Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "CentOS 6.6 x86_64, rpm error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# ..."
2015 Apr 28
0
CentOS 6.6 x86_64, rpm error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# ...
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:37 AM, <carlh04426 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I had some health issues for a few months and I barely recall dealing
> with Heartbleed ... it's all just a blur. Now I'm getting back up to
> speed, but I have a pair of CentOS 6.6 x86_64 + Virtualmin 4.13 GPL
> servers which no longer seem to be picking up available updates.
2011 Dec 23
2
yum --import of RPMforge
Using the instructions on:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge#head-f0
c3ecee3dbb407e4eed79a56ec0ae92d1398e01
I enter the command: rpm --import http://apt.sw.be/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
and it comes back to the prompt, like it worked, but attempting to
confirm the download:
rpm -K rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.*.rpm
results in:
error:
2015 Apr 28
1
[SOLVED] Re: CentOS 6.6 x86_64, rpm error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# ...
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:47:32 +0530
Ashish Yadav wrote:
> have you tried to rebuild the RPM database using below command,
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ashish, and thank you for your reply. I contemplated doing that but
felt I needed to better understand the problem, first. As it happens, I
refined my search phrase a few more times and ultimately discovered the
problem ... and the fix:
2011 Oct 03
1
hdr SHA1: BAD, not hex
Got a problem with one workstation. What I'm seeing, from a yum update
(saw it with make whatis first):
<snip>
Running rpm_check_debug
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 1211 hdr SHA1: BAD, not hex
<repeated many times>
<snip>
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
libicui18n.so.36 is needed by boost-1.33.1-10.el5_7.3.i386
libicuuc.so.36 is needed by
2006 Jan 22
0
Latest kde/tetex updates fail on my attempts. Is it me or ...?
Trying to apply the latest updates to an Athalon base fully updated
CentOS 4.2. In the past used the update process kicked off by clicking
the hand-dandy red icon. This failed, so I tried yum. Somewhere in the
process, it complained that there was no GPG key for the lame libraries
(IIRC, everything's a little hazy after all the Googling trying to fix
this).
Anyway, tried "yum
2010 Oct 30
0
RPM DB DSA Signature Errors
Alle,
I'm running CentOS 4.8. I just started seeing these errors during RPM
operations:
error: rpmdbAdd: skipping h# 990 Header V3 DSA signature: BAD, key
ID 443e1821
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 969 Header V3 DSA signature:
BAD, key ID 443e1821
I've cleared out the __db.* files and tried to rebuild the DB with no
luck. I've also tried this:
2019 Jan 04
2
Docker on Centos 7
On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote:
>> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have not found any information in the Docker General Forum.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen this?
2016 Feb 18
2
Substitute pdftk with other command
Il giorno gio, 18/02/2016 alle 17.34 +0100, Yamaban ha scritto:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:07, Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> > Hi, I must migrate a Centos5 server on Centos7
> >
> > On server Centos5 there is a shell procedure witch add to PDF a
> > timestamp like this example:
> >
> > http://i.stack.imgur.com/OBsqX.png
> >
> > with this command:
2014 Aug 15
0
el6 crash-trace-command vendor?
I was running a
rpm -qa --qf "%{vendor} \t\t%{name}\n" |sort|grep -v CentOS
looking for packages from other vendors installed on a machine and noticed a curious sight:
Fujitsu Limited crash-trace-command
It appears I am not the only one who has crash-trace-command from Fujitsu Limited
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1081&start=0#p6688
That
2019 Jan 05
2
Docker on Centos 7
On 01/04/2019 09:16 PM, H wrote:
> On 01/04/2019 08:27 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
>> On 1/4/19 8:22 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
>>> On 1/3/19 10:19 PM, H wrote:
>>>> I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have
2007 Jan 08
2
rpm scriptlet failed
I have a system (Centos 4.4 all packages uptodate) where almost every
rpm or yum operation fails with a message like e.g.:
error: %preun(a2ps-4.13b-41.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255
some times the error is on %post()
the last few lines of output from
rpm -e -vv a2ps
are
D: ========== --- a2ps-4.13b-41 i386-linux 0x1
D: erase: a2ps-4.13b-41 has 316 files, test = 0
D: opening db
2019 Jan 23
2
[supermin PATCH 1/2] rpm: extend the Multiple_matches exception
Add the package that raised the issue, so it can be used to provide
better diagnostic.
---
src/librpm-c.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
src/librpm.ml | 4 ++--
src/librpm.mli | 2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c
index 3bd25a2..75ca4d7 100644
--- a/src/librpm-c.c
+++ b/src/librpm-c.c
@@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ librpm_handle_closed (void)
}
2014 Sep 09
2
C6: why i686 are installed on x86_64 based arch?
Hi all,
I noticed that when I install some packages (precise list not defined),
my x86_64 C6 tends to install both 32bits and 64bits at the same time:
# yum install fontconfig freetype \
libfreetype.so.6 libfontconfig.so.1 \
libstdc++.so.6
Gives: http://pastebin.com/FNzztefV
My repository configuration is same: http://pastebin.com/Hf38sAic
No 3rd party repository.
2019 Jan 04
2
Docker on Centos 7
I recently updated docker to version 18.09 and I seem to have lost the container id in the command prompt when I exec into a running container, a very useful feature in the previous version I was running. I have not found any information in the Docker General Forum.
Has anyone else seen this?
2014 Sep 17
4
[PATCH 0/2] supermin: use librpm for rpm support
Hi,
this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm
directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency
resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems.
Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours
of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point.
Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm
2016 Feb 18
2
Substitute pdftk with other command
Hi, I must migrate a Centos5 server on Centos7
On server Centos5 there is a shell procedure witch add to PDF a
timestamp like this example:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/OBsqX.png
with this command:
$ pdftk input.pdf stamp overlay.pdf output stamped.pdf
Into Centos7 pdftk it is no longer allowed
Someone knows some other command to replace it or other ways to do
this?
Or how I can install pdftk on
2016 Feb 18
0
Substitute pdftk with other command
On 18/02/16 17:20, Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> ATM there is no "ready to install" package directly for Centos 7,
> but try the Centos /RHEL 6 package from there before
> doing the full build circus (requires installed libgcj).
> For this solution it's necessary to break some dependency:
>
> # rpm -ivh ./libgcj-4.4.7-16.el6.x86_64.rpm ./pdftk-2.02-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
2015 Mar 16
4
Re: Can't create any KVM template due to the error with libguestfs
libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64
upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64
atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch
redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch
plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64
patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64
bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64
cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64
ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64
libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64
2006 Oct 03
1
HP Toolbox kills Samba
Hi,
I've encountered the following problem at a client. The problem results
in one or more of the smbd processing continuously grabbing more and more
memory until the system runs out of memory or just becomes unusable due to a
low memory condition. This error is extremely serious as the entire server
is eventually brought down by one error.
After debugging this error at the
2004 May 03
1
Fix for ''firewall'' script on shorewall delete
Hello,
I am using "shorewall add" and "shorewall delete" for dynamically
adding and removing users to VPN chains when connecting to a VPN
gateway.
But ''shorewall delete'' has a little problem to delete the correct
rules.
When issuing "shorewall delete iface:host zone", shorewall
tries to execute rules like:
iptables -D source_chain -s host1 -o