Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path"
2015 Mar 30
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com>
wrote:
> We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15
> or newer. We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know
> it can't be replaced as it's an integral part of the OS.
>
> However, is it possible to build a glib 2.15 RPM from source to be
2015 Mar 31
3
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 17:24, Patrick Flaherty <pflaherty at wsi.com> wrote:
>
> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable
> thing to do, and if you do anything else and make anyone else
2015 Mar 31
2
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On 03/31/2015 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
>>> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
>>> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only
2015 Mar 31
2
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:
>
>>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>>
>>
>> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
>
> Perhaps, but I?m running CentOS 6.6
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote:
>
>> Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
>> not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
>> install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable
>> thing to do, and if you do anything else and
2017 Aug 28
2
Problem installing glibc-devel.i686 on CentOS 7
The following transcript should provide all the necessary details:
# yum install glibc-devel-2.17-157.el7.i686
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirrors.gigenet.com
* epel: mirrors.xmission.com
* extras: mirrors.gigenet.com
* updates: ftp.osuosl.org
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package
2014 Feb 24
3
Need help resolving yum update issues on mixed architecture system
I have been using 32-bit CentOS since the 4.X days without a real need for 64-bit, but in preparation for CentOS 7, I have installed 64-bit CentOS 6 on a test system to qualify all our builds. However, in order to build some of our current 32-bit applications, I had to install some i686 packages, including glib.
Now when I try to do a "yum update" on this test system, I get the dreaded
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com>
> wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:
>>
>>>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>>>
>>> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the
2015 Mar 31
0
Building a newer glibc RPM for CentOS 6 and installing into an alternate path
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:
>> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
>
>
> Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but I?m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears that
Docker requires 64-bit. Oh well, I was getting my hopes up for a while. In
the
2016 Jul 01
2
how to update glib-2.28.8 to glib-2.40.0 or newer version
Hi,
I'm trying to build gstreamer sdk on centos 6.7. When configure is run for 'gstreamer-1.8.2.tar.xz' on centos 6.7, error messages are reported as below:
checking for GLIB... no
configure: Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.40.0' but version of GLib is 2.28.8
configure: error: This package requires GLib >= 2.40.0 to compile.
The command of 'yum install glib*' can only
2008 Mar 21
2
glibc error ???
On a centos 4.6 box
rpm -qa | grep glib
glib-1.2.10-15
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39
dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
glib2-2.4.7-1
I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 ***
While I am researching this more, I am wondering if the
2016 Aug 24
4
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
Hello all--
Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12,
and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib
available anywhere that might work with my current 6.8. I see I can
download it from SourceForge but I am wondering what the results might me.
I really like CentOS and would
2006 Oct 02
5
Yet another yum/rpm update problem
I am in the process of updating a dozen or so workstations from
CentOS 4.3 to CentOS 4.4. I set up a local YUM repository, and have
been able to successfully update all systems except for one. Both
yum and rpm either hang or core dump on this system. I've done a
"yum clean all" and an "rpm --rebuilddb" (after deleting the __db
files). I was able to
2016 Aug 25
3
I need glibc 2.19+ for 32 bit CentOS 6.8 or CentOS7
On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
>> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19.
>
>
> Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I
think John's question
2009 Sep 21
2
sed (or other) magic to get RPM base names ?
Hey folks,
Once upon a time I saw some sed magic to take the output of "rpm -qa"
and strip away all the version info to give just the RPM base names.
And of course I forgot to note it :-/ And have not been able to
replicate it myself.
e.g. from this :
avahi-0.6.16-1.el5
avahi-glib-0.6.16-1.el5
produce this :
avahi
avahi-glib
thanks,
-Alan
--
?Don't eat anything you've
2017 Aug 28
0
Problem installing glibc-devel.i686 on CentOS 7
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com>
wrote:
> The following transcript should provide all the necessary details:
>
> # yum install glibc-devel-2.17-157.el7.i686
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * base: mirrors.gigenet.com
> * epel: mirrors.xmission.com
> * extras:
2016 Jan 27
2
Alternative HTML Editor
On 01/27/2016 02:47 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
>> /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
>> libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
>> directory
>>
>>
> Have you tried yum provides 'libdbus-glib-1.so.2'. I get a hit with
> dbus-glib
Thanks.
Package dbus-glib-0.86-6.el6.x86_64 already
2013 Jun 05
5
[LLVMdev] clang/llvm with glibc
This question has been asked occasionally with no positive responses.
Has anybody had success compiling glib with clang/llvm? If so, can you
share any details?
If not, are there any good libc replacements with more complete
functionality than newlib?
Thanks, dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2006 Jun 12
1
Ruuid had non-zero exit status (PR#8965)
> source("http://www.bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
> biocLite(c("Ruuid"))
Running getBioC version 0.1.6 with R version 2.3.1
Running biocinstall version 1.8.4 with R version 2.3.1
Your version of R requires version 1.8 of Bioconductor.
trying URL
'http://bioconductor.org/packages/1.8/bioc/src/contrib/Ruuid_1.10.0.tar.gz'
Content type 'application/x-gzip'
2007 Mar 21
4
Will Firefox 2.X be included/supported in CentOS 5?
I know this mostly depends on what is/will be done upstream, but with
the recent announcement that Firefox 1.5.X will only receive updates
until April 24, 2007, is Firefox 2.X in CentOS' future?
Alfred