similar to: additional network config

Am 04.01.2015 um 19:32 schrieb ken <gebser at mousecar.com>: > A system whose network routing table looks like this (abbreviated): > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 >

Hello, I am having enormous difficulty in getting samba to work correctly on the local network when the local network is on eth1. I have never had any trouble with samba when I used eth0... Here is my routing table... Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1

Hi All I have two hosts. Host A and Host B Host A routing table ------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.29.110.0 172.29.109.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 172.29.109.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0

Me and my son are running Tinc over 5 nodes, 3 of them got public address and we using them as server. Each node has its own Lan subnet 192.168.0.0/24. Originally we ran network on Openwrt routers with Tinc many years without any problem, but due to limited RAM on routes and change of one router to not Openwrt supported model, we decided to transfer Tinc installation on Raspberry Pi-s in LAN. In

Hi, I am trying to fix a problem I have for about a week now. The environment is: --several independent servers with Centos5.4 on the latest patchlevel (example will be server2) All of them are working properly. --a machine with Xen installed to host some virtual machines (xenserver1) --domu servers on xenserver1 (crmserver1, winserver1) The whole network is connected with a Lancom router to a

In /etc/shorewall/masq I have: eth0 eth1 eth0 vmnet1 eth0 vmnet8 ------------- eth0 is my default route to the Linksys router connected to the cable modem. eth1 is my connection to 192.168.1 subnet and it is the gateway for all other machines on this subnet. My routing table is: # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination

Weird behaviour. A couple of days ago I installed another DSL router. During the process I have somehow caused the default gw route to disappear - on system start up the interface comes up fine, I can see and connect to the local subnet but not to the internet. [rkampen at timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref

I have 2 machines running centos. each machine has 2 network cards. Box 1: eth1: T1 connection 74.X.X.X eth0: office connection 192.X.X.X Box 2: eth1: Cable modem 24.X.X.X eth0: office connection 192.X.X.X How do I issue a route command on each box so it will use eth0 as the shortest route between the two boxes??? Thanks, Jerry -------------------- On Box1 the route is: [root at mndemo ~]#

Hi. I've an asterisk box with 2 nics, one with a local ip 192.168.1.xxx and the other with a public ip. The default route is via the public ip route. I need to use sip on both ends, since I have phones on the lan and on the internet... but.. if I set bindaddr=0.0.0.0 in sip.conf, I had that error messages: Jun 19 13:07:21 WARNING[7176]: File chan_sip.c, Line 386 (__sip_xmit): sip_xmit of

Lastest Modifications: HOST A: Removed 2 route add as you suggested, and it's still working. HOST B: This host has a openwrt as gateway and I added few days ago as you suggested on freenode and this is HOST B Gateway route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 10 0

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

Hi, I'm building a firewall/router on Centos. I'm using Shorewall but have currently stopped and cleared the firewall rules to isolate the routing problem. My firewall box has 5 interfaces in it but currently only two are involved in the problem. eth1: inet addr:192.168.1.224 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth3: inet addr:192.168.202.1 Bcast:192.168.202.255

Hey Tom, This is my T-1 slash 27 network btw. How does this look??? for---- net eth0 66.224.62.120 ----dmz eth1 66.224.62.120 This box is for practice Dmz we talked about. with the pratice Dmz server''s Ip 66.224.62.121 routing and interface''s below [root@66-224-62-120 root]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr

My current route for a box shows this: route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2 74.223.8.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0

Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"), the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route to

OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on it :( ) The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My problem is teql can''t

Hey gang, I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1. I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table: [root@asterisk root]# route

Hello list, We have KVM setup using libvirt (0.9.0) as configuration device on a Debian Squeeze Host. Networking is done in routed bridge mode and we have two different subnets, as well as one main ip. Subnets get routed to the main ip (this is done by our provider). Network on hosts are done like this: <network> <name>subnet_1</name>

Okay, here''s the deal, (diagram below) I currently have 3 NIC''s configured in my Linux server. eth0 serving the home network eth2 Cable modem to internet ppp0 ADSL to internet (through eth1) Connections can be established from eth0 (192.168.0.0/255) and from eth2 (24.250.85.128/128). Because eth2 has the first default route. However, ppp0