers. I went from RH Enterprise to now running
Centos 5.5. Works great! I really don't want the 200 gigs worth of NTFS.
Can't I just run
2018 Jun 08
5
Convert from LVM
I have a Centos 7 install using EXT4 on LVM. Its running as a VM
inside KVM. Issue I have run into is that fstrim does not work due to
the LVM. Without fstrim snapshots have gotten huge. Is there a way
convert it from LVM to non-LVM without a complete reinstall?
2018 May 28
9
CentOS6: HELP! EFI boot fails after replacing disks...
OK, I wanted to replace the 500G disks in a Dell T20 server with new 2TB
disks. The machine has 4 SATA ports, one used for the optical disk and three
for the hard drives. It is set up with /dev/sda and /dev/sdb with each three
partitions:
1 -- VFAT (for EFI)
2 -- ext4 (for /boot)
3 -- LVM
/dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 are a mirror raid (/dev/md0)
/dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb3 are a mirror raid
2015 Jul 05
2
USB stick query
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:43 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I've tried this again, and it does not seem to work.
>> Have you actually tried it?
> I don't have a CentOS system here that I can reboot readily. And it
> occurs to me that if I did, I didn't ask if your system boots via BIOS
> or UEFI.
Thanks for your response.
It boots via BIOS, and
2009 Mar 31
3
Installing Cent OS from a usb flash drive
I recently acquired a Fujitsu Lifebook 1610. Unfortunately, the
machine was missing a lot of the stuff that would've come with it brand
new, mainly the usb cdrom drive.
Currently, I'm running Fedora on it, and I installed it using a
usb flash drive with the help of a program called unetbootin(Probably
not spelled right). to load the ISO onto the USB drive. I've
successfully used
2015 Jun 25
6
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On Wed, June 24, 2015 16:11, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>
> Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration
> tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something
> I don't remember how to do regarding LVM, so I usually just
> don't bother with it at all.
>
> I believe it has some benefit for my use cases, but I've been
>
2016 Jan 03
2
CentOS-7.2 kernel panic
Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> My HP MicroServer crashes with a kernel panic
>> when booted into kernel-3.10.0-327.3.1.el7.x86_64,
>> but runs perfectly under kernel-3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 .
> AMD Turion64 cpu?
> Could be related to:
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9860
> uptream at
2020 Aug 02
5
8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto:
>> On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote:
>>> At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>>>> Hi Johnny,
>>>> thank you very much for clarification.
>>>>
>>>> You said that in the centos infrastructure only one server got the
>>>>
2011 Jul 06
3
When CentOS 6 arrives ...
What is the best way to install CentOS 6?
Is there an upgrade facility from CentOS-5.6?
If so, how does this compare with a clean installation?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
2010 Jan 22
3
Question about running a CentOS4.8 (32-bit) guest under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit)
I am trying to run my old CentOS4.8 (32-bit) system as a guest system
under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit). I followed the instructions in Appendix A
of the xen user manual (/usr/share/doc/xen-3.0.3/pdf/user.pdf) and
created a 'disk image' (actually a 10gig LVM logical volume:
sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo fdisk -l /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest
Disk /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest: 10.7 GB, 10737418240
2016 Feb 13
6
heads up: /boot space on kernel upgrade
On Sat, February 13, 2016 5:57 am, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Devin Reade wrote:
>
>> I have a CentOS 6 machine that was initially installed as CentOS 6.4
>> in May of 2013. It's /boot filesystem is 200M which, IIRC, was the
>> default /boot size at the time.
>
> As a matter of interest, is there any advantage today
> in having a /boot partition?
> I thought