similar to: status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation"

2016 Mar 22
2
status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for >> point #3 (Manuals and other documentation) >> As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to >>
2016 Mar 22
0
status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On 22/03/16 10:21, Fran?ois Cami wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: >> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for >>> point #3 (Manuals and other documentation) >>> As we
2016 Mar 22
1
status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > On 22/03/16 10:21, Fran?ois Cami wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant >> <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: >>> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was having a look at that
2016 Mar 22
0
status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > Hi, > > I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for > point #3 (Manuals and other documentation) > As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to > explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS > documentation) , almost all the points coming from uptream documentation
2016 May 12
3
Request to contribute to wiki page (CentOS)
Hi, We have received the subscription notification. Following is the information required to contribute to the wiki page: Username: PacktPublishing Subject: Book feature on the wiki page Location: https://wiki.centos.org/Books Thanks & Regards Sherwin Sherwin Silveira Key Partner Executive -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2014 Sep 10
1
Scheduling migration for wiki.centos.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, As I received positive feedback from testers (thank you all !) on the wikitesting.centos.org moin instance, I think we can say that we'll migrate the real wiki.centos.org very soon ... I'm actually moving some services around (pdns/msync roles) to free a machine that will be able to host the moin/wiki role. Depending on the available
2017 Dec 11
4
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org ? As a reminder, current wiki.centos.org instance is powered by moinmoin (https://moinmo.in/) but quite an old version (moin-1.5.8-3.el6.noarch) Recently I had a quick look at trying to update/upgrade that version to something newer/supported, but it's a nightmare : the data conversion just kill the target server (oom) and no
2015 Feb 10
1
Fwd: CentOS.org redirected links in wiki.c.o/Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/02/15 05:58, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> From: PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb >> 2, 2015 at 11:14 AM Subject: CentOS.org redirected links in >> wiki.c.o/Download To: "CentOS-docs - centos-docs at CentOS.org" >> <centos-docs at centos.org> >> >> >> The
2017 Dec 11
3
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
On 11/12/17 10:22, Thibaut Perrin wrote: > Hello Fabien, > > First, thank you for even trying for what seems to be an impossible task :( > > Quick points :? > - if it was decided not to continue, what would happen to the current > wiki ? Dismantled or would it remain as read-only for documentation > purpose ? > - What about Sphinx
2014 Sep 03
7
Testing Wiki migration - asking for testers
Hi nice people interested in CentOS Docs and wiki ! There were already threads about migrating the wiki to something else (mediawiki, $other), or staying with moinmoin (what we now have in place). This mail isn't about that thread (but feel free to start a new one about that possible migration or not), but about just migrating the current moinmoin instance from the current machine to a new
2017 Dec 12
1
wiki.centos.org .. what's next ?
On 12/12/17 17:25, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org > <mailto:arrfab at centos.org>> wrote: > > it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org > <http://wiki.centos.org> ? > > As a reminder, current wiki.centos.org <http://wiki.centos.org> > instance is
2017 Jul 11
2
Sending git changes on the centos-docs for centos.org website
Hi, Just to let you know that we decided to send all the git notifications to the centos-docs list for the centos.org website. The git repository is hosted on https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=websites/centos.org.git (will be open soon) It's low-traffic, so centos-docs list will not receive a huge amount of notifications, but at least some people on the list will get notification when a git
2023 Jul 11
2
[centos/centos.org] branch main updated (92ccbf4 -> 411cbb1)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a change to branch main in repository centos/centos.org. from 92ccbf4 Update distro-faq.md new 8542f8a Removing hostdime from active sponsors new 411cbb1 Removing estruxture from active sponsors The 2 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be
2016 May 19
3
CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 114, Issue 3
Hi Fabian, Thanks for your reply. Could you please direct me to the person who could give me the rights to add our books? Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks & Regards Sherwin Sherwin Silveira Key Partner Executive ----- Original Message ----- From: centos-docs-request at centos.org To: centos-docs at centos.org Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:30:01 PM Subject:
2007 Jul 04
2
Centos 4.x / RHEL AS 4.x Clustering documentation
Hi, Can someone point me to documents as to how to install Redhat Enterprise AS 4.x Or Centos 4.x similar with a 1 active 3 passive clustering scenario? Thanks, -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780
2018 Apr 11
3
Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7
For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras repository. In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt in. As a result ansible is back in the EPEL7 repository for 2.5.0+ , having been removed for ansible 2.4.2 when it got introduced to the RHEL
2009 Apr 15
1
OT: download wiki theme from wiki.centos.org
Hi all, How can I download wiki theme designed for wiki.centos.org? I have tried with this command, but it doesn't works: svn export https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork/trunk/MoinThemeDesign Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
2018 Feb 22
2
wiki content management via automation
On 21/02/18 22:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > That's a good question, as we'll also have to migration for moinmoin if > we can't find a support path to migrate to supported version anyway. > So first question (already asked on the list) : is there a way to get in > touch with moin people willing to help/assist us ? (as their upgrade > tool wasn't working to test
2018 Jan 18
2
Update the "repository URL" links for centos.org website
I had a bit of trouble git cloning the website since the repository URL portion isn't filled in, see: https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=websites/centos.org.git Only until I went onto https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=websites/bugs.centos.org.git was I able to infer on how to actually git clone it. Could someone possibly update the URL for
2016 Mar 25
5
www.centos.org/forums/
Hi List, Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0. I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the impression that it should not be used anymore. Thanks for any enlightenment. Steve --