similar to: Strange network failure on C6

We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=192.168.255.255 DEVICE=eth1:192 IPADDR=192.168.0.1 IPV6INIT=no MTU="" NAME="LAN - Non-routable" NETMASK=255.255.0.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0

CentOS-5 $ ll /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/* total 0 $ ll /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices total 0 CentOS-6 $ ll /sysconfig/networking/profiles total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 15:19 default $ ll /sysconfig/networking/profiles/* total 24 -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 158 Oct 7 15:19 hosts -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 116 Oct 7 15:19 ifcfg-br0 -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 238 Oct 7 15:24

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

Hi all! I'm running C6 (up to date) on x86-64. have been running on the same system for over a year. a couple of times lately access to the outside network has suddenly stopped working for reasons that I didn't figure out until it happened again yesterday. I had the time to fool with it, yesterday, so after quite a bit of head-banging I found that it had no default route set up (to make

On Wed, February 18, 2015 13:07, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> 2. How does one configure the routing table on network startup to >> specifically detail the route particular addresses are supposed to >> take? >> > > Not exactly sure how routing works with aliases on the same

What is the correct combination of packages to configure and manage VMs via virt-manager undet CentOS-5.4? If I use qemu then while virt-manager works I obtain SELinux alerts with respect to the real-time clock. If instead of qemu I use kvm-qemu-img then virt-manager simply does not work. It starts but it does not find any form of qemu and the selection boxes are all greyed out. Further, do I

I have a server located remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this:

On Thu, February 19, 2015 12:33, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >>> I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: >>> >>> ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 >>> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 >>> GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 >>> >> >> Which should have been:

I did a yum update to my desktop machine as root this morning and now my regular logon account sees this whenever I press the enter key: etc/audisp/audispd.conf: Permission denied etc/audisp/plugins.d/af_unix.conf: Permission denied etc/audisp/plugins.d/syslog.conf: Permission denied etc/audit/audit.rules: Permission denied etc/audit/auditd.conf: Permission deniedetc/dhcp/dhclient.d/ntp.sh:

given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network (for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO networkmanager installed contents of resolv.conf search some.domain.here nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1 nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2 change resolv.conf to: search some.newdomain.here nameserver

In the Redhat EL6 virtualization guide ( http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/sect-Virtualization-Network_Configuration-Bridged_networking_with_libvirt.html ) I read this: # Configure iptables Configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge. # iptables -I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT # service iptables

I have a test system that I am using to investigate CentOS-7. I note the following difficulty when booting from the Minimal Install DVD. Neither on the initial install nor on subsequent attempts at re-installing CentOS-7 can I set the IPv4 interface to a static IP address. I can configure it but I cannot save the changes. The save button remains greyed out. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

Received these error message during update 16Jun2020. Running scriptlet: kmod-kvdo-6.2.1.138-58.el8_1.x86_64 750/1181 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 21: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 22: syntax error: unexpected end of file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 21: unexpected EOF while looking

I''ve been using Puppet now for a month or so and I''ve come to a problem that may warrant an additional Puppet metaparameter. I''m advocating the addition of a metaparameter called "preaction" (or something like that), which will perform some arbitrary action before the resource is modified. There may be a way to do this within Puppet already (with some

Where on the CentOS website does one find the CentOS-6 CR repo install package? I can find the one for CentOS-5 but not for 6. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

CentOS-6.10 We have a host with the following ifcfg file contents: BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST="" DEFROUTE=yes DEVICE=eth1 . . . GATEWAY=X.Y.Z.234 IPADDR=A.B.C.2 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME="LAN Link - eth1" NETMASK="255.255.255.128" NETWORK="A.B.C.0" NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=25 TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no And an aliased ifcfg containing this:

Hi all, I use CentOS5.x + Xen in production for virtualization. I use it with bridged vlan networks and bonding (active-backup) like that: eth0 eth1 | | ------- | bond0-------bond0.10---------bond0.12 ... | | | | vlanbr10 vlanbr12 dom0 | | ------------- -------------- | |

I am trying to set up a test kvm virtual machine on a core2 quad system. I have managed to thread my way through bridging eth0 and I have a CentOS-5.4 dvd iso prepared. Using virt-manager, when I try and add a new guest then I get the error reproduced below. Now, I know that I can 'fix' this by building a local mod via audit2allow and installing via semodule. However, I cannot seem to

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN