similar to: multipathd

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz >Sent: 04 February 2015 22:44 >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] multipathd > >Am 04.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Rushton Martin: >> Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected >> with fibre channel.

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Our cluster was supplied with two IBM DS3400 RAID arrays connected with fibre channel. Both are old and one is failing so we bought an IBM V3700 to replace it. The V3700 complained that we were using the IBM's RDAC driver (true) and we were advised to change to using Linux multipath. I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor

Hello, I have IBM Storwize V3700 storage, connected to 2 IBM x3550 M4 servers via fiber channel. The servers are with QLogic ISP2532-based 8Gb Fibre Channel to PCI Express HBA cards and run Centos 5.10 When I export a volume to the servers, each of them sees the volume twice, i.e /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc, with the same size. Previously I have installed many systems with IBM DS3500 series of

Hello, suppose I want to use a special configuration for my IBM/1814 storage array luns, then I put something like this in multipath.conf devices { device { vendor "IBM" product "^1814" product_blacklist "Universal Xport" path_grouping_policy "group_by_prio" path_checker

Hi all. While playing with iSCSI Enterprise Target + multipathd on CentOS 5.1 (both the target and the initiator/multipath/xen box are Cent 5.1), I encountered a strange fault condition that leads to a kernel panic in a version of Xen 3.2.1-rc2 pulled from a couple of days ago. My lab consists of two Clovertown machines with dual GigE into separate switches. The target box is softraid5

The reason for the behaviour observed below turned out to be that the device entry in /etc/multipath.conf was inadvertently appended *after* the devices section , rather than inside it - so that we had #devices { # device { # blah blah # } (file has a bunch of defaults commented out) # etc #} # # device { our settings } *rather than*

hi all We have a rh linux server connected to two HP SAN controllers, one an HSV200 (on the way out), the other an HSV400 (on the way in). (Via a Qlogic HBA). /etc/multipath.conf contains this : device { vendor "(COMPAQ|HP)" product "HSV1[01]1|HSV2[01]0|HSV300|HSV4[05]0" getuid_callout "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u -s /block/%n"

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in

Hi all, I have a Dell server running cent 5.6, new install, connecting to an IBM DS3500. I have configured iscsi connections using iscsid and can log into the targets on the IBM. I can also mount the LUNs when accessing them from their active controller path. When I throw multipath into the mix, it fails completely. Multipath is working, when I run multipath -ll it shows me the correct active

Yep, that's what I do at home. The trouble for off-net machines is the download time - over 24 hours for CentOS 7 + epel, and then copy over. If you don't grab everything, the one package you miss is the one that stops the update. :-( >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of John R Pierce >Sent: 04