similar to: website suggestions

On 12/03/2015 04:26 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 11:39 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>>> version, but,

Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release > itself. And while you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part

On 03/12/15 10:39, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is

On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > >> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and internally >> CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an issue? > > Yes. It confuses humans. There have been a bunch of examples given of > how it confuses

Am 03.12.2015 um 11:39 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>>

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: > >>> > >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > > > Note that I was asking about the release

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:42 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> > wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl

Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent > version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure > out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me. CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ... > https://wiki.centos.org/Download appears to say that

On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: >> >>> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and >>> internally CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > > > I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent > > > version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure

On 04/14/2015 01:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/13/2015 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 04/12/2015 10:29 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>> On 04/13/2015 11:42 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:25 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 06:33:27AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>>

On 04/13/2015 11:17 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 04/14/2015 01:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 04/13/2015 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 04/12/2015 10:29 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>>> On 04/13/2015 11:42 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:25 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at

On 03/12/15 13:58, Greg Bailey wrote: > Those who care about the upstream version knew that this was derived > from RHEL 7.0. Those who don't care about upstream versions but want to > track monthly rebuilds of cloud images, etc., could distinguish between > "1406" and (for example) "1407". But somewhere along the line for 7.1, > the "component that

On 12/03/2015 12:53 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>> >>>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? >> >> Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release >> itself. And

On 12/07/2015 05:46 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > wrote: > >> On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> >>> IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large >>> enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. >>> >> >> Does google

On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me. > > > CentOS 7.1511 (aka

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me.

On 04/12/2015 10:29 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 04/13/2015 11:42 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:25 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 06:33:27AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> What may be happening is that you may need to be on the console and >>>> accept the license on the first reboot after the

Sorry, I didn't read what you said carefully enough -- it's trying to create a system group. Still, looking inside of /etc/group to see what system groups already exist is probably a good idea. On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 02:19:51PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > The groupadd manpage gives this clue: > > The default is to use the smallest ID value greater than or equal to >