Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base"
2015 Apr 19
0
yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base
Richard <lists-centos at ...> writes:
>
>
> ------------ Original Message ------------
> > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 18:44:43 +0000
> > From: Sarogahtyp <sarogahtyp at ...>
> > To: centos at ...
> > Subject: [CentOS] yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base
> >
> > I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to
>
2015 Apr 19
0
yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base
I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to have a
CentOS 7 chrooted system inside.
Ive done that chroot environment as described in
http://www.jefftk.com/p/32-bit-chroot-on-centos
Now my problem ist that yum is not working as i suggested:
bash-4.2# yum install sudo
Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14]
2019 Apr 18
2
epel-repository | repomd.xml.asc: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404
Hi.
I try to install openvpn at my centos 7 server (CentOS Linux release
7.6.1810 (Core)).
According to many tutorials at the internet, I was using
yum install epel-release -y to enable the repo.
When (after installing epel-release) I try to install openvpn using
yum install openvpn -y
I get this error:
Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
2005 Oct 17
0
:Re: Unknown PAM failiure in WIN2003/ Active Directory + samba
Huh....2.6.16.4....i mean! :)
In smb.conf, i removed obey pam restrictions and now it works...
What does "obey pam restrictions" do ?
Cheers,
Phil.
-
Hash: SHA1
Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) escreveu:
> Hello,
> I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux
> server with samba/kerberos support for unified logon authentication.
> Normally, everything
2005 Oct 17
1
:Re: Unknown PAM failiure in WIN2003/ Active Directory + samba
Damn, 2.6.13.4 i REALLY mean! :)
(i probably need a holliday!)
Huh....2.6.16.4....i mean! :)
In smb.conf, i removed obey pam restrictions and now it works...
What does "obey pam restrictions" do ?
Cheers,
Phil.
-
Hash: SHA1
Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) escreveu:
> Hello,
> I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux
> server with samba/kerberos
2005 Oct 17
1
Unknown PAM failiure in WIN2003/ Active Directory + samba
Hello,
I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux
server with samba/kerberos support for unified logon authentication.
Normally, everything is installed & this is the configuration:
- Debian with 2.6.16.4 kernel
- heimdal kerberos
- samba log info:
log.smbd:
[2005/10/17 10:48:26, 0] smbd/server.c:main(798)
smbd version 3.0.14a-Debian started.
2019 Jun 18
1
some questsions to online backup and a failiure with offline backup
Hi,
first online backup works, but why some parts are missing?
Online:
root# samba-tool domain backup online --targetdir=/mnt/backup/online/
--server=DC -UAdministrator
Backup created 2019-Jun-18 11:04:19
Using samba-tool version: Samba 4.10.2
Domain online backup, using DC 'DOMAIN'
Backup for domain DOMAIN (NetBIOS), DOMAIN (DNS realm)
Backup contains domain secrets: True
missing
2009 Jul 13
1
Ubuntu und R
Hallo Zusammen,
hatte gestern die Schnauze voll von Vista und habe mir daraufhin Ubuntu
installiert. Bin also mit Ubuntu ?berhaupt nicht vertraut.
Nun habe ich ohne Erfolg versucht, R zu installieren.
Soweit ich der Anleitung folgen konnte habe ich es so wie auf
http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/R gemacht.
Im Terminal kann ich R problemlos starten.
