Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "CENTOS not DoD approved"
2015 Apr 28
1
CENTOS not DoD approved
On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote:
> nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
> the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary
hoops. Do you wish to pay for this?
skimming the requirements, it also requires extensive documentation of
said 'Product'. Do you wish to write this?
2015 Apr 28
3
CENTOS not DoD approved
On 04/28/2015 02:30 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote:
>> nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on
>> the APL, only RedHat and SuSE
>
>
> DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary
> hoops. Do you wish to pay for this?
>
> skimming the requirements, it also requires
2015 Apr 29
1
CENTOS not DoD approved
On 04/28/2015 06:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>
>> CentOS is not approved for DOD use. In fact, CentOS is not now, nor has
>> it ever been *certified* for anything. Certifications require people to
>> PAY to certify a product.
>>
>> Specifically, EAL4 Certification, a requirement
2015 Apr 28
0
CENTOS not DoD approved
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
> CentOS is not approved for DOD use. In fact, CentOS is not now, nor has
> it ever been *certified* for anything. Certifications require people to
> PAY to certify a product.
>
> Specifically, EAL4 Certification, a requirement for the DOD, costs up to
> 2.5 million dollars .. see this link:
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
> sites with New DoDCAC
>
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant.
>
2014 Dec 04
2
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be
certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
> will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
> systems as well.
That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be
used. He would make a determination whether it's supportable and
maintainable, based on in-house
2014 Dec 03
5
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
web sites.
I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the
buildings I work in upgraded their security system. My old CAC was
working fine prior to this for signing and encrypting email and for
authenticating to various DoD (.mil) sites
2024 May 16
1
[Non-DoD Source] Re: R for the US Air Force
You described it well; I?m afraid that?s what it is. They want documents of an organization that doesn?t fit the description, and only then will they test it.
That sounds great. I?ll reach out to Jeremy and see if he can help me get the IDs the USAF wants. It sounds like Joshua predates my time here. That?s a really good idea.
Thanks very much!
Doug
From: Josiah Parry
2014 Dec 04
0
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Ricles
>> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
2014 Dec 04
0
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems as well.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
>> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
>> that. So you mean if
2002 Dec 09
2
APL?
Hi,
is anybody out there who knows APL and would help me to translate 52
lines of APL code into propper R?
best,
Torsten
2014 Dec 04
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> >> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> >> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> >> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> >> > web
2011 Jun 14
1
Sound works in other source engine games but not DOD:S
I can play HL2 and others OOTB with sound. With DOD:S I have tried every combination of audio options in winecfg and also disabled pulseaudio to no avail.
I can't seem to find the same issue reported that wasn't easily fixed with the above steps.
"Linux Mint 11 64" 2.6.38-8-generic
Wine 1.3.21 (from Ubuntu Natty PPA)
Games are steam versions.
I have no idea where to go from
2014 Dec 04
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> > web sites.
> >
> > I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the
> > buildings I work in upgraded
2014 Dec 04
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote:
> Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> web sites.
>
> I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when
2014 Dec 03
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
> To: CentOS List
> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites
> with New DoD CAC
>
> Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> CentOS 6.6? I
2008 Dec 13
0
Steam/DOD/CS Issue
I recently installed Wine 1.1.10 on Arch Linux and got Steam up and running. I then installed CounterStrike and Day of Defeat and played them without any issues. I went to play them today and they kept crashing. Here is the output from terminal.
Code:
env WINEPREFIX="/home/user/.wine" wine "C:\Program Files\Steam\steam.exe" -applaunch 300 -opengl
2004 Mar 31
11
Zero Index Origin?
I'm very new to R and utterly blown away by not only the
language but the unbelievable set of packages and the
documentation and the documentation standards and...
I was an early APL user and never lost my love for it and in
R I find most of the essential things I loved about APL
except for one thing. At this early stage of my learning I
can't yet determine if there is a way to