similar to: NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Aan: "CentOS

Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be > wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude >> laptops, with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop, >> it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless. >> When clicking the nm icon

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Donderdag 11 juni 2015 19:59:39 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk

On 11 Jun 2015 13:28, <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> wrote: > > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be> > Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58 > Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs

On 08/03/17 10:15, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their >> network >> "managed" by Networkmanager. > > You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy > scripts that you're advised to avoid using unless necessary, or

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 16:36:40 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be > wrote: >> Hello All,

I tried to boot a Centos 8.2 install CD, one burned with Centos-8-2-2004-x86_64-boot . In the setup, it persisted in telling me that ethernet thing enp0s25 was disconnected. Nyet. 'Twas working several seconds previous and is working now. This is a showstopper. How do I debug it? Also, whatever else it did, I now have environment variable

On 03/08/2017 07:39 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Yes it is really hard! >> >> ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25 >> ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > This is still a deliberately trivial

On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > > Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I only have ifcfg-lo , which I am pretty sure is the loopback interface. > As expected, other files suggest eth0 is my ethernet connection. > Should I add a one-line ifcfg-eth0 file? If you are using ethernet (and not a wireless device or some other internet connectivity) you should have an ifcfg- file for the interface.

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > Hello All, > > on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops, with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop, > it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless. > When clicking the nm icon in the top right corner, I'm not seeing access

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> I only have ifcfg-lo , which I am pretty sure is the loopback interface. >> As expected, other files suggest eth0 is my ethernet connection. >> Should I add a one-line ifcfg-eth0 file? > > If you are using ethernet (and not a wireless device or some other

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:03:10PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I'm using the default I got when I installed centos 7. > Was not aware of any alternatives. > > > ... Run 'nmcli con' to get a list of your network > > [root at localhost ~]# nmcli con > NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE > Wired connection 1

This document from Qualcomm may help. http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/qualcomm-dash-licensing-commitment it states : Companies will not have to pay royalties or license fees because they have implemented the DASH Standard using Qualcomm's DASH Essential Patents within a standalone software application sold and distributed separately from a product capable of implementing a WWAN

Hi all, I'm observing an issue that as soon as libvirt starts, UPD broadcasts going through physical network (and unrelated to any virtualization) get broken. Specifically, windows neighbourhood browsing through samba's nmbd starts suffering badly (Samba is running on this same box). At the moment I'm running a quite outdated version 1.2.9 of libvirt, but other than this issue,

Hello All, slightly unrelated because lightdm = epel, I know. Still, maybe someone had the same issue. When using the last two kernels, some machines give me trouble when installing Centos7 and Mate One machine is basically an Asrock board, on this I get no login screen: description: Motherboard product: AD2550B-ITX vendor: ASRock *-display description: VGA compatible

Hello, I've been using samba for a few years but I use it only occasionally. Today, I've found out that since the upgrade to 4.9.2, smbd wouldn't start. I use Arch Linux. The command that starts samba on the systemd service is this: /usr/bin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group These are my configuration file's [global] parameters: bind interfaces only = Yes domain master =

Roland hi there I believe you are right. Yes I'm sure something not configured correctly? The old smb.conf below... Untitled Document Many thanx Best regards Ashley On 2019/02/15 11:30, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:50:13 +0200 > Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> Ah, 'classicupgrade' ???? >>>

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 > route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 > echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf > echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's entirely your choice. What you end up with if you take this approach

On 03/08/2017 05:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> Not really, Redhat/Centos has a lot to offer, but for me, networking is a >> one-time configuration, and the best way to configure it is using something >> that falls within this principle: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle >> >> I'm not