similar to: Wiki Access Request: AdditionalResources/Repositories

On 1 April 2017 at 07:53, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > Good morning. > > Might I please have edit access to the AdditionalResources/Repositories > page on the wiki? Account name is JohnDennison. > > Thanks! > > John Access arranged, as requested. Please check and let me know if there is any problem. Alan.

the data is : >table.8.3<-data.frame(expand.grid( marijuana=factor(c("Yes","No"),levels=c("No","Yes")), cigarette=factor(c("Yes","No"),levels=c("No","Yes")), alcohol=factor(c("Yes","No"),levels=c("No","Yes"))), count=c(911,538,44,456,3,43,2,279))

Hi. I've already spoken with Jim Perrin about this and he's fine with it; confirm with him if need be. May I please have edit rights to http://wiki.centos.org/irc to: 1) correct a typo 2) point people to the proper documentation on how to register a nick, including sasl auth and ssl via the official Freenode documentation. 3) whatever further maintenance is needed now or in the

The 'contrib' repository is mentioned on FAQ/General #13: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-92ba307b036080a16dbffa44486cde25c081fcca but not on the AdditionalResources/Repositories page: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

I would like to be given sufficient access to http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to validate my changes. I have yet to work with the RPM Package Manager, so I will be making edits that need to be reviewed

I see this commit: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:42:14 From: noreply at centos.org To: noreply at centos.org Subject: centos wiki] Update of AdditionalResources/Repositories by PhilSchaffner The following page has been changed by PhilSchaffner: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=diff&rev2=96&rev1=95 The comment on

SerNet has en pages on their site: http://www.SerNet.de/en/samba/ Since I am maintaining the base (en) page page of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories shouldn't the en SerNet home page be the reference in the SerNet paragraph? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. > If

Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of >

On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 |

On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote: > KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with > discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel > having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing > problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no > indication that they're really

On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to be given sufficient access to > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the > raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. > > I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by > anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to

Oops, I copied the page with the acl of the original page, which, of course, means I can't edit it. Lesson learned, I hope. Could you please fix the acl so I may proceed with my edit? Sorry to be such a bother. I'm more used to working on Wikimedia wiki's. My MoinMoin skills are rusty. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >

GhettoForge seems to be using new software for their wiki. http://GhettoForge.org/ redirects to http://GhettoForge.org/index.php/Main_Page which is probably adequate. http://GhettoForge.org/wiki/Usage returns a 404. It appears http://GhettoForge.org/index.php/Usage is the replacement. I will make the appropriate change in my copy of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories. Also

Trinity Desktop Environment seems to have started using a wiki. The information that may have been at http://www.TrinityDesktop.org/installation.php#redhat now seems to be at https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/RedHat_Trinity_Repository_Installation_Instructions The other links seem to work as is. I will make the appropriate change in my copy of

Excellent. Thank you; a most useful option of the MoinMoin wiki. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would like to be given sufficient access to > > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy > the >

Hi, Small correction there. Example 4 of section 2 (how to use XFS with CentOSPlus kernel) says you should use this configuration line in [centosplus] section of yum: includepkgs=kernel* xfs* dmapi* However, the XFS module's package name is kmod-xfs*, so I believe it should actually be: includepkgs=kernel* kmod-xfs* xfs* dmapi* I did this on a system of mine, and in the first case it did

I'm looking for guidance here. Selecting [http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/packages/atomic-release/ atomic-release] returns a 404. In fact, http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/packages/ comes back as 404 also. It seems to an inexperienced me, that https://www.atomicorp.com/downloads.html under the anchor <a title="Atomicorp Free RPMS repository"

Maybe I posted this a little late on Friday for anyone to take an interest in suggesting a properly built search URL for the current forum software, so I did some experiments which led to the suggestion added below the copy of the previous post. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:52 PM, I wrote: > [ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > > Proposal: > The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, > but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent > repositories safely usable and give a thorough explaination of what has happened > in the past without naming names. You are looking for