similar to: Design changes are done in Fedora

On Jan 1, 2015, at 2:15 PM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > On Wed, December 31, 2014 12:03, Warren Young wrote: >> >> So, cope with change. > > Is one to infer from your mantra 'cope with change' that one is not supposed > to express any opinion whatsoever, ever, on any forum No, it?s a reaction to those who apparently want nothing to

How do i upgrade my Xen guest (domu1) ? On a stand alone hardware one would insert DVD/CD/Network and perform the upgrade, What is the equivalent in Xen World ? Tahnks !!! -- Regards, mantra - Instrument of Thought _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's not necessary for either code interfaces or data structures >> to change in backward-incompatible ways. > > You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe

Folks, Following the discussion with Nico and others, I've created PR20683 to discuss about the implementation of a generic and externalised target specific parsing API for LLVM, Clang and others. I have a vague plan involving a generic class (say TargetParser) in lib/Target that is accessible as an API to any tool that needs target specific parsing. The idea is then to let targets implement

Hi, I have searched the documentations of eval, substitute, expression, and I cannot make work something like the values of a list of variable names: lis <- ls(pattern="pr") # all variables with names containing 'pr' What is the mantra giving me the _values_ of the variables whose names are contained in 'lis'. eval(parse(ls(pattern="pr"))) will not do

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Jeroen Ooms <jeroen.ooms at stat.ucla.edu> > wrote: > I'm not disagreeing with what's been said in this thread, but I can't help but recall that I brought up this exact issue probably 15 years ago and was told (by Brian, I believe)

On Dec 31, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe maintaining legacy interfaces is cost-free. >> >> Take it from a software developer: it isn?t. > > OK, but should one

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 18 June 2008 15:08:46 Edd Barrett wrote: >> Holger Schurig wrote: >> >> With 3.3.5 my first test took 5 times to produce a non "bus >> >> error" build. There were no 'make cleans' in between. >> >> >> >> What is

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > As a software developer, I think I can speak to both halves of that point. > > First, the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. Lots of free services that call everything they release

"Google: Evil or Not?" is my first Rails webapp and I''ve just made it public at http://evilornot.info Do you still believe the ?Do no evil? Google mantra? Do you think Google Book Search, the AOL deal, and Larry and Sergey?s 767 point to Google losing it?s pristine morality and turning over to the dark side? Now you can discover what the world thinks and contribute your

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >>> >>> the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing fast. >> >> Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. > > How did you jump from incremental feature roll-outs to data loss? There is no necessary connection there.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > If we express them >> here then there is a chance, a small chance but a chance nonetheless, >> that someone at RH with a view a little broader than that evidenced in >> most of the traffic on the Fedora devel list, might take notice. > > I think this essentially sums up your

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >>> I think most LLVM users on Windows are interested on X86 only. This >>> saves a lot of time on the build process and creates smaller >>>

> AFAIU, it's not OK for -g to affect code generation. I agree with the > rest of your plan. That's correct, -g must not affect code generation. This is a fundamental mantra among debug-info people. > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > > On 27 November 2013 08:43, Evgeniy Stepanov >

Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > MSVC *is* continuously checked; see > http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-i686-xp-msvc9. Anyone > who breaks the MSVC build will get a nastygram from buildbot. This is new news for me. If the developer who broke the msvc build receives a nastygram, would he urged to fix it when he has no msvc compiler and probably no

Hello all, Here is my situation: I have an existing linux box with 100+ users. This box run various services. Users do not have shell access. I have added samba to this box so users can share files and access their files from Windows. Samba installation and configuration went smoothly. Now, the problem is, I need to create entries in smbpasswd for these 100+ users. How would I go about creating

On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 09:46 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 02/13/2015 09:15 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Yeah, the old "move stuff to alternate ports" thing is largely a waste > > of time and just makes it more difficult for legitimate use. With > > large bot networks and tools like zmap, finding services on alternate > > ports is not that hard for the

Hello all. Am relatively new to RoR and I am pondering how to do something without using components since they appear to be "coda non grata". I have a standard layout that is used by all controllers. In this layout I want to list the next 5 events that are upcoming based on todays date. These events are currently stored in the Event model (created using scaffolding). Currently only

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > >> MSVC *is* continuously checked; see >> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-i686-xp-msvc9.  Anyone >> who breaks the MSVC build will get a nastygram from buildbot. > > This is new news for me. > > If the developer

Hi all, (This has been cross-posted to vorbis-dev and ogg-dev, since I thought various people on vorbis-dev may be interested in it.) I've been working with illiminable for the past few weeks to port the underlying, platform-neutral part of his DirectShow filters (oggdsf) to UNIX. While DirectShow is a Windows-specific media framework, illiminable's filters have been designed so