similar to: Intro

Hi all, I've tried researching this, and so far, have struggled to find any contemporary information on the issue, so I do apologise if asking this irritates people who have answered this before. I have managed to set up Asterisk 1.8 on the web server here. I have two softphones (Ekiga) able to communicate with it. So far so good. I'm now curious to see if I can link it with the PSTN

On 18/8/23 18:37, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> >> wrote: >> [...] >>> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >>> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). >> >> If the IP address is

Hello All, wondering if anyone knows of any reliable mirrors to download asterisk from in Australia or somewhere close to it than having to download stuff all the way from the US? Cheers, \R -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110307/54049f18/attachment.htm>

Hello all, Figured I'd repost this with an edited subject line, to attract attention of people with Debian On Sparc experience. Apologies in advance if this kind of thing is frowned upon :) [AR] hash/hash.o hash/hash_bigkey.o hash/hash_buf.o hash/hash_func.o hash/hash_log2.o hash/hash_page.o hash/ndbm.o btree/bt_close.o btree/bt_conv.o btree/bt_debug.o btree/bt_delete.o btree/bt_get.o

I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network device is being created (iwconfig does not see it, nothing else works). A few google searches later I found out that this realtek chip is not supported by the kernel and requires a driver, and that

On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause

On 19/8/23 08:00, Stuart Longland VK4MSL wrote: > Would the UserKnownHostsFile be relative to the current working > directory of the `ssh` process at the time of its call, or would it > figure out that these files are relative to > /home/me/workplace/ops/eng-ssh/bigcust-config? Nope? just tried it, at this time it's relative to whatever directory you call `ssh` from. Which if

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > Host mytarget > Hostname 172.16.1.2

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause

Thought I'd post this here, too - I emailed it to the redhat list, and that's pretty moribund, while I've seen redhatters here.... ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Bug 800181: NFSv4 on RHEL 6.2 over six times slower than 5.7 From: m.roth at 5-cent.us Date: Tue, July 10, 2012 09:54 To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion

Hi, I'm rather new to this project, having stumbled across it earlier this afternoon, so forgive me if I'm still trying to find my way around. I was in the need of an alternative to NFS that would let me spread the task of sharing my downloaded source code files across a couple of boxes, and GlusterFS looked like a great candidate, having had no luck with Coda or OpenAFS. I also want

Hi all, I noticed a bit of an odd issue with maintaining `known_hosts` when the target machine is behind a bastion using `ProxyJump` or `ProxyCommand` with host key clashes. Client for me right now is OpenSSH_9.3p1 on Gentoo Linux/AMD64. I'm a member of a team, and most of us use Ubuntu (yes, I'm a rebel). Another team who actually maintain this fleet often access the same machines

On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > [...] >> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). > > If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record > them ("CheckHostIP

Hey Seniors, Really new to R, please has anyone imported a dataset from MS office excel 2007 into R yet? It seem to be giving me hard times which I did not expect as it use to go well with the previous versions. Thanks in advance. arnoldo --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

In the past, I've just referenced Chris's CGO 2004 paper when referring to LLVM: C. Lattner and V. Adve. LLVM: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis & transformation. For sub-projects like Clang and DragonEgg, I just cite the URLs: [4] Clang. clang.llvm.org. [5] DragonEgg. dragonegg.llvm.org. I don't know of any canonical references for these. On Sun, Apr 14,

Hi everybody, Recently, I found the Lifelong Code Optimization project on the website. And I have a question here, would you please explain it for me? In the home page of the project, it is said that the Goal of the project is to enable mordern programs to be optimized at link time with all static binary code. Here I wonder, why the library code must be static, i.e. why a dynamically

On 4/14/13 3:35 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > In the past, I've just referenced Chris's CGO 2004 paper when > referring to LLVM: I second that. We at Illinois typically cite Chris's CGO paper. The bibtex is: @InProceedings{LLVM:CGO04, Author = {Chris Lattner and Vikram Adve}, Title = {{LLVM}: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis and

Hi Terry, I'm not part of that project but I'll take a stab at answering your question. Vikram Adve is probably the person to answer. The point of Lifelong Code Optimization is to continuously optimize the code during its lifetime, even while it is running. By profiling the code, it is possible to discover the program's hot spots and intensely optimize those portions of the program.

hello, I have a question about the llvm jit. Does it use the profile information generated during runtime to enhance the generated code for arm processor? according to 'LLVM: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis **<http://llvm.org/pubs/2004-01-30-CGO-LLVM.html>' it is available but can't find it in the current source code. I really appreciate any help. Thanks in

So, what is the use of the profile passes in LLVM? Also, does llvm detect hot blocks of code for recompilation? On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com> wrote: > No, the JIT does not do any profile guided optimizations for any > architecture. It just uses the static compilation components before loading > the object into memory and running its own