similar to: Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path"

2015 Mar 30
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: > We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15 > or newer. We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know > it can't be replaced as it's an integral part of the OS. > > However, is it possible to build a glib 2.15 RPM from source to be
2015 Mar 31
3
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 17:24, Patrick Flaherty <pflaherty at wsi.com> wrote: > > Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really > not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new > install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable > thing to do, and if you do anything else and make anyone else
2015 Mar 31
2
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On 03/31/2015 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: >> >>> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really >>> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new >>> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only
2015 Mar 31
2
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: > On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > >>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve? >> >> >> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app. > > Perhaps, but I?m running CentOS 6.6
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: > >> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really >> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new >> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable >> thing to do, and if you do anything else and
2017 Aug 28
2
Problem installing glibc-devel.i686 on CentOS 7
The following transcript should provide all the necessary details: # yum install glibc-devel-2.17-157.el7.i686 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.gigenet.com * epel: mirrors.xmission.com * extras: mirrors.gigenet.com * updates: ftp.osuosl.org Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package
2014 Feb 24
3
Need help resolving yum update issues on mixed architecture system
I have been using 32-bit CentOS since the 4.X days without a real need for 64-bit, but in preparation for CentOS 7, I have installed 64-bit CentOS 6 on a test system to qualify all our builds. However, in order to build some of our current 32-bit applications, I had to install some i686 packages, including glib. Now when I try to do a "yum update" on this test system, I get the dreaded
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> > wrote: >> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >> >>>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve? >>> >>> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: >> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve? > > > Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app. Perhaps, but I?m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears that Docker requires 64-bit. Oh well, I was getting my hopes up for a while. In the
2016 Jul 01
2
how to update glib-2.28.8 to glib-2.40.0 or newer version
Hi, I'm trying to build gstreamer sdk on centos 6.7. When configure is run for 'gstreamer-1.8.2.tar.xz' on centos 6.7, error messages are reported as below: checking for GLIB... no configure: Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.40.0' but version of GLib is 2.28.8 configure: error: This package requires GLib >= 2.40.0 to compile. The command of 'yum install glib*' can only
2008 Mar 21
2
glibc error ???
On a centos 4.6 box rpm -qa | grep glib glib-1.2.10-15 glibc-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 glib2-2.4.7-1 I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 *** While I am researching this more, I am wondering if the
2016 Aug 24
4
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
Hello all-- Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12, and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me. I really like CentOS and would
2006 Oct 02
5
Yet another yum/rpm update problem
I am in the process of updating a dozen or so workstations from CentOS 4.3 to CentOS 4.4. I set up a local YUM repository, and have been able to successfully update all systems except for one. Both yum and rpm either hang or core dump on this system. I've done a "yum clean all" and an "rpm --rebuilddb" (after deleting the __db files). I was able to
2016 Aug 25
3
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm >> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. > > > Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I think John's question
2009 Sep 21
2
sed (or other) magic to get RPM base names ?
Hey folks, Once upon a time I saw some sed magic to take the output of "rpm -qa" and strip away all the version info to give just the RPM base names. And of course I forgot to note it :-/ And have not been able to replicate it myself. e.g. from this : avahi-0.6.16-1.el5 avahi-glib-0.6.16-1.el5 produce this : avahi avahi-glib thanks, -Alan -- ?Don't eat anything you've
2017 Aug 28
0
Problem installing glibc-devel.i686 on CentOS 7
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: > The following transcript should provide all the necessary details: > > # yum install glibc-devel-2.17-157.el7.i686 > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * base: mirrors.gigenet.com > * epel: mirrors.xmission.com > * extras:
2016 Jan 27
2
Alternative HTML Editor
On 01/27/2016 02:47 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: >> /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin: error while loading shared libraries: >> libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or >> directory >> >> > Have you tried yum provides 'libdbus-glib-1.so.2'. I get a hit with > dbus-glib Thanks. Package dbus-glib-0.86-6.el6.x86_64 already
2013 Jun 05
5
[LLVMdev] clang/llvm with glibc
This question has been asked occasionally with no positive responses. Has anybody had success compiling glib with clang/llvm? If so, can you share any details? If not, are there any good libc replacements with more complete functionality than newlib? Thanks, dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2006 Jun 12
1
Ruuid had non-zero exit status (PR#8965)
> source("http://www.bioconductor.org/biocLite.R") > biocLite(c("Ruuid")) Running getBioC version 0.1.6 with R version 2.3.1 Running biocinstall version 1.8.4 with R version 2.3.1 Your version of R requires version 1.8 of Bioconductor. trying URL 'http://bioconductor.org/packages/1.8/bioc/src/contrib/Ruuid_1.10.0.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip'
2007 Mar 21
4
Will Firefox 2.X be included/supported in CentOS 5?
I know this mostly depends on what is/will be done upstream, but with the recent announcement that Firefox 1.5.X will only receive updates until April 24, 2007, is Firefox 2.X in CentOS' future? Alfred