similar to: CentOS 6 - httpd 2.2.29

On 16/12/14 18:15, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 16.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb For at ll: >> On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For at ll wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, >>>> (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and

On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote: > On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For at ll wrote: >> Hi >> >> I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, >> (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and >> baseurl=http://mirror.fserver.ru/centos-repo/6/$basearch >> >> For now this repo is not active, any other repo have 2.2.29

>From this change (res_rtp_asterisk): ast 13.10 to 13.11 webrtc JSSIP stop working, failing with chan_sip.c:4083 retrans_pkt: Hanging up call 7238b48c11581d4166b899bf747a05f7 at 130.211.62.184:0 - no reply to our critical packet (see https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/SIP+Retransmissions). is there any way to configure to have the previous behaviour? Im trying to set

Hi Is there known advices on how to favor PFS with dovecot? In Apache, I use the following directives, with cause all modern browsers to adopt 256 bit PFS ciphers, while keeping backward compatibility with older browsers and avoiding BEAST attack: SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 SSLHonorCipherOrder On SSLCipherSuite ECDHE at STRENGTH:ECDH at STRENGTH:DH at STRENGTH:HIGH:-SSLv3-SHA1:-TLSv10

If using the standard CentOS packages is there a way to print the options that were specified when the package was built? For example # rpm -qi at Name : at Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.1.10 Vendor: CentOS Release : 44.el6_5.2 Build Date: Tue 07 Oct 2014 03:35:22 AM CDT Install Date: Fri 17 Oct

Am 16.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb For at ll: > On 15.12.2014 12:50, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For at ll wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, >>> (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and >>> baseurl=http://mirror.fserver.ru/centos-repo/6/$basearch

Hi I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and baseurl=http://mirror.fserver.ru/centos-repo/6/$basearch For now this repo is not active, any other repo have 2.2.29 rpm which I can add to my repo....

On 12/15/2014 05:51 AM, For at ll wrote: > Hi > > I had a two repo for cento6 where I can download httpd 2.2.29, > (baseurl=http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/6/$basearch/) and > baseurl=http://mirror.fserver.ru/centos-repo/6/$basearch > > For now this repo is not active, any other repo have 2.2.29 rpm which I > can add to my repo.... > > Have you tried

Hi, I want that dovecot uses PFS with my Apple Devices. I set the Cipher List to: ssl_cipher_list = DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!CBC:!PSK:!SRP:!DSS:!SSLv2:!RC4 I got this from here: http://www.kuketz-blog.de/perfect-forward-secrecy-mit-apple-mail/ But then my only Outlook 2010 Client won't connect. If i enable rsa-aes128-SHA again on third place

Hi everyone, Prompted by the fact that addressing some of the recent SSL problems actually would benefit from also changing things on how openSSL is used (not just updating the library), I started looking into some improvements. The tracking ticket is: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/2070 To sum it up: - hard disable SSLv3 - hard disable compression - new default cipher list - enable forward

Has anyone else experienced a degraded symmetric key exchange when using FF-31 vice FF24? When I use FF24 then I get a symmetric type of AES-256 (Very Strong) rating in Calomel 0.62. When I switch to FF31 and connect to exactly the same server host and url then in Calomel 0.62 I see this instead: TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (Very Weak). I am not altering any of the configuration options

Hallo, Following the tips found at https://calomel.org/nut_ups.html I was trying to make NUT operate "APC Back UPS CS-350". The device introduces itself as: #v+ ugen0 at uhub0 port 1 "American Power Conversion Back-UPS CS 350 FW:807.q7.I USB FW:q7" rev 1.10/0.06 addr 2 #v- My config: #v+ [apc] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/ugen0.00 pollfreq =

Hallo, Following the tips found at https://calomel.org/nut_ups.html I was trying to make NUT operate "APC Back UPS CS-350". The device introduces itself as: #v+ ugen0 at uhub0 port 1 "American Power Conversion Back-UPS CS 350 FW:807.q7.I USB FW:q7" rev 1.10/0.06 addr 2 #v- My config: #v+ [apc] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/ugen0.00 pollfreq =

Sounds like Comcast's manual for CALEA compliance was leaked. Pretty interesting read if you are curious: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/ Direct link (PDF): http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/docs/handbook.pdf -- Kristian Kielhofner

Hello, I'm using the docker stuff from the extras repo on CentOS 7.x ? I'm using a secured local registry, which worked fine til 1.13.1-53 ? After the upgrade, I run into following error: > docker login repo.local:5000 Error response from daemon: Get https://repo.local:5000/v1/users/: x509: certificate is not valid for any names, but wanted to match repo.local ? > curl -v

On 12/2/2014 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 02.12.2014 um 06:44 schrieb Will Yardley: >> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >>> On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote: >>>> Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config >>>> (in a way that's sane)? >>> >>>> Is there a

On 05/22/2015 04:37 AM, Vijendra Agarwal (vijagarw) wrote: > Hi All, > Currently my system is using httpd 2.2.27. As there were many Vulnerability fixes released under 2.2.29, I would like to upgrade the Apache httpd. > My system is having CentOS 6.5. > > I checked on CentOS Repos using yum but could not find the latest httpd rpm from there. So I am building the httpd rpm from the

I am interested in configuring Dovecot's TLS so as to retain forward secrecy, but eliminate all of NIST's elliptic curves. Besides being subject to side channel attacks [1], in some quarters there is a general distrust of NIST's curves and any of their other cryptographic primitives after the Dual EC DRBG debacle. >From what I can tell, the following will prevent the use of

Hi All, Currently my system is using httpd 2.2.27. As there were many Vulnerability fixes released under 2.2.29, I would like to upgrade the Apache httpd. My system is having CentOS 6.5. I checked on CentOS Repos using yum but could not find the latest httpd rpm from there. So I am building the httpd rpm from the source tar ball downloaded from apache site. I am able to build the rpm successfully

Hello, I think I've done something to my machine, but I can't seem to figure out what. I have now set up a very simple lxc setup to try and test this. Here is the XML: ~> cat vm1GPU.xml <domain type='lxc'> <name>vm1GPU</name> <memory>1020400</memory> <os> <type>exe</type> <init>/bin/sh</init>