similar to: openvpn and firewalld

I am trying to build a new openvpn server based on CentOS7. Everything is working fine as long as I disable firewalld. With firewalld enabled, I can connect to the vpn and ping the machines on the network, but I am unable to ssh to them. What I had on my old server with iptables was two simple rules: -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s <localnet>/255.255.0.0 -d <vpnnet>/255.255.0.0 -j

How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: iptables -I FORWARD 3 -i tun+ -j ACCEPT This rule was extracted from my iptables

On Mon, November 16, 2015 16:39, Nick Bright wrote: > On 11/6/2015 3:58 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> I have a couple of relevant articles you may be interested in ... >> >> On assigning the zone via NM: >> https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/8 >> >> Look down to the "Specifying a particular firewall zone" bit ... >> remember that if you edit the

On Mon, March 27, 2017 17:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Mike wrote: >> Nice catch, Mr. Schumacher ---> The following modules are included >> as >> standard with release 1.831 of Webmin. FirewallD firewalld.wbm.gz >> Configure a Linux firewall using FirewallD, by editing allowed >> services and ports. >> >> This is likely the right tool for the

An intermittent need to connect to a CentOS4 development box from a MS-Win2K workstation using X-Windows has developed here. However, I cannot seem to find a cheap (read free) X-windows client for MS- Windows to accommodate this. This seems very odd to me, displaying no doubt my profound ignorance of the issues involved. The few shareware versions that I have located expect registration

On Thu, May 26, 2016 10:51, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 26/05/2016 a las 11:39 a.m., Valeri Galtsev escribi?: >> I guess, it is just me in general unhappy about all Linuxes >> getting much less "UNIX"y lately. > > I feel you Valerei, im switching new server instalations to FreeBSD. > Im tired to spend useful time learning new ways (systemd, firewalld, > dnf,

CentOS-6 When I login as root I see this prompt: [root at vhost04 ~]# When I login as a non-priviledged user I see this instead: sh-4.1$ .bashrc and .bash_profile have identical contents in /root and /home/user. What causes the difference? Why? How does one change the default so that all normal users get a [userid at hostname pwd]$ prompt? I have loked in/etc/profile.d and /etc/bashrc

I am experiencing a problem with yum on one of my CentOS-5.5 systems. Specifically, on Friday past (July 16), I ran yum update as root. Yum displayed all of the outdated packages and asked if I wanted to proceed. An answered yes. This first package downloaded was nss. At this point yum simply stopped processing or responding. A ctrl-c at the yum session terminal window did not interrupt the

On Mon, March 9, 2015 13:11, John Plemons wrote: > Been working on fail2ban, and trying to make it work with plain Jane > install of Centos 7 > > Machine is a HP running 2 Quad core Xeons, 16 gig or ram and 1 plus TB > of disk space. Very generic and vanilla. > > Current available epel repo version is fail2ban-0.9.1 > > Looking at the log file, fail2ban starts and stops

I have two hosts which have their respective keys loaded into each others .ssh/authorized-keys2 file for root. I want to move a directory tree from one host to the other via rsync to maintain a shadow structure of the application provided on the main host. This is the relevant part of the command: rsync -avz --rsh=ssh --delete-after /var/data/pas-redmine root at

Le 29/12/2017 ? 10:32, Kenneth Porter a ?crit?: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying > to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the > office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an > ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: >

W dniu 29.12.2017 o?10:32, Kenneth Porter pisze: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying > to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the > office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an > ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: >

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying to > get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the office. I've > got it all working but only by manually inserting an ACCEPT rule in

Hi Earl, >The problem is you added the rule in runtime and when you reloaded it >removed the rule that you added; therefore you need to use --permanent >or >do not reload. Thanks! That worked. [root at appd:~] #firewall-cmd --zone=home --list-ports [root at appd:~] #firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-port=8181/tcp --permanent success [root at appd:~] #firewall-cmd --reload success [root

> On 10 Mar 2015, at 14:30, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > > On Mon, March 9, 2015 13:11, John Plemons wrote: >> Been working on fail2ban, and trying to make it work with plain Jane >> install of Centos 7 >> >> Machine is a HP running 2 Quad core Xeons, 16 gig or ram and 1 plus TB >> of disk space. Very generic and vanilla.

On 12/29/2017 3:59 AM, Wojciech ?ysiak wrote: > firstly check which zone are your interface in : > > bash> firewall-cmd --get-active-zones > > then all you have to do is add a service to the firewall > > firewall-cmd --zone=<INSERT YOUR ZONE> --add-service=openvpn --permanent > > assuming that your Openvpn is running on standard port 1194/tcp|udp, > If not

> I tried adding the tun0 interface to the internal zone and firewall- > cmd?told me tun0 was managed by NetworkManager. After that it didn't > show?tun0 as a member of any zone. > #? firewall-cmd --zone=internal --add-interface=tun0 > The interface is under control of NetworkManager, setting zone to? > 'internal'. success > # firewall-cmd --list-all-zones >

On 7/27/2018 11:50 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Jul 27, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at BUC.com> wrote: >> I have a CentOS 7 server that is running out of memory > How do you know that? Give a specific symptom. This was brought to my attention because one program was killed by the kernel to free memory and another program failed because it was unable to allocate

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

On Thursday 21 of April 2016 2:37:49 PM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/21/2016 01:33 PM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > > It's OpenVPN on chamber. > What port is it using? I don't see the standard port listed in your > firewalld rules in either zone. 1194/udp. I added service openvpn and port 1194/udp (just to be sure) to both zones - no change. [root at chamber openvpn]#