similar to: Glibc sources?

> > I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with > > gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for > > the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want to equip > > gethostbyname() with additional code. > > Do you plan on shipping this updated glibc

On 02/27/2015 12:49 PM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > All, > > Please excuse any ignorance in this e-mail as I am not a RH/CentOS/Fedora user and may > blunder my way through the correct terminology for my request. No problem. > I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with > gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected

On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Saw this on the Exim List:- >> > <SNIP> >> >> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? >> > > upstream references: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html When I read this I read that it is fixed in

Saw this on the Exim List:- From: Tony Finch <dot--at-- at dotat.at> Subject: [exim] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname remotely exploitable via exim Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:33:45 +0000 "The Exim mail server is exploitable remotely if configured to perform extra security checks on the HELO and EHLO commands ("helo_verify_hosts" or "helo_try_verify_hosts"

On 03/02/2015 11:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: >>>> I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with >>>> gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for >>>> the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I

Hi, Two doubts. 1. What I've to replace in "NEEDED"? or I need to just run the whole command you given 2. You mean this one, rpm -qa | grep libguestfs* On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:55PM +0530, Thirumalai Nambi wrote: > > Thanks for your update, > > > > I got the

libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64 patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64 bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64 cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64 ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64 libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64

On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: >>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >>>> >>>> Saw this on the Exim List:- >>>> >>> <SNIP> >>>> >>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 -

Hi, I've launched a "yum upgrade" command on a CentOS6 laptop which has updated nearly 600 packages. Automatic updates were not working because of a conflict on a package. So the laptop is now uptodate but the camera did not works after this. The message is: kernel: uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) UVC control 6 on unit 2: -110 (exp. 2). The camera is detected as USB,

Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment: https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 & https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592 On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: > >> >

> Okay, thanks. I really don't need _EXACT_ match, but close. Again, my > aim is to equip GlibC with some logging facilities IF anyone is using the > gethostbyname(). Given the help from this list, I was able to rebuild > GlibC for CentOS and am testing my stuff now. > > I appreciate your help on this matter. Not knowing where the knobs are was > the hardest part. I

On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: >> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>> Saw this on the Exim List:- >>> >> <SNIP> >>> >>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ? >>> >> >> upstream references:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0092 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0f0554770d7a565500adf20a0d403376de57f111118c04fed003266e2405598a glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.i686.rpm

<snip> > > > The list of packages that were in the "mock build root" for our build of > the glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.x86_64.src.rpm is here: > > http://ur1.ca/ju24m > > To get close to an exact match, you need to use mock and use the > packages listed above (and only those versions) if you are trying to get > a build that matches what we built.

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0016 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0016.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 24e8a54841d2f60b571da54c41c8b5e90713c920aa6b8d5fea15f4c59028393d glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On 07/05/2018 06:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/04/2018 06:35 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 16:06 -0400, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Where can I find the srpm for >>>> centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? >>>>

Update me Richie, Meanwhile, I've booted the server in latest kernel, Its still not working for me. 2015-03-17 0:54 GMT+05:30 Thirumalai Nambi <thirumalai.sandy@gmail.com>: > > libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 > upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 > atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch > plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi, the IETF drafts had to be removed from the Debian package recently because IETF RFCs/drafts are (per default) not conformant to the Debian Free Software Guidelines, see <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390665>. It would be nice if Phil and Luca could dual-license the drafts under a DFSG-free license also ... most straight-forward would be libtheora's own