similar to: kvm_intel: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module

I used the xensource install script for RHEL4 and after trying to boot on the new kernel the system just continually rebooted. I appended a noreboot to the xen line and now i''m seeing the following... Freeing unused kernel memory: 184k freed dm_mod: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. device-mapper: 4.4.0-ioctl (2005-01-12) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com

Quad core duo 2.4Ghz (Q6600) Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5PAE #1 SMP 4Gb RAM VirtualBox-1.5.6_28266_rhel5-1.i586.rpm The package installed OK. I did KERN_DIR=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.14.el5-i686 /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup and the module compiles AOK. BUT... at modprobe time: vboxdrv: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module Am I doing something stupid? -- rgds Stephen

Hello, I've tried over at IRC and it appears the solution to this problem may not be obvious. I'm working with a Centos7 box on HP ProLiant 380p hardware. The BIOS is a bit outdated, but both Intel Virtualization Options and VT-d are present and enabled in the firmware. Some relevant command outputs below: -bash-4.2$ dmesg | grep Virtualization [ 1.299295] DMAR: Intel(R)

Hi, I get this error when trying to insmod the ipp2p kernel module: "insmod: error inserting ''ipt_ipp2p.ko'': -1 Invalid module format" in the kernel log: "ipt_ipp2p: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" Kernel version 2.6.20.4 iptables version: 1.3.5 ipp2p version: 0.8.2 (latest) Anyone tried ipp2p with kernel 2.6.20? Best Regards Niclas

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 07:47:49AM -0600, Quincy Wofford wrote: > Hello, > > I've tried over at IRC and it appears the solution to this problem may not > be obvious. > > I'm working with a Centos7 box on HP ProLiant 380p hardware. The BIOS is a > bit outdated, but both Intel Virtualization Options and VT-d are present > and enabled in the firmware. > > Some

Thanks for all the replies. Looking at the specs for the processor it does not seem to have the vmx features in /proc/cpuinfo: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-2-Duo-T6400-Notebook-Processor.35100.0.html and the output from grep -E ?vmx|svm? /proc/cpuinfo is empty. /lib/modules/3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/arch/x86/kvm [keith.roberts at acer-centos kvm]$ ls kvm-amd.ko kvm-intel.ko

Hello, Some time ago, I noticed that whilst I had upgraded to Xen 3.1 (kernel 2.6.18-xen), I''d forgot to upgrade the paravirt DomU .cfg kernels from 2.6.16-xen to reflect this. So, I upgraded the DomU kernels & ran into issues with mounting devices, and the ext3 module not being available. After a bit of faffing about, I managed to sort this out and load the ext3 module.

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:51, Marcos Amorim <marcosmamorim at gmail.com> wrote: > > Warning: This message contains unverified links which may not be safe. You should only click links if you are sure they are from a trusted source. > Keith, > > Try modprobe > modprobe kvm > modprobe kvm_intel > > > Regards, > > > Marcos Amorim Thanks Marcos. I

All, These days I am trying to understand the interaction relationship between the libvirt and KVM kernel module, eg. kvm_intel.ko. We know that KVM kernel module expose an entry in form of device file "/dev/kvm" which can be accessed by user space application to control, for example, create a VM using KVM_CREATE_VM with help of ioctl. Now let's say the tool virsh based upon

in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 -- Eero 2015-04-16 21:02 GMT+03:00 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > well. this hack solution might work: > http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html > > -- > Eero > > 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at

Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > >> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to >> figure out what I need to do to get all the

2016-02-18 10:13 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:49:38AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >> performance is so bad it's killing me. >> >> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >> >> # lsmod

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

Hello, I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the performance is so bad it's killing me. I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo # lsmod |grep kvm kvm_intel 167936 6 kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? The disk format used is vmdk with no

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

2016-02-18 15:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:59:52PM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote: > >> 2016-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>: >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote: >>> >>> 2016-02-18 10:13 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

Hi all, I've started playing with kvm on CentOS 5.5, with not much success so far. In a nutshell, I have the same problem as http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2010-April/001854.html I followed the RHEL5 virtualization guide to set up a bridge interface br0, and then used virt-install (rather than virt-manager - I like automation) to set up the vm. It hangs at some point.