similar to: [OT] MS-Windows question - user has remapped function keys.

CentOS-6.5 We have a KVM guest running MS-WinV7pro. This guest is joined to an Active Directory Domain. That domain provides DHCP to the members. The KVM guest does not obtain its IP from the domain but from the local host's qemu hypervisor instead. Is there anyway to get around this and have the guest MS-Win OS get its DHCP from the same place as the rest of the domain members? -- ***

CentOS-6.5 We have a KVM guest running MS-WinV7pro. This guest is joined to an Active Directory Domain. That domain provides DHCP to the members. The KVM guest does not obtain its IP from the domain but from the local host's qemu hypervisor instead. Is there anyway to get around this and have the guest MS-Win OS get its DHCP from the same place as the rest of the domain members? -- ***

On Thu, June 16, 2016 14:23, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 1:09 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >> I doubt that most users check the dates on SSL certificates, >> unless they are familiar enough with TLS to understand that >> a shorter validity period is better for security. > > Oh, this is what he meant: Cert validity period. Though I agree >

Arch = x86_64 OS = CentOS-6.3 (FreePBX) Asterisk = 11.3.0 (FreePBX) Hylafax+ = 5.5.3 (epel) I am installing an Asterisk server with the intent of having it act as our fax server. The Asterisk system was installed using the current FreePBX distro which is reputedly based on CentOS-6.3. I have installed Hylafax+ from epel and I have built and packaged IAXModem-1.2.0 for CentOS-6 using mock and

On Fri, June 17, 2016 10:19 am, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 14:23, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, June 16, 2016 1:09 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> >>> I doubt that most users check the dates on SSL certificates, >>> unless they are familiar enough with TLS to understand that >>> a shorter validity period is better for

On Mon, June 23, 2014 00:29, Arun Khan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Dusty Mabe <dustymabe at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/19/2014 04:01 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: The root cause of the original problem was a change in the behaviour of libvirt (and the GUI of virt-manager) when creating new vms. The host system was already bridged and had other vms previously

CentOS-6.5 i86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4 MS-Windows v7proSP1 We have installed a MicroSoft Win7 system as a guest and have joined it to our MS AD domain. The system runs and has internet access. However, the IPv4 address it obtains and the gateway it is assigned are both sourced from the virtual machine host system and not from our AD DC DHCP server. To clarify, the virbr0 IP address

A short time ago a message on this list referred to an OSS project called ledgersmb. I am having a deal of difficulty getting this installed and as the web page at www.ledgersmb.org yields a "page not found" error and the ledger-smb-users mailing list seems very lightly used I wonder if someone here could help me out? I have ploughed through all of the perl dependencies for ledgersmb

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca

I am testing DC administration using samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD-12.1p6 and have run across this: [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# samba-tool domain join BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA DC -U"BROCKLEY\administrator" INFO 2020-06-25 14:26:10,692 pid:47306 /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/samba/join.py #104: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA' INFO 2020-06-25

This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup

Respecting cloning vm guests, I see in /etc/ssh the following: ssh_host_dsa_key ssh_host_dsa_key.pub ssh_host_key ssh_host_key.pub ssh_host_rsa_key ssh_host_rsa_key.pub Is there a simple script somewhere to regenerate all the server host keys for the new guest after cloning? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at

Respecting cloning vm guests, I see in /etc/ssh the following: ssh_host_dsa_key ssh_host_dsa_key.pub ssh_host_key ssh_host_key.pub ssh_host_rsa_key ssh_host_rsa_key.pub Is there a simple script somewhere to regenerate all the server host keys for the new guest after cloning? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at

> Could be because you added the wrong line to your smb4.conf (why does > freebsd call it smb4.conf ?), Why does freebsd put these things in /usr/local/etc/? Some questions have answers that are not worth the effort to know. > try: > nsupdate command = /usr/local/sbin/nsupdate -g I did catch that error earlier. But it makes no difference. samba_dnsupdate does not give any

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I have introduced some error in my dns resolution and I would like some help fixing it as I cannot seem to detect what I have done wrong. Briefly the setup is this: name servers: DNS01 - 216.185.71.33 DNS02 - 209.47.176.33 DNS03 - 216.185.71.34 DNS04 - 209.47.176.34 - offline DNS01 is a master DNS02-04 are slaves of 216.185.71.33 All are listed as authoritative for the zone test.com The

On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: > I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca: > > samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca > ALL -U administrator > Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: > Name=, Records=6, Children=0 > SOA: serial=7, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, >

I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca: samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=6, Children=0 SOA: serial=7, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=support.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600)

CentOS-6.5 (FreePBX-2.6) Asterisk-11.14.2 (FreePBX) snom870-SIP 8.7.3.25.5 I am having a very difficult time attempting to get TLS and SRTP working with Asterisk and anything else. At the moment I am trying to get TLS functioning with our Snom870 desk-sets. And I am not having much luck. Since this is an extraordinarily (to me) Byzantine environemnt I am going to ask if any of you have gotten

[root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca brockley.harte-lyne.ca ALL -U administrator Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=3, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=3600, ns=SMB4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca., email=hostmaster.brockley.harte-lyne.ca. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) NS: