similar to: C5 : Firefox 38 bug

On 06/13/2015 08:54 AM, jd1008 wrote: > > > The more you know, the less you trust :) :) > Read the article: > http://www.kaspersky.com/about/news/virus/2015/equation-group-the-crown-creator-of-cyber-espionage > > Got love a page that asserts dozens of alarming things with no examples, references or links to further reading, on top of that my understanding is that the

On 6/13/2015 12:15 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> > Got love a page that asserts dozens of alarming things with no > examples, references or links to further reading, on top of that my > understanding is that the principals of this domain are (ex) KGB > agents. Incendiary writing designed to create fear and angst. standard operating procedures in the (in)Security business. --

On Fri, June 12, 2015 4:16 pm, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: >>> >>> On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>>>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>>>> But the

On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing >>>> somebody's else code on your computer. >>> >>> your

On 06/12/2015 03:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>>> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing >>>>>

On Sun, June 14, 2015 8:03 am, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Sat, June 13, 2015 17:56, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> >> As I said about these services here (KGB, CIA, MI-6, ...) there >> is no "ex" for their agents. The only way one retired from these >> organizations is dead, feet first dead. >> > > A bit hyperbolic. One could with as much

On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing >> somebody's else code on your computer. > > > your computer is *ALWAYS* executing someone elses code, unless you wrote > every line of code in it, including the BIOS and the firmware of all the >

On Sat, June 13, 2015 17:56, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > As I said about these services here (KGB, CIA, MI-6, ...) there > is no "ex" for their agents. The only way one retired from these > organizations is dead, feet first dead. > A bit hyperbolic. One could with as much justification state that there is no such thing as an ex-marine, an ex-seal, an ex-commissioned

According to the mongrel_cluster.yml file you provided, you''re starting only 14 mongrels, but in your proxy balancer config you have 30 mongrels listed on ports 21000 - 21029. In this scenario, if apache tries to proxy to any ports higher than 21014 then you''ll get a proxy error as a mongrel doesn''t exist on that port. Or am I missing something? -----Original

Hi, I have a question about computing shortest Euclidean distances between two data frames of spatial points... I have 2 dataframes (not yet converted to spatial class) >Sewers<-data.frame(x=c(10,20,35,50),y=c(100,150,200,300)) >transect <- data.frame(x=seq(from=0, to=50, by=1),y=seq(from=100, to=150, by=1)) I would like to be able to compute the shortest distance from the

Well them plus CIA, NSA, Barney the Dinosaur and Teletubbies. Brian Bernard On Apr 2, 2015 5:58 PM, "????????? ????????" <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote: > One thing I forgot to mention: I also always recommend AGAINST using >> kasperski. Kasperski is KGB guy (*cough* *cough* retired. You know in that >> service retirement is only feet first dead, so you do your

You have issues? DICK HAS SOLUTIONS. <http://bethesday.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVRV09RVlYdU1wDX1cNVg> <http://bethesday.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVRUE9RVlYdU1wDX1cNVg> <http://bethesday.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVRUU9RVlYdU1wDX1cNVg> <http://bethesday.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgFAQVRUk9RVlYdU1wDX1cNVg> frankly, a little more important than the comedic series of firings is

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > Now get rid of pre-2.6 Python support ;-) Not only it helps clean-up code, > by 2-and-3 coexistence is much easier. > > It looks like Daniel was able to add py3k support fairly cleanly. I'm not sure how much of a difference removing pre-2.6 support would make at this point. (also, let's

> One thing I forgot to mention: I also always recommend AGAINST using > kasperski. Kasperski is KGB guy (*cough* *cough* retired. You know in > that > service retirement is only feet first dead, so you do your math). Is KGB rant still in vogue in your new homeland?

ok, correct me where I'm wrong: - the <sources> tag defines max ices processes can feed icecast - several ices sources are sent to the same icecast process, but on different ports - the icecast process is configured with <relay> <server>127.0.0.1</server> ..... </relay> for each ices instance ? or with mount ? thanks, petre On 29 Sep 2005

hello I have the following problem: is it possible to have several ices "feed" mp3 files to only one icecast process ? or do I have to make pais - ices/icecast - in order to have several streams on my machine ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac - petre@kgb.ro

hallo I want to reencode mp3's to a 128 kbps rate, in order to avoid "on-the-fly encoding" feature what program I need ? is switching format from mp3 to ogg a good option ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac Network Scientist - petre at kgb.ro

On Thu, April 2, 2015 4:27 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, April 2, 2015 4:11 pm, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's >> laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's >> the current best

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251&tid=158&tid=95&tid=103 Probably some of you already saw this. Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's the technical aspect. Suppose i provide VoIP services using Asterisk, and i fall under the incidence of the FCC ruling

Hi guys, We have found a bug of BitcodeReader.cpp in processing an LTO bitcode file. As LLVM doesn't emit use-list for LTO bitcode files, many forward references will happen when BitcodeReader processes the bitcode file, and LLVM uses placeholders for those forward references and resolve them later. When parseConstants() reads in a CST_CODE_CE_SELECT record, e.g. select