similar to: yum-config-manager, does --save/--setopt work?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "yum-config-manager, does --save/--setopt work?"

2018 May 16
1
Persisting Routes In A Routing Table Other Than The Default
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 13:04 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> said: > > Rules load automatically via the /etc/sysconfig/network- > > scripts/rules- > > {interface} files.??Routes added to /etc/sysconfig/network- > > scripts/routes-{interface} are always added to the default policy. > What are you
2016 Sep 19
5
Upgraded SAMBA4 DC's, now no logon scripts
Logon scripts assigned to a user do not execute when the user logs on; it did before the upgrade. I can run the script from the command line and it completes OK [like \\{DOMAIN}\netlogon\logon.bat]. I can also browse to the [netlogon] share without issue. Upgrade was from a late 4.0.x to 4.1.x to current 4.2.x. User's can logon without other issues [apparently]. Platform: CentOS7
2018 May 15
2
Persisting Routes In A Routing Table Other Than The Default
I need to add persistent routes to a policy routing table. I can add rules to an IP policy table after installing NetworkManager-config- routing-rules; but I have not found how to add routes to a table other than the specific table. Manually I do a: ip route add default via 192.168.1.6 dev ens192 table pods Rules load automatically via the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rules- {interface}
2016 Sep 19
2
"Unable to fetch value for secret ..., are we an undetected RODC?"
Since upgrading S4 DCs I am see the following message in log.samba - DsCrackNames: Unsupported operation requested: FFFFFFF8DsCrackNames: Unsupported operation requested: FFFFFFF8Unable to fetch value for secret BCKUPKEY_13bb48fc-0844-4736-9972-e26453333856, are we an undetected RODC? DsCrackNames: Unsupported operation requested: FFFFFFF8DsCrackNames: Unsupported operation requested:
2014 Aug 12
1
Sysvol "incorrect parameter" on some new DC's
I have a site with a working Samba4 AD domain with a single DC. It works. I've added three new DCs to the domain [using the SerNet packages for 4.0.21]. The intention is to then demote the old, original Samba4 DC. But problems exist for netlogon/sysvol. One of the new DCs - the second one added - works, clients can access netlogon & sysvol. However the other two DCs have ACL errors
2014 Aug 12
2
Four DCs, No Replication
I added three DCs to a single DC Samba4 AD domain. They initially replicated and came up - but replication does not appear to be ongoing. A change made to a user via MMC connected to one DC does not appear on another DC. It the logs I see bursts of the following message: [2014/08/12 15:08:08.026270, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:660(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid
2016 Dec 13
1
Doubt about Global Catalog on Samba 4
> > Initially, it appears to have worked. ... > > It shows the same on one of the S4 DCs, but the > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole still shows as "no current owner" on the > > third S4 DC [all Sernet 4.5.2].  Argh. > You could try checking the database on the third DC, 'samba-tool > dbcheck --help' for more info. > You could also try forcing
2016 Sep 19
2
Upgraded SAMBA4 DC's, now no logon scripts
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 20:57 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > > Logon scripts assigned to a user do not execute when the user logs > > on; it did before the upgrade. > * What kind of upgrade are you talking about? > NT4 to AD? (migration) > x.y to 4.2? AD 4.0.21 -> 4.2.x This worked prior to the upgrade. > * Is this an PDC or DC? They are DCs. > * Where have you
2016 Dec 12
2
Doubt about Global Catalog on Samba 4
> You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > Just what version of Samba are you using ? My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. Can I simply seize these roles? [root at larkin27 ~]# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=TEMP2008R2DC,CN=Servers,.. InfrastructureMasterRole owner:
2016 Mar 13
0
Failed to modify SPNs on error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19)
Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2016, 10:41:34 CET schrieb mathias dufresne: Hi, Mathias and all thank you for your answer. > Hi all, > > SPN = servicePrincipalName > > A simple search returning all servicePrincipalName declared in your AD: > ldbsearch -H $sam serviceprincipalname=* serviceprincipalname > For me: ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb serviceprincipalname=*
2016 Mar 10
2
Failed to modify SPNs on error in module acl: Constraint violation during LDB_MODIFY (19)
Hi all, SPN = servicePrincipalName A simple search returning all servicePrincipalName declared in your AD: ldbsearch -H $sam serviceprincipalname=* serviceprincipalname An extract from result concerning a lambda client: # record 41 dn: CN=win-client345,OU=Machines,DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=tld servicePrincipalName: HOST/MB38W746-0009 servicePrincipalName: HOST/MB38W746-0009.ad.domain.tld
2015 Apr 12
2
Removed old DC, now replication hopelessly broken [HELP]
I removed a DC using the DC removal tool mentioned in http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3 as https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10734 prevents normal DC demotion. The DC was still all over in DNS, so I had to pick it out. Now replication between the remaining three DCs is broken [root at larkin26 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl
2015 Apr 12
0
Removed old DC, now replication hopelessly broken [SOLVED]
On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 16:14 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I removed a DC using the DC removal tool mentioned in > http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3 > as https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10734 prevents normal DC > demotion. > The DC was still all over in DNS, so I had to pick it out. > Now replication between
2016 Sep 19
0
Error "Failed extended allocation RID pool operation..."
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 09:31 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams via samba wrote: > Package: sernet-samba-4.2.14-23.el6.x86_64 > These DCs were very recently upgraded from a prior version. > [2016/09/19 09:32:55.168161, 0] > ../source4/libcli/smb2/signing.c:116(smb2_check_signature) > Bad SMB2 signature for message of size 202 > ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:807: Failed
2016 Nov 20
0
4.5.1 Upgrade Breaks Samba [Was: Schema Change Breaks Replication]
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 21:11 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:55:08 -0500 > Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > And it looks like nobody is listening on port 135 - > > [root at larkin26 ~]# netstat --listen --inet --program --numeric > > Active Internet connections (only servers) > > Proto Recv-Q
2016 Nov 21
0
4.5.1 Upgrade Breaks Samba [Was: Schema Change Breaks Replication]
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 13:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:50 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams via samba > wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 21:11 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:55:08 -0500 > > > Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > And it looks like nobody is
2016 Dec 13
2
Doubt about Global Catalog on Samba 4
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. > > Can I simply seize these roles? > > [root at larkin27 ~]#
2015 Apr 14
0
wbinfo -u/-g/-n works, but not 'wbinfo -i' or 'id'
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 15:20 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 14/04/15 14:59, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 13:41 -0300, Horacio G. de Oro wrote: > >> Hi! I'm trying to add a member to be used as fileserver, following the > >> guides at: > >> - https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server > >> -
2016 Sep 19
1
Getting rIDNextRID errors after upgrading two samba ADs to 4.2
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 15:20 +0200, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: > On 04/08/2016 08:36 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: > > We finally managed to upgrade from samba 4.1 to 4.2.9 (sernet > > packages). We have two replicated samba ADs. After the upgrade > > everything seems to work as expected, but I'm constantly getting > > this error message
2016 Nov 20
0
4.5.1 Upgrade Breaks Samba [Was: Schema Change Breaks Replication]
On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 09:57 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 09:41 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 21:32 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > I believe a schema change on a Windows DC (2008rc) has > > > > > > broken > > > > sernet-samba-4.2.14-23.el6.x86_64 - the same package on all > > > >