Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "grsync for centos 7"
2015 Mar 10
1
grsync for centos 7
On Mon, March 9, 2015 17:36, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Francis Gerund wrote:
> <snip>
>> And FWIW, I do like, and use the CLI all the time. That's how I
>> learned
> - using MS-DOS 3.2 on a 386sx box with 360k floppy drives. And 512k
> ram
> - what luxury!
>>
>> : )
>
> You leaned on a 386 with (2?) floppy drives? I had to make do
>
2015 Mar 06
1
grsync for centos 7
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:30:15PM -0600, Francis Gerund wrote:
> 5) If Grsync was in centos before, why was it removed? "Because it's not
> in RHEL." Okay, but why not?
I can't find any evidence it was ever in RHEL or CentOS. It looks
like it's in the Nux Desktop repo and the Repoforge repo for EL5 and 6 and
Nux for EL7.
> 6) While I do really appreciate CLI
2015 Mar 05
3
grsync for centos 7
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Francis Gerund <ranrund at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I think it is just too easy to make mistakes with rsync. And getting it
> > "almost correct" can really get you hurt.
>
> What are you trying to do, and what kind of
2015 Mar 05
5
grsync for centos 7
Hello.
I think it is just too easy to make mistakes with rsync. And getting it
"almost correct" can really get you hurt.
So I would like to learn with Grsync.
But, Grsync does not seem to be in the centos 7 or EPEL 7 repositories
(although it may have been around as late as centos 6). Is it now in any
"reputable" repositories?
If not, has anyone installed it from source
2015 Mar 05
0
grsync for centos 7
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Francis Gerund <ranrund at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I think it is just too easy to make mistakes with rsync. And getting it
> "almost correct" can really get you hurt.
What are you trying to do, and what kind of mistakes are you worried
about? The only things I find confusing are what the trailing /
means on a directory name
2015 Apr 11
1
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
Yes, that is very much like the problem I encountered, but in my case it
did not need multiple monitors to happen, just one. The config file
suggested did seem to fix the problem, at least serving as a (hopefully)
temporary workaround.
Johnny, thanks for the pointer. And thanks to all who replied.
P.S. - the workaround seems to work with both the latest "standard" Centos
7 kernel
2015 Apr 04
4
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
Is there a way in Centos 7 to boot into an alternate video setup?
Some distributions have an option to boot into something called VESA (or
something similar). Something that might not have the fanciest features,
but more likely to at least just work.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Francis Gerund <ranrund at gmail.com> wrote:
> Updated the kernel as suggested to 3.19, did not solve
2015 Apr 04
2
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
Okay, thanks to all who took the time to reply.
What a shame; I hadn't planned on spending Easter weekend learning to do
kernel upgrades, but . . . here it goes.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/04/15 20:41, Francis Gerund wrote:
> > Well, it could be the same, but the bug report does seem to refer to the
>
2015 Apr 03
2
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
Well, it could be the same, but the bug report does seem to refer to the
bug being in kernel series 3.18. I am just using whatever 3.10 series
kernel comes standard with Centos 7.x.
I don't know anything about bug reports, and I an not familiar with
swapping out kernels in Centos.
BTW, is El Repo another name for the EPEL repository?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi
2019 Apr 21
1
Do grsync/rsync work well on Mac?
Hi,
I experience a slow backup problem with Time Machine on Mac. The info
below does not help to reduce the backup time to a reasonable period.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204412
So I'd like to use grsync/rsync to incrementally back my disk. I know
that Time Machine somehow can create hard links to manage incremental
links. Since grsync/rsync is primarily targeted at Linux, is it a
2012 Nov 09
2
[LLVMdev] inttoptr and basicaa
BasicAA treats it conservatively if used on its own. It will return
mayalias for the two pointers.
TBAA operates based on the guarantee that pointers to different types
cannot alias (think C's strict aliasing rules).
Therein lies its power but also its danger, that is, nothing prevents the
programmer to write code that violates these rules (That's why we have
-fno-strict-aliasing).
So
2015 Mar 05
0
grsync for centos 7
Thanks for the replies.
1) I always use the -n (--dry-run) option. Couldn't imaging not doing so!
2) I hate having to look up stuff like the trailing slashes each time.
And trying to decide what to (--exclude), to -H or not to -H, etc.
3) I hate having to re-do #2 every time I want to do a small ad-hoc backup
or synchronization, let alone a full filesystem backup.
4) I could do shut
2012 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] inttoptr and basicaa
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Arnold Schwaighofer
> Subject: [LLVMdev] inttoptr and basicaa
> BasicAA treats it conservatively if used on its own. It will return mayalias
> for the two pointers.
> TBAA operates based on the guarantee that pointers to different types cannot
> alias (think C's strict
2015 Feb 11
1
[OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Gordon Messmer
<gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 09:02 AM, Francis Gerund wrote:
>>
>> When using rsync to backup and restore, when should and when should one
>> *not* include hard links (by using the -H option switch)?
>
>
> It's probably too site or application specific to give any general advice.
>
2015 Apr 07
2
Informes periódicos con R
Hola, Jorge
Lo he mirado y parece que es una opción bastante buena, pero no logro saber
cómo se salva en Word, solo lo logro en html
Muchas gracias
Jesús
De: Jorge I Velez [mailto:jorgeivanvelez en gmail.com]
Enviado el: martes, 07 de abril de 2015 11:40
Para: Jesus Herranz
CC: R-help-es
Asunto: Re: [R-es] Informes periódicos con R
Hola Jesus,
Una forma es RStudio + Markdown.
2015 Apr 07
0
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
On 04/04/2015 11:24 AM, Francis Gerund wrote:
> Is there a way in Centos 7 to boot into an alternate video setup?
>
> Some distributions have an option to boot into something called VESA (or
> something similar). Something that might not have the fanciest features,
> but more likely to at least just work.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Francis Gerund <ranrund at
2015 Feb 11
5
[OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
Hello.
After some reading, including the rsync man page, I am still not clear on
this:
When using rsync to backup and restore, when should and when should one
*not*
include hard links (by using the -H option switch)?
A simple example case would be backups for one or just a few light-duty
local workstations. Is there a simple, clear rule about that, or is it too
complicated for that?
2015 Apr 07
2
Informes periódicos con R
Hola Jorge
Perdona que sea tan pesado, pero no encuentro el fichero docx. Tampoco me
manejo muy bien con RStudio.
He insertado lo que me has dicho; pero solo tengo en la pantalla la opción
“Knit HTML” y siempre me genera un HTML.
He instalado “pander” pero no obtengo el docx
Gracias
Jesús
De: Jorge I Velez [mailto:jorgeivanvelez en gmail.com]
Enviado el: martes, 07 de abril de 2015
2015 Apr 04
0
video problem since 2015-04-01 update
Updated the kernel as suggested to 3.19, did not solve problem.
Unbelievable! Oh, well . . .
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Francis Gerund <ranrund at gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, thanks to all who took the time to reply.
>
> What a shame; I hadn't planned on spending Easter weekend learning to do
> kernel upgrades, but . . . here it goes.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr
2015 Apr 04
11
The future of centos
Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along,
nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to
read this.
Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's
plans for the future of Centos.
Can you read between the lines? In this case, it isn't very hard to do,
IMHO.
community.redhat.com/centos-faq