similar to: Two partitions with samd UUID??

On 6/14/2015 6:55 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Maybe I used dd at some point. > Would this keep the same UUID? DD just does a blind block by block copy between two devices or files. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

On 06/14/2015 10:08 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 08:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 6/14/2015 6:55 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> Maybe I used dd at some point. >>> Would this keep the same UUID? >> >> DD just does a blind block by block copy between two devices or files. >> >> >> > I thought that uuid had nothing to do

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, jd1008 wrote: > Thanx for the update > but what about non-gpt and non lvm partitions? > What is used as inp > nut to create a universally unique id? > > (Actually, for an id to be universally unique, one would almost > nee knowledge of all existing id's. > So, I do not have much credence in this universal uniqueness. Sufficiently random gets you

On 06/15/2015 11:08 AM, jd1008 wrote: > Thanx for the update > but what about non-gpt and non lvm partitions? > What is used as inp > nut to create a universally unique id? Non-GPT partitions do not have a UUID. The _content_ (filesystem, LVM physical volume, non-encrypted swap space, etc.) of such a partition could have a UUID, but the partition itself does not. -- Bob Nichols

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Always Learning wrote: > ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 > and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended partitions. > That suggests those partitions are not GPT but old fashioned M$DOS If it is old fashioned MSDOS, you can have four total primary and extended, not four primary plus extended. An extended

On 16 Jun 2015 12:12, "Always Learning" <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 11:30 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Always Learning wrote: > > > > > ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 > > > and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended partitions. >

On 06/16/2015 06:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 Jun 2015 12:12, "Always Learning" <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 11:30 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>>> ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems > ext3 >>>>

On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 21:41 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > Non-GPT partitions do not have a UUID. The _content_ (filesystem, > LVM physical volume, non-encrypted swap space, etc.) of such a > partition could have a UUID, but the partition itself does not. ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended

On 06/14/2015 08:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/14/2015 6:55 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Maybe I used dd at some point. >> Would this keep the same UUID? > > DD just does a blind block by block copy between two devices or files. > > > I thought that uuid had nothing to do with drive content, so dd would have (should have had) nothing to do with it. I thought it

On 06/15/2015 07:56 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 06/14/2015 10:08 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> >> >> On 06/14/2015 08:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 6/14/2015 6:55 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>> Maybe I used dd at some point. >>>> Would this keep the same UUID? >>> >>> DD just does a blind block by block copy between two devices

On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 11:30 +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Always Learning wrote: > > > ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 > > and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended partitions. > > That suggests those partitions are not GPT but old fashioned M$DOS > > If it is old fashioned MSDOS, you can

OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D Yes exist! ls -ld /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 root BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Jun 16 11:25 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol ----- ls -l /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol total 8 drwxrwx---+ 4 root BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Jun 14 2016 interno.MYDOMAIN.COM.BR ----- ls -l /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol/interno.MYDOMAIN.COM.BR/ total 16 drwxrwx---+ 28 root

Hello! samba -b | grep STATEDIR STATEDIR: /opt/samba/var/locks I commented at line idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes in my smb.conf, error is diferent now samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset open: error=2 (No such file or directory) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, 'Undetermined error') File "/opt/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",

Hi all, I am currently struggling to remove one of our Samba4 DC from the domain. Some time ago, adding a new Samba DC to our AD did not succeed and I had to demote the new server again. After removal, replication on one of the old/existing DCs got weird. /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool drs showrepl gives the following: Standardname-des-ersten-Standorts\dc02 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object

On 6/17/2016 12:32 PM, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Hello! > Yes path is correct, so that when you run the reset Sysol he saw > changing permissions of various files (as mentioned) after a time > (over 10 minutes) the error occurred. > > dc 1 and dc 2: > > /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf > > [sysvol] > path = /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > > >

With this we try to detect if the endianess switch works and assume LE if not. Suggested by Ben. Fixes: 51c05340e407 ("drm/nouveau/device: detect if changing endianness failed") --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 39 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c

Dear R and S People: I have run across something very strange. Here is a function that I wrote for R: boot1 <- function(y,method="f",p=1) { n1 <- length(y) n2 <- n1*p n3 <- n2 - 1 a <- 0.5*(outer(1:n3,1:n3,function(x,y){n2 - pmax(x,y)})) return(a) } and here is the R output: > y1 [1] 9 8 7 3 6 > source("boot1.R") > boot1(y=y1,p=4) [,1] [,2]

Hi all, I have just added a DC to our existing AD. Join did work without any error messages but now I have recognized that only inbound replication from old DCs is working outbound list is empty. Samba version is: Version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-cff0f8e here is the output of samba-tool drs showrepl: DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 94534f65-5d06-41f5-844d-a58a0bc03c93 DSA invocationId:

Fixes warnings on GPUs with smaller a smaller mmio region like vGPUs. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c index 8ebbe1656..17676c75a 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c +++

Fixes warnings on GPUs with smaller a smaller mmio region like vGPUs. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c index 8ebbe1656..17676c75a 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/base.c +++