Allerdings bei der Installation von
2015 May 24
2
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It looks like the culprit is IPv6 according to a post on the CentOS
Mirrors mailing list
(http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2015-May/008847.html):
> Hello,
>
> mirrorlist.centos.org currently doesn't correctly answer on IPv6 -
> The request succeeds superficially (200 OK), but the answer is
> empty:
>
> ~ $
2015 Dec 16
5
"installation source" specification for netinstall
On 12/15/2015 06:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 3:55 PM, ken wrote:
>> On 12/15/2015 04:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2015 12:29 PM, ken wrote:
>>>> centos 7 (7.1). Three places on the web said
>>>>
>>>> mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/
>>>
>>>
>>> oh, the /7/ directory is now 7.2, so you
2004 May 28
1
asterisk console messages
was wondering if someone could give any indication of the messages that are
appearing on the console of an Asterisk PBX
WARNING[1116941120]: chan_sip.c:532 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on
call ....@192.168.90.1 for seqno 103 (non-critical request)
192.168.90.1 is a 7940 ip phone configured as a SIP dial peer on asterisk
pbx
i mght added that the call seems to take place ok but this
2015 Apr 03
5
Installing HomeBank on CentOS 7.1
Hi
I have recently installed CentOS 7.1 on my laptop. Earlier i was using
Ubuntu 14.04.
I have managed to successfully install all the apps that i was using in
ubuntu in CentOS 7.1 except for the app named as: HomeBank
http://homebank.free.fr/
Here is the information about my system:
[jatin at localhost ~]$ cat /etc/*release
CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
NAME="CentOS Linux"
2015 Dec 15
2
"installation source" specification for netinstall
On 12/15/2015 04:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 12:29 PM, ken wrote:
>> centos 7 (7.1). Three places on the web said
>>
>> mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/
>
>
> oh, the /7/ directory is now 7.2, so you likely should be using the 7.2
> netinstall.
>
> if you really want 7.1, try...
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7.1.1503/os/x86_64/
2006 Feb 23
1
tcl/tk - Problem unter MacOS X / X11
Hallo !
Ich habe versucht Rcmdr unter MacOSX 10.4.5 zu installieren. RGui zeigt
an, dass tcl/tk laufen. Bei Aufruf von Rcmdr friert R jedoch komplett ein.
JGR zeigt im Paketmanager dagegen an, dass tcl/tk nicht gestartet werden
konnte und spuckt folgende Meldung aus:
> library(tcltk)
Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... Error in fun(...) : no display name and no
$DISPLAY environment variable
2010 Jul 20
1
Sieve Installation
Hallo
Versuche unter OpenSuse11.2, 64bit sieve zu installieren.
Konfig: OpensSuse 11.2, dovecot 1.2.9, postfix , spamassassin, amavis, mysql
Wenn ich versucht dovecot sieve zu ?bersetzen bekomme ich immer folgende
Fehlermeldung:
Mit freundlichem Gru?
Carsten Laun-De Lellis
Dipl.-Ing. Elektrotechnik
Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA)
Hauptstrasse 13
D-67705 Trippstadt
Phone:
2015 Dec 07
2
Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On 12/07/2015 05:46 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>>
>>> IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large
>>> enterprise environment. It is usually blocked.
>>>
>>
>> Does google
2016 Jan 01
2
NFS problem after 7.2
On 01.01.2016 12:23, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/01/2016 01:55 AM, Mark wrote:
>> The command 'yum downgrade nfs-utils' just
>> returns nothing to do. I've searched centos.org to find the previous
>> package nfs-utils-1.3.0-0.8.el7.x86_64.rpm to manually download and
>> install, but haven't found it. What is actually the best way to do a
>>
2016 Jan 01
2
NFS problem after 7.2
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 10:16 -0700, Brandon Vincent wrote:
> Looks like upstream is working on it [1]. According to the BZ, the
> solution for now is to downgrade nfs-utils [2].
Thank you for spotting that one!
Don't know it's because I'm still tired from yesterday, but don't seem
to be able to downgrade. The command 'yum downgrade nfs-utils' just
returns nothing to
2015 Dec 07
4
Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and internally
>> CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an issue?
>
> Yes. It confuses humans. There have been a bunch of examples given of
> how it confuses
2015 Dec 04
1
7.2 kernel panic on boot
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
> see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
I know this is a big, confused thread, but the main complaint is that
the website has dropped the fully qualified numbering: