similar to: Centos 6 Sendmail backup MX Config

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects > > Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, > still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come > through backup MX. This is due to the same reason why greylisting is >

On Fri, February 13, 2015 12:18 pm, Ken Smith wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >>> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >>> still what is killed by greylisting by

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I stated pure observation on at least two pairs of primary - backup MX I > maintain. Still I made backup MXes with greylisting as well (they are > separately hit by same bad spammers scripts, at a rate about 10 times > smaller than primary MXes are and absolutely independently). I think

On Fri, February 13, 2015 10:57, Ken Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is > correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. > > If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for > domain > bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a > > Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY > >

Hi All, I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY statement into /etc/mail/access and restart sendmail Obviously I have the DNS MX records for the domain are

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:02:03PM +0800, Plutocrat wrote: > On 11/06/2020 16.26, Marc Roos wrote: > > I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot > > is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email > > headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. > > You can configure this sort of thing in postfix, exim etc. The

hello, a vm in format qcow2 on host A (Intel Xeon CPU E5-1650 v4) do not start on host B ( Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz ) i get on host B by starting the vm "trap errors" Opcode. anyone here has an idea how to solve this? kind regards marko -- zbfmail - Mittendrin statt nur Datei! OpenDKIM, SPF, DSPAM, Greylisting, POSTSCREEN, AMAVIS, Mailgateways Mailfiltering, SMTP

Hi List, i installed qemu-agent on a windows server and it is working as expected. I can send via virsh commands. I already performed successful an online backup of an windows server. Now my question is, is it possible to execute commands on the windows server via qemu-agent? I want to shutdown the MSSQL Service before doing backups. Is that possible? i dont find any helpful pages in net.

Hello, i´ve done 2 vm with qcow2 disks and created them with qemu-img with prealloc=metadata. Virt-Manager shows me under the performance settings for the Storage, Cache= Hypervisor Default IO= Hypervisor Default Is this the best setting? Or do i choose "native" IO on prealloc=metadata created disks? And do i have to change Cache too? The Virtualisation Host is gento linux, the

This might be related to the configuration of the virtual machine. A machine configured to have cpu X might not start up when it is changed to cpu Y. We also observed that a windows host does not boot on a ubuntu host with the default kvm configuration.

On 11/06/2020 16.26, Marc Roos wrote: > I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot > is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email > headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. You can configure this sort of thing in postfix, exim etc. The part of the mail system to do with RECEIVING emails. Not really a dovecot function. Look

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Whats a good antispam solution? I am using sendmail and dovecot 1.1. I came across dovecot's antispam plugin, but it seems it does not support 1.1 yet. I am also looking for something non-perl based. I am already doing some greylisting with sendmail milter. Any other good suggestions? If not, I guess I might have to downgrade back to 1.0 dovecot. Thanks

hey dominik, Am 2017-08-24 18:14, schrieb Dominik Psenner: > This might be related to the configuration of the virtual machine. A > machine configured to have cpu X might not start up when it is changed > to cpu Y. We also observed that a windows host does not boot on a > ubuntu host with the default kvm configuration. >

Dear Friends Greetings, i wish to setup SPF look up f0r Postfix on CentOS 6.2. I could not find any document on the net describing the procedure. is anyone have documentation i can follow to setup the SPF please? Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> >> In this case the secondary MX has the same RBL's etc etc as the primary. >> I do see the spammers sending their junk to the secondary more than the >> primary MX. Agree the secondary does not know the difference between >> valid and invalid addresses. >

Does anyone have any experience with adding SPF support to sendmail?? Thank you, -ed-