similar to: CentOS 7, systemd and firewall-cmd

Chris Murphy wrote: > firewall-cmd --add-service=rsyncd > firewall-cmd --add-service=rsyncd Error: INVALID_SERVICE: rsyncd Is there another place that there needs to be an rsyncd service file, whatever it's supposed to be named, *other* than where systemd wants it? mark > To make it permanent, do the above and this: > firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=rsyncd > >

On 4/28/2020 4:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<name>? I wonder if you > have IPv6 disabled. Pasted below. V6 definitely works. I have a second server and gave it a WAN address and I can connect between them using their WAN addresses. That's what told me that my ip6tables weren't screwed up and that the problem lay elsewhere.

On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 16:33 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: > > firewall-cmd --add-service=rsyncd > > > firewall-cmd --add-service=rsyncd > Error: INVALID_SERVICE: rsyncd > > Is there another place that there needs to be an rsyncd service file, > whatever it's supposed to be named, *other* than where systemd wants it? > > mark

Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm on Fedora 22 Server which has this already: > > # cat /usr/lib/firewalld/services/rsyncd.xml > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <service> > <short>Rsync in daemon mode</short> > <description>Rsync in daemon mode works as a central server, in > order to house centralized files and

firewall-cmd --add-service=rsyncd To make it permanent, do the above and this: firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=rsyncd Chris Murphy

I'm on Fedora 22 Server which has this already: # cat /usr/lib/firewalld/services/rsyncd.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <service> <short>Rsync in daemon mode</short> <description>Rsync in daemon mode works as a central server, in order to house centralized files and keep them synchronized.</description> <port

Since RHV 3.6.10, the default network name is 'ovirtmgmt' instead of 'rhvm'. This is just a documentation change. --- p2v/virt-p2v.pod | 10 +++++----- v2v/cmdline.ml | 2 +- v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 12 ++++++------ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/p2v/virt-p2v.pod b/p2v/virt-p2v.pod index ea685be..4a5f587 100644 --- a/p2v/virt-p2v.pod +++

Hello, I have a server pfsense in bridge mode to function as transparent FW, the problem is that once I connect the pfsense between my router core and my core switch catalyst a few seconds begin to appear several messages like these: em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting And the connection falls

Hello All, I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content. When the

Hello, I?m trying to configure a CentOS 7 server to act as a host for a bunch of virtual servers (KVM). I have an 802.3ad bonded Ethernet connected to the server with a bunch of tagged VLANs. I want to be able to build a bridge interface on the server for each VLAN and then attach that to the bond interface and the virtual clients. I also want to attach a host interface to one of the VLANs

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 > of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried > to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a > gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. > > I'm not seeing any

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

CentOS 6.2......... Why do the physical interfaces report (correctly) that they're negotiated at 1000Mb/s, but when I `cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0` I get 100Mbps for the member interfaces, and when I ` mii-tool bond0` I get 10Mbps for the bond? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ethtool em1 Settings for em1: Supported ports: [

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for

hi everyone I'm having a bit of a puzzle on one centos system, I have four interfaces: nm-team1 10.5.6.100 em1 192.168.2.17 em2 192.168.2.18 p3p3 172.25.12.222 I do: ping 10.5.6.17 -I em1 PING 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17) from 192.168.2.17 em1: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.5.6.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.367 ms the same for -I em2, for -I em1 and naturally for -I nm-team1 - all good.

On 08/27/2015 03:29 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 05:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening >> services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: >> >> dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos >> >> Here is the list of services: >> >> RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula

Okay, so I''m trying to setup my multiple ISP setup that I described earlier. I have: # ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

On 27/08/15 05:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening > services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: > > dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos > > Here is the list of services: > > RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula bacula-client dhcp dhcpv6 > dhcpv6-client dns > ftp high-availability http

On 27/08/15 10:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 08/27/2015 03:29 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 27/08/15 05:20, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening >>> services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: >>> >>> dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos >>> >>>