similar to: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it

I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39 > To: centos-docs at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 > compliancestatement > > Can my

Jason, Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org > >

I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words, where do I discuss this? I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment. -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Karanbir Singh > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07 > > Did you

Where did I go wrong? [root at mail busdev]# stat . File: `.' Size: 4096 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 32768 Directory Device: ah/10d Inode: 147591 Links: 5 Access: (0750/drwxr-x---) Uid: (56755/ busdev) Gid: (56755/ busdev) Access: 2008-01-06 15:49:53.000000000 -0500 Modify: 2008-01-06 15:49:15.000000000 -0500 Change: 2008-01-06 15:59:59.000000000 -0500 [root at

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >

In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --

On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password. Any suggesstion on where to start looking? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443)

Where should we start on preventing this type of problem? [root at server34 mqueue]# find | wc -l 185259 -jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555

An hour of my life disapeared and my beautiful uptime was rebooted and it was fixed by reading http://serverfault.com/questions/98900/is-a-reboot-required-to-refresh-permissio ns-after-adding-a-user-to-a-new-group #/home is mounted from a NFS export [jpyeron at node000 ~]$ cat /tmp/jobs/foo.txt ~jobs/test.txt ~jobs/userstest.txt afasdasd cat: /home/jobs/test.txt: Permission denied Sun May 5

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.

> -----Original Message----- > From: Akemi Yagi > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with > Centos and leap > > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? > Should we be worried?

Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

After reading http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-November/001828.html what would the best approach for downgrading samba-3.0.10-1.4E.12.2 to 2.7 on centos4, then later upgrading back to current? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -

We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed. It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart. It behaves as indicated in http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5084845 using ypbind-1.17.2-13 on Centos 4.5 / Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov

So I was googling around about this over the last week and here is what I found: nis/yp is for some reason bad. Kerbos is holy, but no how-to's that don't involve windows and active directory. What is the recommended sso approach for centos? Where are there examples / docs to follow? Jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -

I am looking to use the update-conflict-detection false; directive in the dhcpd.conf. It is supported in EL6 or and dhcp >=3.1.0a1. Since I am not going to get permission to switch to EL6 or dhcp 3.1 what are my options? Background: I have a DNS/DHCPD system which its conf files are generated automagically. Depending on which network a device is on the ip address will change. It is always

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Murphy > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:58 > > I think the panic is the consequence of drive write failure. > So the actual > problem is before the panic call trace. Most of the time it panics without any warning, but once there was: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Sunday,