similar to: Need .repo file for http://dev.centos.org/centos/6

The *CentOS-Fasttrack *paragraph of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories links to http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo which returns a 404. https://web.archive.org/web/20141011004000/http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo is a copy captured on Oct 11, 2014, which indicates CentOS-6 Fasttrack was around at that time.

Maybe I posted this a little late on Friday for anyone to take an interest in suggesting a properly built search URL for the current forum software, so I did some experiments which led to the suggestion added below the copy of the previous post. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:52 PM, I wrote: > [ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum

I did the last major rewrite of the AdditionalRepos page, in large part because of issues we see repeatedly on the IRC channels. The repos placed in the "known problem" section are there for a good reason -- they replace base packages by default, or they're poorly maintained, leading to security issues. Or both. Atomic falls squarely into the former category -- it replaces key parts

Does anyone know what are all the centos 6 reppos? I have: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-fasttrack.repo CentOS-Media.repo CentOS-Vault.repo devtools.repo epel.repo epel-testing.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo Am I missing a repo I am not aware of?

On 22/10/17 04:41, Dustin McNabb wrote: > as Johnny pointed out All that Johnny pointed out was that 6 is a link to 6.9 and should therefore have the same content. He never said anything about os having the latest release of the package, he simply said that 6 should (and it does, in updates). > this package was > released August 31st and should be in the os repo by now, 6.9 (which 6

[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, On the page http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show ... CentOS-6 Fasttrack is now available and can be accessed with the repo configuration here<http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo> . But link is died: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo Anyone could help me to found this file please ? Thanks,

I'm looking for guidance here. Selecting [http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/packages/atomic-release/ atomic-release] returns a 404. In fact, http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/packages/ comes back as 404 also. It seems to an inexperienced me, that https://www.atomicorp.com/downloads.html under the anchor <a title="Atomicorp Free RPMS repository"

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:53:11PM +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, jd1008 wrote: > > >One of the enabled repos is centos-media.repo > >It fails: > > If you have the DVD repo enabled, and don't provide it with the DVD, it will > fail. I'd disable that repo, as it suggests, and just use the network repos. > In case it isn't clear,

Did you see this list? http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories There are also repos for Adobe (Flash, Reader, et al), Google (Chrome, Earth, et al), and it seems like there used to be one for Oracle's JDK, too. On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone know what are all the centos 6 reppos? > I have: > >

On Fri, October 20, 2017 5:24 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/20/2017 05:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/20/2017 12:53 PM, Dustin McNabb wrote: >>> The patch for CESA-2017:2563 announced at >>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2017-August/022529.html >>> is only available in the centos 6.9 repo. It is missing for the generic >>>

On 10/20/2017 12:53 PM, Dustin McNabb wrote: > The patch for CESA-2017:2563 announced at > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2017-August/022529.html > is only available in the centos 6.9 repo. It is missing for the generic > centos-6 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/os/x86_64/Packages/. > Typically this repo contains all the latest patches for the latest

Thanks for the quick and helpful replies. Also, thank you for pointing out that I should have been looking in updates, not os. That makes perfect sense, but I got hung up on the fact that it was missing from os. Anyway, that led to me discovering that on one of my internal mirrors the updates repo hadn?t synced in a couple months, which was ultimately the cause for the missing package in that

The patch for CESA-2017:2563 announced at https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2017-August/022529.html is only available in the centos 6.9 repo. It is missing for the generic centos-6 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/os/x86_64/Packages/. Typically this repo contains all the latest patches for the latest minor release, but it's missing the new version of openssh. I

On 10/20/2017 05:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/20/2017 12:53 PM, Dustin McNabb wrote: >> The patch for CESA-2017:2563 announced at >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2017-August/022529.html >> is only available in the centos 6.9 repo. It is missing for the generic >> centos-6 repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/os/x86_64/Packages/.

Hi All, smplayer has no mailing list. I tried to register at http://forum.smplayer.info/ucp.php?mode=register but the capchas are so incredibly impossible to discern that I gave up after 5 tries. I tried the audio option, but the audio option plays so garbled it is impossible to understand. My audio is great. I play youtube vids with great clarity. So I am hoping someone who is on that forum to

Hi all Does anyone know what causes this error? I have setup a local CentOS repository, with mrepo, and can succesfully use it for updates & installation of just about anything. Yet, this error comes up. Here's my /etc/yum.conf: # PUT YOUR REPOS HERE OR IN separate files named file.repo # in /etc/yum.repos.d [base-local] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base #mirrorlist=

Hi, The dahdi-firmware package seems to be missing in the asterisk-current repo on http://packages.asterisk.org --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: dahdi-linux-2.6.2-1_centos6.x86_64 (asterisk-current) Requires: dahdi-firmware Can this please be fixed. Thanks, Patrick

All, There have been many people asking for how to do installs now that CentOS-4 has moved past End Of Life. First, I want to tell you that it is VERY dangerous to use CentOS-4 now. There is at least 1 critical (ie, remotely exploitable root) issue on CentOS 4 already: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-1182 The number of unpatched critical issues will grow. Using CentOS-4 is

On 05/16/2016 11:19 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2016 23:05:37 -0600 > jd1008 wrote: > >> I am having a terrible time installing multi media tools >> like smplayer (which requires mplayer), which is not avaiable >> from the centos repos. >> I have installed epel.repo which containa the epel-release repo info >> for yum > Have you also installed