similar to: OT: Recommended anti-virus for Windows

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's the current best recommendation? Thanks, MArtin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVHbCMAAoJEAF3yXsqtyBl4I8P/AsvH+cyGcG9PDtL8I091WJc

On Thu, April 2, 2015 4:11 pm, J Martin Rushton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's > laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's > the current best recommendation? For privately owned machine I would recommend free.avg.com - one free

On Thu, April 2, 2015 4:27 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, April 2, 2015 4:11 pm, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's >> laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's >> the current best

On Sat, April 18, 2015 11:16, Jake Shipton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 16/04/15 16:01, James B. Byrne wrote: >> This morning I discovered this in my clamav report from one of our >> imap servers: >> >> /usr/share/nmap/scripts/irc-unrealircd-backdoor.nse: >> Unix.Trojan.MSShellcode-21 FOUND >> >> >> I

On Mon, January 12, 2015 09:40, Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the > second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that > there is already an instance running. Rebooting the second machine > will not help. The

CentOS-6.6 Postfix-2.11.1 (local) ClamAV-0.98.5 (epel) Amavisd-new-2.9.1 (epel) opendkim-2.9.0 (centos) pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1 (epel) Is there something going on in selinuxland with respect to clamav, amavisd-new and postfix? Since the most recent update of clamav I seem to be detecting more avc's. It may be that it is because I am looking for them more frequently but it seems to me that

This morning I discovered this in my clamav report from one of our imap servers: /usr/share/nmap/scripts/irc-unrealircd-backdoor.nse: Unix.Trojan.MSShellcode-21 FOUND I have looked at this script and it appears to be part of the nmap distribution. It actually tests for irc backdoors. IRC is not used here and its ports are blocked by default both at the gateway and on all internal hosts.

We use Cyrus-imapd together with Postix to effect final delivery of email messages to our clients. The final delivery server is isolated from the internet via a firewall and only pre-authorized host addresses can connect. All user pickup and delivery email traffic is handled through separate Internet accessible hosts that may establish these connections. The Internet facing hosts have Postfix

On Tue, January 19, 2016 18:36, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/19/2016 3:29 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> I suspect that the gold layer on edge connectors 30-odd years ago >> was >> a lot thicker than on modern cards. We are talking contacts on 0.1" >> spacing not some modern 1/10 of a knat's whisker. (Off topic) I >> also >> remember seeing

In consequence of this thread I went looking for a probe script that would send individualized email messages to each subscriber of a mailman list and found none. Does such a thing in fact exist? It seems to me that this would be an invaluable tool in tracking down which subscriber is the bot-bait. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive

I have a CentOS-6 guest VM configured on a CentOS-6 host. If I run virt-manager then I can start the guest VM but once it is running I cannot get a shutdown command to have effect. To shutdown the running guest I either must select Force Off from the Shut Down menu or open the guest console and issue shutdown from the command line. Is there some setting that is required to have Shut Down have

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have run across this: [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC -U"BROCKLEY\administrator" INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306 /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA' INFO 2020-06-25

This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup

On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean >>> setting >>> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >>> >> Anyone see any problem

On Mon, June 25, 2007 08:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-request at centos.org > > You can reach the

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I have introduced some error in my dns resolution and I would like some help fixing it as I cannot seem to detect what I have done wrong. Briefly the setup is this: name servers: DNS01 - 216.185.71.33 DNS02 - 209.47.176.33 DNS03 - 216.185.71.34 DNS04 - 209.47.176.34 - offline DNS01 is a master DNS02-04 are slaves of 216.185.71.33 All are listed as authoritative for the zone test.com The

On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: > I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca: > > samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca > ALL -U administrator > Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: > Name=, Records=6, Children=0 > SOA: serial=7, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, >