similar to: less for CentOS6 with POSIX regex?

On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, tony at softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote: > In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, > Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: >> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that >> "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using >> since almost forever.

On 06/09/2015 12:48 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, tony at softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote: >> In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, >> Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: >>> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that >>> "less" no longer understood \<

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was

I have two CentOS6 boxes, both running Bind as a local resolver, with what appears to me to be the same configuration as each other. I have a problem on one but not the other, to do with DNSSEC Lookaside Validation. On the box with the problem, if I do: host www.bbc.co.uk 127.0.0.1 (for example), it sits there for a while, then gives me a timeout error. I did some tests while running a tcpdump

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

In article <5c2439dc6351659900b0c7ef421ae3f1e7b84fe4.camel at biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? > > > > The

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3g at mail.gmail.com>, Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to mirror the centos.org repository for an offline network. I > don't need the ISO images, don't need any i386 stuff, and I think I > probably don't need any of the source code rpms either.

I have an instance of VMware server 1.0.10 hosted on CentOS 5, and it runs fine, with guests of CentOS 4, CentOS5 or Win2000. I have just created a new VM and installed CentOS6 on it, which also runs fine, except that I can't build the VMware tools on it. I get compilation errors when compiling the kernel modules, due to changes in the definition of struct net_device among other things. I

I have the two DVD isos for CentOS 6.5 mounted as loopback, on the mount points /centos6 and /centos6a, and am trying to use them for PXE/KS installation. The problem I have is that the packages in /centos6a/Packages are not found by the installer. The host is a CentOS 5 system. Is there a way for me to overlay the second DVD on the first without having to copy all the packages from both isos

In article <CAOZy0enqddiPvpd+M-Ltwih9dPmA7b_ro4-_5bQ=u1GAALDebA at mail.gmail.com>, Tim Dunphy <bluethundr at gmail.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > Sorry for the failed attempts at obscuring the company I work for. My boss > wouldn't take too kindly to it if I revealed that information on a mailing > list. :) It's easily deducible from the IP addresses anyway...

Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come across this issue. I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this package was updated in the last week from 0.9.2-1.el6 to 0.9.3-1.el6. On all these systems, I received an error from logrotate this morning. It appears that

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis