similar to: What is the "not supported" hardware?

Today's ghostscript.x86_64 0:8.70-21.el6_8.1 update causes evince to refuse to display any postscript file. Running evince from a terminal session, I see the errors: invalidaccess -7 invalidaccess -7 invalidaccess -7 ** (evince:1252): WARNING **: Error rendering thumbnail Downgrading to ghostscript.x86_64 0:8.70-21.el6 corrects the problem. Anyone else seeing this? -- Bob Nichols

I'm still not getting the firefox-38.1.1-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm that was announced yesterday (8 August) morning. I looked at several of the mirror sites I receive, and they all have the new firefox in their Packages directory, but their repodata is all a day older (7 August), so yum doesn't see the update. Example mirror: http://mirror.cs.uwp.edu/pub/centos/6.7/updates/x86_64/ -- Bob

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Are you referring to this thread by any chance? >> >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html >> >> The upstream bugzilla referenced in there is now private but I >> provided the known

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Jeremy Hoel wrote: > > We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have > > something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel > > might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed > to > > install ok (we would also update the

On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the image and select "Save Image As...", firefox crashes. Final messages from stderr: (firefox:3401): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system [Child 3502, Chrome_ChildThread] WARNING: pipe error (3): Connection reset by peer: file

On 08/09/2015 10:21 AM, Peter Q. wrote: > On Aug 9, 2015 8:43 AM, "Robert Nichols" <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > >> I'm still not getting the firefox-38.1.1-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm >> that was announced yesterday (8 August) morning. I looked at >> several of the mirror sites I receive, and they all have the new >> firefox in their

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote: >> Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install >> of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than >> installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the >> time) fail

Which manual? This could actually be the root of the issue. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7910 On 26 May 2015 at 07:56, Jeremy Hoel <jthoel at gmail.com> wrote: > If the decision was made around the 4.8 time period to not fix the problem, > why in v6 is it still listed in the manual as being a valid option? > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Andrew Holway

Just want to verify: CentOS 5's FS utilities are too old to safely resize a *live* (mounted, etc.) root file system (and the CentOS 5 installer/rescue system does not include either resize2fs or fsadm utilities). I am presuming I will need a full-fledged Live CD/DVD to resize the root file system. This is for an old 32-bit laptop that presently has CentOS 5.11 on it -- I want to shrink

Once upon a time, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> said: > the lack of VM snapshot capability is a total deal-breaker for me. The capability is still there and works just the same as before. The only change is that the new preferred tool for graphical VM management, Cockpit, doesn't yet support making snapshots. virt-manager is still there for now (presumably until

On 09/03/2015 03:14 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Robert Nichols > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: >> I have a PCI sound card that I would like to assign to a VM, but >> when I try to do so the VM fails to start and displays this message: >> >> Error starting domain: Unable to read from monitor: Connection reset by peer [SNIP]

I have a PCI sound card that I would like to assign to a VM, but when I try to do so the VM fails to start and displays this message: Error starting domain: Unable to read from monitor: Connection reset by peer Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 44, in cb_wrapper callback(asyncjob, *args, **kwargs) File

On 08/11/2017 12:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Robert Nichols > <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: >> On 08/10/2017 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On

Where is the SRPM for kernel-2.6.18-18.el5 ? I don't find it in the SRPMS directory on the updates mirrors. -- Bob Nichols Yes, "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.

On 04/15/2016 01:05 AM, ???? wrote: > Dear Robert, > > Before sending 'grep -r /home /etc' data, I want tell you what happned this > morning. > > In order to solve the /home/home problem, 'umount /home' had been done, > system had been running in a normal file system. > But suddenly /home has been lost. > > > Key information of that time is as in

On 04/12/2016 05:37 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "????" <tadao at creative-japan.org> ?: "centos" >> <centos at centos.org> Envoy?: Mardi 12 Avril 2016 08:17:13 Objet: >> [CentOS] mount bind problem > >> I have set on fstab /home with 'mount bind' but it seems like bind >> is not

On 02/08/2016 03:05 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Wes James wrote: >> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >> >> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >> >> I saw zerofree, but I?m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on >> this version of CentOS. >> > I don't understand the point of doing this. Wes didn't say the reason he wanted to zero

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:13:17 -0500 > >> Scott Robbins wrote: > >> > You may have noticed how if Fedora, by some odd

<overly trimmed> On 02/25/2015 01:56 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Ok, so some of this now works, but I'm still having problems. With the > bootif option, the system now correctly configures and uses the same > interface to get its kickstart file. However, when the system is done and > boots up, the interfaces are still messed up. So this is what I have in the >

On 08/10/2017 11:06 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/09/2017 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> If it's a bad sector problem, you'd write to sector 17066160 and see if >> the >>> drive complies or spits back a write error. It looks like a bad sector