similar to: Something like apt-cacher for CentOS/RHEL?

Dnia sobota, 7 marca 2015 12:16:14 AM John R Pierce pisze: > I maintain a local mirror of the centos repository with a simple lftp > script, and configure my clients to get updates from this mirror via > the /etc/yum.repos.d files.... And why not rsync? -- Over And Out MoonWolf

On 3/6/2015 10:51 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > For some time I've fiddled with Debian and Ubuntu LTS. There's one > really nice feature for local networks: apt-cacher, a package proxy > for APT. > > My company is in the remote South French countryside, and more often > than not, schools and public libraries only have some very limited > Internet access with

Hello! I need to download updates and install it on several servers. I don't want to mirror all packages just because traffic is expensive here. We use apt-cacher as specialized proxy for our ubuntu desktops, so we download packages only once. Is there similar tool for yum?

Hi All, Is there something similar to apt-cacher available for CentOS? I would like to ensure that an application is only downloaded once to the network and not hundreds of times. If there isn't an equivalent, would someone please point me in the direction of how I might accomplish this with CentOS? -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University -

Hi All, Is there something similar to apt-cacher available for CentOS? I would like to ensure that an application is only downloaded once to the network and not hundreds of times. If there isn't an equivalent, would someone please point me in the direction of how I might accomplish this with CentOS? -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University -

I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are from February and appear to be the most recent based on the mirrors, but every mirror I hit I see no

Hi all, I was wondering if would be possible to configure squid to co ope with yum so it recognize mirrors and it can cache rpm packages based on package name and maybe some other parameter to be sure that is the right package. Any ideas? Cheers, Lorenzo

Hi, I just started getting errors from APT: W: GPG error: http://apt.puppetlabs.com squeeze Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1054B7A24BD6EC30 Puppet Labs Release Key (Puppet Labs Release Key) <info@puppetlabs.com> It looks like they keyring was changed yesterday on the APT repository: keyring.gpg 09-Jan-2013 14:51 2.5K However, I''ve yet to see an

I am wanting to set up a local mirror of apt.puppetlabs.com, and am a bit confused by the layout as well as the announcement that was made in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/0786824ea9531fe3/f53c9006843ab8dc I''m not sure exactly what I should be pulling, as rsync://apt.puppetlabs.com/packages/apt gets everything, but it seems like a bit of a

On 3/27/2015 1:27 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> oh. is /7/ supposed to be a symlink to /7.0.1406/ or a separate >> >directory ? it appears my mirroring of the mirror may be broken if >> >its supposed to be a symlink. >> > >> >in /7.0.1406/, I'm seeing files up to Feb 22. > /7/ is a link to the latest release, which at this point in timeis 7.0.1406.

The 'cacher' package contains a set of routines for caching statistical analyses. The idea is that an analysis stored in a file (say, 'foo.R') is run and the results of the evaluated expressions are cached in a database. These cached results can subsequently be packaged up and distributed over the interweb. I've just uploaded to CRAN version 0.1-2 of the 'cacher'

The 'cacher' package contains a set of routines for caching statistical analyses. The idea is that an analysis stored in a file (say, 'foo.R') is run and the results of the evaluated expressions are cached in a database. These cached results can subsequently be packaged up and distributed over the interweb. I've just uploaded to CRAN version 0.1-2 of the 'cacher'

On 3/27/2015 12:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/27/2015 12:30 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >> I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the >> CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit >> 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no >> difference. I >> have noticed that I do have some updated

Hello, we have one puppet server managing approx servers, all FreeBSD. The problem is that the puppet clients all hangs, one by one, eventually. They will run for anything between an hour up to a week. But eventually the all hang. We really like puppet and want to keep using it. But the way it is now is completely unusable. We''ve tried many versions, from 24.x, and now 2.6.1rc1. But

I need another Sipura 3K and the replacement I think is Linksys SPA3102. Any input on how reliable is it? -- #Joseph GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7

Hello everybody, I am writing on that mailing list because I have an issue using lftp and I would love to have more infos about features available on the LFTP version provided by CentOS 6. I try to connect to a ftp server in secured mode using FTPS explicit and I would love to use TLSv1.2. After several tries, I understood that the TLS negociation was not possible using TLSv1.2 (It works only

i've maintained a local centos repository at work using rsync, but it seems the corp honchos have decided to block rsync at our firewall, plus its never been 100% reliable, I'd get aborts on protocol errors sometimes several times before pulling down a complete new distro update. i'm trying to figure out how to do this with lftp, and its got me somewhat stymied. I'm testing

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:13:31PM +0100, Tom Grace wrote: > On 02/08/2016 12:11, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > > So my question is : Can lftp provided by CentOS (of course last version in the > > 6.x branch), do TLSv1.2 connection ? > It may not be related, but in the past I have needed to rebuild libNSS > and Curl in CentOS 6 due to an upstream patch the explicitly disabled

Hello again! I have this piece od code: ##################### #lftp will make the backup lftp -u user,password -e "mirror --reverse --delete --only-newer --verbose /var/bkp /test_bkp" somehost.com >> $LOGFILE # end log file date >> $LOGFILE echo "Backup Completo!" >> $LOGFILE ##################### Everything is fine, but the bash scrip dosn't complete

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:29:07PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:56:26PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > So the question is: Is that behaviour can be considered as an lftp bug or not ? Hello again, Just answering to myself and the list for a conclusion. lftp in CentOS uses the default priority provided by gnutls and it's not possible to override it in