similar to: Updates repo - release candidate package?

Where on the CentOS website does one find the CentOS-6 CR repo install package? I can find the one for CentOS-5 but not for 6. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

Can anyone inform me as to whether or not Java on CentOS-6.6 still has SSLv3 enabled? And if it does then how is it disabled? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

I saw this on one of the host when we applied the most recent policy update: Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6_6.2.noarch 2/6 semodule: link.c:840: alias_copy_callback: Assertion `base_type->primary == target_type->s.value' failed. What does this mean? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0672 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0672.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5616945350f23f5fd92e854dadb5de2c9c35c8afbe49cf931c3d4b3be6d528d6 bind-9.8.2-0.30.rc1.el6_6.2.i686.rpm

libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64 patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64 bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64 cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64 ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64 libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64

i86_64 CentOS-6.5 Samba-4.1.4-7 (sernet) MS-Win2000 Advanced Server AD DC I am following the HowTo provided at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC. I am at this point: ---> In this case, 737506d0-bfe6-40c8-815d-08c3dff7a67f is the objectGUID of the new DC, we'll query with the following command: # host -t CNAME

This morning I see this in the syslog on our primary public DNS host. internal_send: 142.77.1.1#33950: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#35153: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#35644: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#49394: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#49816: Connection timed

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Restarting one of our named services produces this entry in the system log file: Oct 12 08:47:45 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/named from search access on the directory . For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 9eabadb9-0e03-4238-bdb8-c5204333a0bf Checking the selinux incident reference shows this: # sealert -l 9eabadb9-0e03-4238-bdb8-c5204333a0bf SELinux is

On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, nux at li.nux.ro wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes: > >> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All >> that is >> necessary is for several people use packages from >> testing repo and >> report that they are working without issues to the >> Centos-devel mailing >> list in this thread: >>

This is the same origin that I reported on earlier. Apparently asking for an explanation of why they were probing our sites only encouraged them to make additional attempts. sshd: Authentication Failures: unknown (ip-173-201-178-18.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-196-33.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-202-95.ip.secureserver.net): 2

I did a yum update to my desktop machine as root this morning and now my regular logon account sees this whenever I press the enter key: etc/audisp/audispd.conf: Permission denied etc/audisp/plugins.d/af_unix.conf: Permission denied etc/audisp/plugins.d/syslog.conf: Permission denied etc/audit/audit.rules: Permission denied etc/audit/auditd.conf: Permission deniedetc/dhcp/dhclient.d/ntp.sh:

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I read this on the RHN commentary respecting cve-2014-3566: https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/10/15/poodle-a-ssl3-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566/: . . . The first aspect of POODLE, the SSL 3.0 protocol vulnerability, has already been fixed through iterative protocol improvements, leading to the current TLS version, 1.2. It is simply not possible to address this in the context of the SSL 3.0

I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have run across this: [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC -U"BROCKLEY\administrator" INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306 /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA' INFO 2020-06-25

I have introduced some error in my dns resolution and I would like some help fixing it as I cannot seem to detect what I have done wrong. Briefly the setup is this: name servers: DNS01 - 216.185.71.33 DNS02 - 209.47.176.33 DNS03 - 216.185.71.34 DNS04 - 209.47.176.34 - offline DNS01 is a master DNS02-04 are slaves of 216.185.71.33 All are listed as authoritative for the zone test.com The