Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "CentOS-6.6 - wget $? returns 0 when invalid protocol used"
2015 Apr 21
1
whois command in c6
On 4/21/2015 9:46 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:39:09AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >the whois command in c6 references whois.v6nic.net for ip addresses in the
>> >43.0.0.0/8 range (and maybe others). v6nic is no longer a valid whois
>> >server, any nets delegated to it should instead be delegated to apnic.
> The distribution
2015 Apr 21
0
whois command in c6
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:39:09AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> the whois command in c6 references whois.v6nic.net for ip addresses in the
> 43.0.0.0/8 range (and maybe others). v6nic is no longer a valid whois
> server, any nets delegated to it should instead be delegated to apnic.
The distribution jwhosis.conf is hopelessly out-of-date. You can
retrieve an up-to-date one from:
2015 Apr 21
4
whois command in c6
the whois command in c6 references whois.v6nic.net for ip addresses in
the 43.0.0.0/8 range (and maybe others). v6nic is no longer a valid
whois server, any nets delegated to it should instead be delegated to apnic.
i have no upstream connections... this change was made in the generic
sources for jwhois some time ago
I see this fix was introduced in F20 here,
2015 Mar 12
0
Java SSLv3 status on CentOS-6.6
On Wed, March 11, 2015 13:46, Grant McChesney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James B. Byrne
> <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone inform me as to whether or not Java on CentOS-6.6 still
>> has SSLv3 enabled? And if it does then how is it disabled?
>>
>>
> James:
>
> Check the java.security file for your JRE. I'm
2015 Mar 11
3
Java SSLv3 status on CentOS-6.6
Can anyone inform me as to whether or not Java on CentOS-6.6 still has
SSLv3 enabled? And if it does then how is it disabled?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1
2020 Jul 03
0
samab-4.10 nsupdate
I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this:
[global]
. . .
dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate
nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g
And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names
. . .
update(nsupdate): SRV
_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca
2020 Jun 25
0
samba-4.10.15 - Unable to demote secodary DC
I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have
run across this:
[root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC
-U"BROCKLEY\administrator"
INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306
/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable
DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA'
INFO 2020-06-25
2020 Jul 02
0
samab-4.10 nsupdate
This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment:
[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist
Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA
Issued Expires Principal
Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020
krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA
[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup
2011 Mar 05
0
[Fwd: Re: Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?]
On Fri, March 4, 2011 14:12, aurfalien at gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
>> --On Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:11 AM -0500 Digimer
>> <linux at alteeve.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in
>>> CentOS 6 when it is released?
>>
>> A new
2020 Jun 30
0
samab-4.10 nsupdate
> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does
> freebsd call it smb4.conf ?),
Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have
answers that are not worth the effort to know.
> try:
> nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g
I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate
does not give any
2020 Jul 02
1
samab-4.10 nsupdate
Thank you for your patience.
On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote:
>
> From 'man smb.conf':
>
> nsupdate command (G)
>
> This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for
> GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates.
>
> Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g
>
> dns update command (G)
>
> This
2014 Dec 10
0
CentOS-6.6 - Selinux and Postfix-2.11.1
On Tue, December 9, 2014 18:45, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 09.12.2014 um 23:04 schrieb James B. Byrne:
>> Applied policy update. Now I see these occasionally. But by the time I try
>> and
>> see what the matter is the file is gone:
>
> Why do you start a new thread instead of continuing the old one about
> the very same topic?
>
If you have a way to thread
2015 Jan 19
0
CentOS-6.6 Fail2Ban and Postfix Selinux AVCs
On Mon, January 19, 2015 11:50, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am seeing these in the log of one of our off-site NX hosts running
> CentOS-6.6.
>
> type=AVC msg=audit(1421683972.786:4372): avc: denied { create } for
> pid=22788 comm="iptables" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tclass=rawip_socket
> Was caused by:
2015 Apr 01
0
SELinux on CentOS-6.6
I wish to reuse ports 80 and 443 for a different service. When I try
to assign the port context for that service I get this:
/usr/sbin/semanage: Port tcp/80 already defined
When I try to delete the assigned context then I get this:
semanage port -d -t http_port_t -p tcp 80
/usr/sbin/semanage: Port tcp/80 is defined in policy, cannot be deleted
httpd is not installed on this host. But looking
2015 Jul 27
0
Building aubit on CentOS-6.6
Has anyone here packaged aubit 4GL on CentOS-6? If so would you share
your spec file?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
2015 Oct 27
0
CentOS-6.6 SELinux questions
we have remote server running as a guest instance on a kvm host. This
server acts as a public MX service for our domains along with
providing a backup for our Mailman mailing lists. It also has a slave
named service.
while tracking down a separate problem I discovered these avc
anomalies and ran audit2allow to see what was required to eliminate
them. All the software is either from CentOS or
2005 May 09
0
DNS configuration problem
I have introduced some error in my dns resolution and I would like
some help fixing it as I cannot seem to detect what I have done
wrong. Briefly the setup is this:
name servers:
DNS01 - 216.185.71.33
DNS02 - 209.47.176.33
DNS03 - 216.185.71.34
DNS04 - 209.47.176.34 - offline
DNS01 is a master
DNS02-04 are slaves of 216.185.71.33
All are listed as authoritative for the zone test.com
The
2020 Jul 07
0
How to delete an unwanted NS record
On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote:
> I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca:
>
> samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca
> ALL -U administrator
> Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]:
> Name=, Records=6, Children=0
> SOA: serial=7, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600,
>
2020 Jul 07
2
How to delete an unwanted NS record
I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca:
samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca
ALL -U administrator
Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]:
Name=, Records=6, Children=0
SOA: serial=7, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600,
ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=support.harte-lyne.ca.
(flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600)
2020 Jul 08
0
How to delete an unwanted NS record
On 07.07.2020 22:14, Mani Wieser via samba wrote:
>
> On 07.07.2020 21:14, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>> On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote:
>>> I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca:
>>>
>>> samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca
>>> brockley.harte-lyne.ca
>>> ALL -U administrator