similar to: Kickstarting several *different* setups

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Kickstarting several *different* setups"

2012 Jan 21
1
Trying to understand how mcollective differs from saltstack?
http://saltstack.org/ http://puppetlabs.com/mcollective/ I found this link that talks about Func, Rundeck, Salt and mcollective, but it doesn''t really compare and contrast. http://www.coloandcloud.com/editorial/func-mcollective-salt-and-rundeck/(From a 10,000 overview Saltstack and mcollective look very similar. IE: both integrate with facter/puppet, have queuing mechanisms, allow remote
2015 Jun 05
2
Effectiveness of CentOS vm.swappiness
Am 05.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 06/05/2015 03:29 AM, Markus "Shorty" Uckelmann wrote: >> some (probably unused) parts are swapped out. But, some of >> those parts are the salt-minion, php-fpm or mysqld. All services which >> are important for us and which suffer badly from being swapped out. > > Those two things can't really both be
2015 Jan 20
2
Kickstarting several *different* setups
On 01/20/2015 08:41 AM, Tom Grace wrote: > I would suggest that the "right way" would be to kickstart all your > machines the same way, and then use a configuration management tool > (like Puppet or Chef) to customize them Seconded. Personally, I recommend either ansible or bcfg2 over other tools. Puppet has a larger user base, but when I talk to users at conferences (such
2015 Jun 05
6
Effectiveness of CentOS vm.swappiness
Am 05.06.2015 um 00:23 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > If I'd have to venture a guess then I'd say there are memory pages that > are never touched by any processes and as a result the algorithm has > decided that it's more effective to swap out these pages to disk and use > the freed ram for the page-cache. That's my guess too. [...] > impact. If however these
2015 Jan 20
0
Kickstarting several *different* setups
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would suggest that the "right way" would be to kickstart all your >> machines the same way, and then use a configuration management tool >> (like Puppet or Chef) to customize them > > > Seconded. > > Personally, I recommend either ansible or bcfg2 over
2015 Jan 21
1
Kickstarting several *different* setups
Ansible, Bcfg2, Chef, Cobbler, Puppet, and Salt; I notice that Spacewalk is not mentioned. Any particular reason that it gets no recommendations? What about CFEngine? Any comments on this one? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive
2015 Jun 05
2
Effectiveness of CentOS vm.swappiness
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:33:11AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/05/2015 03:29 AM, Markus "Shorty" Uckelmann wrote: > >some (probably unused) parts are swapped out. But, some of > >those parts are the salt-minion, php-fpm or mysqld. All services which > >are important for us and which suffer badly from being swapped out. > > Those two things can't
2023 Nov 16
1
WInbind hang?
I've had that happen in the past with non-RedHat linux boxes. Fortunately we have Saltstack on all the boxes and can just salt '*' cmd.run 'killall -SIGKILL winbindd; service winbind restart' But it hangs SSH sessions and things like 'ls -lha' that need to resolve usernames and groups. i.e. if you removed winbind from /etc/nsswitch.conf it would stop happening. The
2020 Jun 14
3
Question about certificates on Samba AD/DC
Hi everyone, I have a question about certificates generated on Samba AD/DC deployment. After all server configuration, I notice that there are ca.pem, cert.pem and key.pem on /usr/local/samba/private/tls directory. I realize the ca.pem and cert.pem have 2 years validity. Will Samba AD/DC generate automatically new certs before this time over? Or, must I have to generate them manually? -- Igor
2015 Dec 05
6
Dovecot cluster using GlusterFS
Hello, I have recently setup mailserver solution using 2-node master-master setup (mainly based on MySQL M-M replication and GlusterFS with 2 replica volume) on Ubuntu 14.04 (Dovecot 2.2.9). Unfortunately even with shared-storage-aware setting: mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_fsync = always mmap_disable = yes ..I have hit strange issues pretty soon especially when user was
2008 Dec 05
0
applying a function several times
I am sorry. I am not sure if the mail a send before to this list was rejected because of header (subject). I've changed it. The first maybe was not appropriate. I did a function (sec_conop) whose arguments are syndic, well and wellconop. sec_conop(syndic='01syndic.txt',well='well-1.csv',wellconop='well-1.dat');closeAllConnections() This function takes “well” and
2015 Jun 06
1
Effectiveness of CentOS vm.swappiness
Am 05.06.2015 um 23:32 schrieb Gordon Messmer: >>> Those two things can't really both be true. If the pages >>> swapped out are unused, then the application won't suffer as a >>> result. >> >> Why not? If you have an application which sees action only every >> 12 to 24 hours,I think this can happen. > > Well, that's not
2015 Jun 05
0
Effectiveness of CentOS vm.swappiness
On 06/05/2015 12:09 PM, Markus "Shorty" Uckelmann wrote: > Am 05.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Gordon Messmer: >> On 06/05/2015 03:29 AM, Markus "Shorty" Uckelmann wrote: >>> some (probably unused) parts are swapped out. But, some of >>> those parts are the salt-minion, php-fpm or mysqld. All services which >>> are important for us and which
2015 Dec 07
0
Dovecot cluster using GlusterFS
We ran a load test using glusterfs and were able to deliver mail (I can't remember specifically how much per second, maybe 100 messages per second?) without any issues. We did use the glusterfs fuse client and not nfs, and used regular maildir. We developed a mail bot cluster that would deliver mail, and simultaneously receive and delete it with pop and IMAP and we ran into zero issues. We
2016 May 12
8
Suggestions for Config Management Tool
Hi, we see a growing need for a better Configuration management for our servers. Are there any known good resources for a comparison of e.g. Puppet, Chef, Ansible etc? What would you suggest and why? :) Thanks and Regards . G?tz
2015 Jan 20
0
Kickstarting several *different* setups
On 20/01/2015 16:29, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > So my question is, is there some way do determine via kickstart, what to > install on that machine based on some criteria, possibly the IP that's > being assigned to it, or MAC address, or something ... If you just want to use kickstart, it would be pretty simple to serve these via HTTP, and have a simple script in PHP or similar that
2015 Jan 20
0
Kickstarting several *different* setups
Tom: Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look into those tools. Mark: Yes, they are using pxeboot. Right now when they boot up, the pxe config offers two options, 32- and 64bit. Are you suggesting I create multiple entries that one selects based on what the machine is going to be? Is there a way to have this done automatically so I don't have to physically have to do that for each machine,
2015 Jan 20
0
Kickstarting several *different* setups
Gotcha. Thanks all! You guys gave me the answers I needed to know and hear. For the immediate futre I will likely go with multiple pxeboot options which then picks the specific kickstart file. It's easy for me to put a label on the server that says 'web' or 'mail' etc. Then just pick the same from the menu. Eventually I'll delve deeper into custom and automated setups. On
2014 Dec 13
3
CentOS forum search link in http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories under Atomic Repo
[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2015 Jan 20
3
Kickstarting several *different* setups
I'm currently using kickstart for installing new servers and have run into the following scenario: all the machines will have the same basic setup of packages, however they will each be configured for a specific task. For example, some will be mail-serving machines and won't need things like a web or mySQL server installed. Others will be web servers and do need those packages. So my