similar to: Back to eth shuffling ...

When I was working on this last time (with the r8169 driver), someone on this list provided the following script which is what "fixed" the issue at the time by creating a new 70-persistent-net.rules file with the devices enumerated in order. However, this no longer works now. echo "[KICKSTART] Binding eth interfaces to the expected MAC address in UDEV" echo "## Created by

Actually, I know what the MAC is for the builtin Port1 and 2. Those are listed in the BIOS. But ultimately I don't want to rely on them as I want the same kickstart file to work for other machines, so hardcoding those in the kickstart file wouldn't quite work, unless I start writing multiple kickstart files, one per machine. Anyway, lspci reports this: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel

Right, I understand that part. However I believe I'm now in the realm of making this specific to this machine as I have no guarantee that another identical machine will pop up with those same bus IDs. Maybe for the internal ports, but I don't know if the same will happen for the PCIe bus. Would that be correct? On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Kahlil Hodgson < kahlil.hodgson at

So a 70-persistent-net.rules like # onboard port 1 -> eth0 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:00:19.0", NAME="eth0" # PCIe card -> eth2 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:03:00.0", NAME="eth2" # onboard port 2 -> eth1 ACTION=="add",

another identical machine will have the same bus ids. that's why this works. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd GitHub: @tartansandal Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must

On 15 May 2015 at 03:51, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > After the machine boots and I look in /root/ksnet-devices, I see the MAC > addresses for the devices as: > Port1 -> eth0 > PCIe Card-> eth1 > Port2 -> eth2 > > And yet, during the machine's POST (which can verify by the PXE boot up of > each device), it correctly enumerates the

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

Here is my script for post install if you want to try it. In order for the shuffling to not occur you do need to create the udev rules file somehow. I am not sure how mangled this will be in email but it is worth a try. It should run OK with nothing else. I have a better version in the works but the enhancements are mainly useful for Fedora 19-21. I did forget to say I also block

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

Hi, I want to use this qemu command '-object memory-backend-file,id=mem,size=2048M,mem-path=/mnt/huge,share=on' with libvirt but i can't find the 'mem-path' and 'share' in the documentation. because the vhost-user backend based on 'share=on' parameter and libvirt support vhostuser i guess there maybe another way to support this parameter? this is my xml:

Hello, Sorry, I know the topic has been talked about already but I searched the archives and I'm still unsure of the proper way to have dovecot (imap-login) listen to several addresses and/or several ports. 1. how do I translate dovecot-1 protocol imap { listen = xx.xx.xx.xx:143 yy.yy.yy.yy:143 ssl_listen = xx.xx.xx.xx:993 yy.yy.yy.yy:939 } I started by service imap-login {

Define out of order in this case just so I know for sure what you mean. What my solution does, or at least does reliably in my case, is make sure the interfaces are in the same order once installed as the install kernel saw them. It won't re-order them to be sequential based on bus, mac or driver. I am working on that but it will also include naming the devices based on the module

I hope someone can enlighten me. I have a quad-port Intel 82580 nic (igb driver) on my system and I''d like to dedicate each nic to a HVM via VT-d PCI passthrough. The IOMMU on my system seems to work, I can assign the PCI devices to my HVMs. The HVMs see the pci device and load their respective igb drivers, and ethtool -i eth0 works on each HVM, shows the drivers are loaded and the

Starting back in RHEL/Cent 5 I found that the only way to make sure your interface enumeration was consistent after install with what you had during install was to create a udev rules file using the mac addresses as the key. It is easy to run a short script in postinstall to create it based on how anaconda has seen them. In order for this to work on Cent 6 you have to set biosdevname=0

On 2014/10/8 16:57, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:03:47AM +0800, Linhaifeng wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to use this qemu command '-object memory-backend-file,id=mem,size=2048M,mem-path=/mnt/huge,share=on' with libvirt but i can't find the 'mem-path' and 'share' in the documentation. >> because the vhost-user backend

I want to capture all my Asterisk traffic (including RTP) and then analyse it. My plan was to use tcpdump and then analyse with Wireshark. The following works: tcpdump -i eth0 -s 0 -w /tmp/tcpdump.1 But I want to be a bit more selective: tcpdump -C 100 -W 10 -w /tmp/tcpdump -i eth1 -s 0 udp and dst port >= 5060 This doesn't capture the RTP traffic. Could anyone advise what I'm

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When